| Literature DB >> 35203806 |
Meryem Bakour1, Hassan Laaroussi1, Driss Ousaaid1, Asmae El Ghouizi1, Imane Es-Safi2, Hamza Mechchate2, Badiaa Lyoussi1.
Abstract
Bee bread is a natural product obtained from the fermentation of bee pollen mixed with bee saliva and flower nectar inside the honeycomb cells of a hive. Bee bread is considered a functional product, having several nutritional virtues and various bioactive molecules with curative or preventive effects. This paper aims to review current knowledge regarding the chemical composition and medicinal properties of bee bread, evaluated in vitro and in vivo, and to highlight the benefits of the diet supplementation of bee bread for human health. Bee bread extracts (distilled water, ethanol, methanol, diethyl ether, and ethyl acetate) have been proven to have antioxidant, antifungal, antibacterial, and antitumoral activities, and they can also inhibit α-amylase and angiotensin I-converting enzyme in vitro. More than 300 compounds have been identified in bee bread from different countries around the world, such as free amino acids, sugars, fatty acids, minerals, organic acids, polyphenols, and vitamins. In vivo studies have revealed the efficiency of bee bread in relieving several pathological cases, such as hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress.Entities:
Keywords: bee bread; bioactive molecules; health benefits; natural antibiotics; natural antioxidant
Year: 2022 PMID: 35203806 PMCID: PMC8868279 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11020203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Figure 1The process of forming bee bread in the hive.
The chemical composition of bee bread from different countries in the world.
| Component | Method Used | Country | Botanical Origin | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free amino acids | Tryptophan, Taurine, | LC-MS/MS | Turkey | Five samples | [ |
| Phenylalanine, Valine, Histidine, Methionine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Threonine, Alanine, Arginine, Tyrosine, Glycine, Proline, Hydroxyproline, Serine, Glutamic acid, Aspartic acid, andLysine | Chromatographic separation | Malaysia | Four multifloral samples | [ | |
| Aspartate, Glutamate, Asparagine, Serine, Glutamine, Histidine, Glycine, Threonine, Arginine, Alanine, γ-aminobutyric acid, Tyrosine, Cysteine, Valine, Methionine, Tryptophan, Phenylalanine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, and Proline | UHPLC | England | Fifty-one samples of bee bread ( | [ | |
| Alanine, Aspartic acid, Glutamine, Serine, Leucine, Iso-leucine, Methionine, Threonine, Valine, Tryptophan, Cysteine, Phenylalanine, and Proline. | (GC/MS) | USA | Two samples | [ | |
| Alanine, Arginine, Aspartic acid, Glutamic acid, Glycine, Histidine, Hydroxyproline, Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Proline, Serine, Threonine, Tyrosine, and Valine | Waters AccQ Tag method | Malaysia | Three samples (not determined). | [ | |
| Sugars | Trehalose, Glucose, and Fructose | HPLC-RID | Morocco | One multifloral sample | [ |
| Fructose, Glucose, Melezitose, andRaffinose | HPLC-RID | Romania | One sample (not determined). | [ | |
| Fructose, Glucose, Turanose, and Maltose | HPLC-DAD | Romania and India | Five samples (Brassicaceae, Poaceae, Myrtaceae, Rutaceae, Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Tiliaceae, Fabaceae, Rosaceae, Plantaginaceae, Fabaceae, Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Salicaceae, Rosaceae, and Fagaceae) | [ | |
| Fructose, Glucose, Sucrose, and Maltose | HPLC coupled with an ELSD | Malaysia | Four multifloral samples ( | [ | |
| Microorganisms | RAPD-PCR | Turkey | Four samples (not identified). | [ | |
| NGS-sequencing | Bulgaria | Four samples (not identified). | [ | ||
| PCR-DGGE analysis | Italy | Twelve samples (not identified) | [ | ||
| Organic acids | Oxalic acid | UFLC-PDA | Morocco | One multifloral sample | [ |
| Gluconic acid, Formic acid, Lactic acid, Acetic acid, Succinic acid, Propionic acid, Butyric acid | HPLC-DAD | Romania | One sample (not determined) | [ | |
| Vitamins | Vitamin A, Vitamin E, Thiamine, andRiboflavin | HPLC | Malaysia | One sample (not determined) | [ |
| Vitamin C | Method AOAC 967.21 | Malaysia | Four multifloral samples ( | [ | |
| α-Tocopheroland δ-Tocopherol. | HPLC | Morocco | One multifloral sample | [ | |
| Octanoic, Decanoic, Undecanoic, Dodecanoic, Tridecanoic, Tetradecanoic, Pentadecanoic, Hexadecanoic, Palmitoleic, Heptadecanoic, Stearic, Oleic, Linoleic, α-Linolenic, Arachidic, Gadoleic, Eicosadienoic, Heneicosanoic, Eicosatrienoic, Arachidonic, Eicosatrienoic, Behenic, Eicosapentaenoic, Lignocerin, andNervonicacid. | GC-FID | Morocco | [ | ||
| Fatty acids | Butanoic, Hexanoic, Octanoic, Decanoic, Undecanoic, Dodecanoic, Tridecanoic, Tetradecanoic, Pentadecanoic, Hexadecanoic, Heptadecanoic, Octadecanoic, Icosanoic, Heneicosanoic, Docosanoic, Tricosanoic, Tetracosanoic, (Z)-tetradec-9-enoic, (Z)-pentadec-10-enoic, (9Z)-hexadec-9-enoic, cis-10-heptadecenoic, (E)-octadec-9-enoic, (Z)-octadec-9-enoic, (Z)-icos-11-enoic, (Z)-docos-13-enoic, (Z)-tetracos-15-enoic, octadeca-9,12-dienoic, (9Z,12Z)-octadeca-9,12-dienoic, Octadeca-6,9,12-trienoic, Icosa-11,14-dienoic, (11Z,14Z,17Z)-icosa-11,14,17-trienoic, (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)-icosa-5,8,11,14-tetraenoic, Docosa-13,16-dienoic, (9Z,12Z,15Z)-octadeca-9,12,15-trienoic, (11Z,14Z,17Z)-icosa-11,14,17-trienoic, (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)-icosa-5,8,11,14,17-pentaenoic, and Docosa-4,7,10,13,16,19-hexaenoic | GC-MS | Turkey |
Eight monofloral samples ( | [ |
| Butanoic acid, Hexanoic acid, Octanoic acid, Decanoic acid, Undecanoic acid, Dodecanoic acid, Tridecanoic acid, Tetradecanoic acid, (cis-9) (Z)-tetradec-9-enoic acid, Pentadecanoic acid, (cis-10) (Z)-pentadec-10-enoic, Hexadecanoic acid, (9Z)-hexadec-9-enoic acid, Heptadecanoic acid, cis-10-heptadecenoic, Octadecanoic acid, (E)-octadec-9-enoic, (Z)-octadec-9-enoic, (all-trans-9,12) Octadeca-9,12-dienoic acid, (all-cis-9,12) (9Z,12Z)-octadeca-9,12-dienoic acid, (all-cis-6,9,12) Octadeca-6,9,12-trienoic acid, (all-cis-9,12,15) Octadeca-6,9,15-trienoic acid, Icosanoic acid, (cis-11) (Z)-icos-11-enoic acid, (all-cis-11,14,) Icosa-11,14-dienoic acid, (all-cis-8,11,14) Icosa-8,11,14-trienoic acid, (all-cis-11,14,17) Icosa-11,14,17-trienoic acid, (all-cis-5,8,11,14) Icosa-5,8,11,14-tetraenoic acid, (all-cis-5,8,11,14,17) Icosa-5,8,11,14,17-pentaenoic, Heneicosanoic acid, Docosanoic acid, (cis-13) (Z)-docos-13-enoic, (all-cis-13,16) Docosa-13,16-dienoic, (all-cis-4,7,10,13,16,19) Docosa-4,7,10,13,16,19-hexaenoic, Tricosanoic acid, Tetracosanoic acid, and (cis-15) (Z)-tetracos-15-enoic | GC-MS | Romania | One sample (not determined) | [ | |
| Butyric acid, Caproic acid, Caprylic acid, Capric acid, Undecanoic acid, Lauric acid, Tridecanoic acid, Myristic acid, Pentadecanoic, Palmitic acid, Heptadecanoic acid, Stearic acid, Arachidic acid, Heneicosanoic, Behenic acid, Tricosanoic acid, Lignoceric acid, Myristoleic acid, cis-Pentadecanoic acid, Palmitoleic acid, cis-Heptadecanoic acid, Elaidic acid, Oleic acid, cis-Eicosenoic, Erucic acid, Nervonic acid, Linolelaidic acid, Linoleic acid, g-Linolenic acid, cis-11,14-Eicosadienoic, cis-8,11,14-Eicosatrienoic acid, Arachidonic acid, cis-13,16 Docosadienoic, a-Linolenic acid, cis-11,14,17-Eicosatrienoic acid, cis-5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoic acid, and Docosahexaenoic acid | GC-FID | Turkey | In five monofloral samples, the majority of pollen is | [ | |
| Minerals | Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, Zn, P, Pb, Ni, Se, Mn, Co, Cu, and Cd | ICP-AES | Morocco | One multifloral sample ( | [ |
| Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Zn, P, and Se. | ICP-MS | Malaysia | Four multifloral samples ( | [ | |
| Na, Mg, K, Ca, Mn, Se, Fe, Zn, and Cu. | ICP-MS | Serbia | Twelve bee bread samples (not determined) | [ | |
| Ca, P, K, Mg, Fe, Zn, and Mn | AAS | Malaysia | One sample (not determined) | [ | |
| Polyphenols composition | Kaempferol-3- | HPLC-DAD | Romania and India | Five samples (Brassicaceae, Poaceae, Myrtaceae, Rutaceae, Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Tiliaceae, Fabaceae, Rosaceae, Plantaginaceae, Fabaceae, Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Salicaceae, Rosaceae, and Fagaceae) | [ |
| HPLC | Lithuania | Nine simples (not determined) | [ | ||
| Caffeic acid, p-Coumaric acid, Rosmarinic acid, Myricetin, Luteolin, Quercetin, and Kaempferol | HPLC-DAD | Romania | One sample (not determined) | [ | |
| Naringin, Rutin, and Quercetin. | HPLC | Georgia | Two samples | [ | |
| Kaempferol and Apigenin | GC/MS | Poland | Three samples. | [ | |
| Kaempferol- | LC-DAD–ESI/MSn | Morocco | One multifloral sample ( | [ | |
| Hesperetin, Quercetin- | LC/DAD/ESI-MS | Portugal | Three samples. | [ | |
| 2,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid, 2-Hydroxycinnamic acid, Caffeic acid, Catechin, Epicatechin, Chlorogenic acid, Ethyl gallate, Gallic acid, Isorhamnetin, Kaempferol, Luteolin, Myricetin, Naringin, p-Coumaric acid, Phlorizin, Propyl gallate, Protocatechuic acid, Quercetin, Resveratrol, Rutin, Salicylic acid, Sinapic acid, Syringic acid, Trans ferulic acid | LC-MS/MS | Turkey | Five samples | [ | |
| Myricetin-3- | HPLC-DAD-ESI/MS | Portugal | Six samples (not identified) | [ | |
In vitro studies of bee bread from different countries in the world.
| Country | Functional Effect | The Majority of Pollen Grains Identified in Bee Bread (BB) | Extraction Used | Concentration | Extraction Time | Results Obtained | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | Antioxidant | One sample, not identified | Hexane and 70% ethanol using Soxhlet | Sixty gramsof sample extracted with 300 mL of solvent | 2 h | DPPH value of ethanolic extract (%): 93.60 ± 0.03 | [ |
| Portugal | Antioxidant | Three samples | EtOH/H2O (80:20, | Two grams of sample was extracted with 40 mL of EtOH/H2O (80:20, | Total phenolic content value ranging between 3.2 and 3.8 ± 0.1 mg GAE/g | [ | |
| Ukraine | Antioxidant | Five samples | Methanol/water solution (70%, | A total of 0.1 g of sample in 5 mL of methanol/water solution (70%, | Total phenolic content value ranging between 12.36 and 25.44 mg GAE/g | [ | |
| Lithuania | Antioxidant | Four samples | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not | Total phenolic content value ranging between 306 and 394 mg GAE/100g | [ |
| Colombia | Antioxidant | 15 samples, not identified | Ethanol (96% | One gram of sample extracted with 30 mL of solvent | 24 h | FRAP value ranging between 35.0 and 70.1 μmoltrolox/g | [ |
| Lithuania | Antioxidant | One sample (not identified) | Three types of extraction: | Extract 1: 3 g of BB was extracted by boiling with 10 volumes of distilled water. | Extract 1: 1h | Superoxide anion radical scavenging abilities ranged between 9.92% and 100% | [ |
| Morocco | Antioxidant | One sample (not identified) | Ethanolic extraction (70%) | One gram of BB macerated in 20 mL | 1 week | Polyphenol content was 14.88 ± 0.98 mg GAE/g, flavonoid content was 1.67 ± 0.12 mg QE/g, total antioxidant capacity was 143.78 ± 11.38 mg AAE/g, IC50 of DPPH was 0.05 ± 0.01 mg/mL, IC50 of ABTS was 0.08 ± 0.05 mg/mL, and reducing power was 0.05 ± 0.04 mg/mL | [ |
| Morocco | Antioxidant | One multifloral sample (35% | Hydromethanolic extract | One gram of BB extracted twice with | 60 min | Total antioxidant capacity: 143 ± 22 | [ |
| Ukraine | Antioxidant | Five samples (not determined) | BB was extracted with ethanol | A total of 0.1 g of BB was extracted with 20 mL of ethanol (80%) | 2 h | Total polyphenol content ranged between | [ |
| Lithuania | Antioxidant | Nine samples (not determined) | Extraction of phenolic compounds using distilled water, methanol, and diethyl ether | Fifty grams of BB was extracted with 250 mL of distilled water and 250 mL of methanol; the residue obtained was dissolved in 5 mL of distilled water and extracted with 5 mL of diethyl ether (three times) | Not | DPPH values ranged between 64.2 ± 1.8% and 93.9 ± 0.6% | [ |
| Morocco | Antioxidant | One sample (not identified) | BB was extracted with ethyl acetate | - | Not | Polyphenols: 27.27 ± 0.38 mg EqGA/g | [ |
| Poland | Antioxidant | Three samples (not identified) | Ethanolic | Twenty grams were extracted with 80 g of 95% ( | 12 h | Polyphenolic content: ranged between 33.43 ± 0.7 and 36.52 ± 0.6 mg GAE/g | [ |
| Antitumoral | The cytotoxicity of BB was studied using a glioblastoma cell line (U87MG), the results indicated a time-dependent inhibitory | ||||||
| Turkey | α-amylase inhibition | One sample; predominant pollen was | BB was frozen, powdered, and then extracted with methanol | Two grams was mixed with 10 mL of methanol | 48h | IC50 of α-amylase inhibition was 3.57 ± 0.01, better than acarbose (IC50 = 5.93 ± 0.01) | [ |
| Lithuania | Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition | One sample (not determined) | Preparation of enzymatic hydrolysates from bee bread by digestion with three kinds of enzymes (pepsin, trypsin, and papain) | 10% | Not determined | IC50 of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition of pepsin hydrolysate: 1.48 mg protein/mL | [ |
| Portugal | Antitumor activity | Six samples, not determined | BB was lyophilized and extracted twice with methanol:water (80:20, | One gram of BB in 30 mL of solvent | 1h | Three samples of BB hadcytotoxic activity against MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma), IG50 values were: 186 ± 6 µg/mL; 84 ± 3 µg/mL; and 164 ± 4 µg/mL. | [ |
| Turkey | Antioxidant | One sample; predominant pollen was | BB was frozen, powdered, and then extracted with methanol | Two grams was mixed with 10 mL of methanol | 48 h under stirring | Total phenolics:6.93 ± 0.09 mg GAE/g; | [ |
| Malaysia | Antioxidant | Three samples, not identified | Distilled water or ethanol 70% | Fifty grams of bee bread extracted with 10 volumes of distilled water or 70% of ethanol | 72 h | DPPH value of aqueous extract ranging between 2.86% and 8.95% | [ |
Antimicrobial and antiviral activities of bee bread.
| Effect | Country | Type of the Study | Bacteria/Fungi/Virus Strains | Extract Used | Key Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibacterial | Morocco | In vitro | Gram-positive bacteria: | Hydromethanolic | Gram-positive bacteria: | [ |
| Antifungal | MIC values ranged between 0.35 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL, and MFC values | |||||
| Antibacterial | Morocco | In vitro | Gram-positive bacteria: | DMSO (10%) | Gram-positive bacteria: | [ |
| Antibacterial | Lithuania | In vitro | Gram-positive bacteria: | One gram of bee products was dissolved in 20 mL of aqueous ethanol (500 mL/L) for 6 h | The inhibition diameters ranged between | [ |
| Greek | In vitro | Gram-positive bacteria: | Different amounts of bee bread were extracted with 10 mL of water at room temperature for 24 | Gram-positive bacteria: | [ | |
| Poland | In vitro | Gram-positive bacteria: | BB extracted in 70% ethanol at | Gram-positive bacteria: | [ | |
| Antibacterial | Ukraine | In vitro | Gram-negative bacteria: | BB was extracted with ethanol; | Gram-positive bacteria: | [ |
| Antiviral | Greece | Cell culture method | Enterovirus D68 | BB was dissolved in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle cell culture medium for one hour at room temperature | IC50 ranged between 0.048 and 5.45 mg/mL | [ |
| Antibacterial | Malaysia | In vitro | Gram-positive bacteria: | Twenty grams of BB were extracted twice with 80 g of 95% ( | Gram-positive bacteria: | [ |
| Antibacterial | Malaysia | In vitro | Gram-negative bacteria: | Fifty grams of BB were extracted with 500 mL of 70% ethanol and with water and hot water for 72 h at room temperature | [ | |
| Antibacterial | Egypt | In vitro | Gram-positive bacteria: | One hundred grams of BB were soaked in 200 mL of ethanol 80% for 24 h and then homogenized for | Gram-positive bacteria: | [ |
| Antifungal | Unicellular fungi | The inhibition diameter for | ||||
| Antibacterial | Ukraine | In vitro | Gram-positive bacteria: | BB was extracted by maceration using 50% ethanol | Gram-positive bacteria: | [ |
| Antifungal | Candia species: |
Figure 2The possible antibacterial mechanisms of action of the bioactive molecules found in bee bread.
Pharmacological properties of bee bread in vivo.
| Country | Functional | Protocol Used | Palynological Analysis of Bee Bread (BB) | The Majority of Compounds Identified | Extraction Used | Concentration/ | Administration Routes | Model Used | Results Obtained | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morocco | Hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic, and hepatoprotective effects | Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats | Isorhamnetin- | Ethyl acetate extract | 100 mg/kg | Oral | Wistar rats | ↓ Blood glucose levels | [ | |
| Morocco | Protective effects against anemia, inflammation, and hepato-renal toxicity | Toxicity of | One sample | Polyphenol content: 14.88 ± 0.98 mg GAE/g Flavonoid content: | Maceration for one week in 70% ethanol under agitation | 500 and 750 mg/kg | Oral | Male Wistar rats | ↑ Hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cells, MCH, MCV, and MCHC | [ |
| Morocco | Protective effects against the toxicity induced by titanium dioxide in biochemical parameters of the brain, liver, and kidney tissues | Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induced toxicity in rats | Isorhamnetin- | Ethanolic extract | 100 mg/kg | Oral | Wistar rats | ↓ AST, ↓ ALT, ↓ LDH | [ | |
| Slovakia | Alleviates lipid abnormalities and impaired bone morphology in obese Zucker diabetic rats | Obese Zucker diabetic rats | Monofloral | Vitamin A, vitamin E | Mixed with distilled water | 500 and 700 mg/kg | Oral | Zucker diabetic | ↓ Blood glucose level | [ |
| Malaysia | Protective effect against testicular oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and lactate transport in the testes of obese rats | High-fat diet | One sample (not determined) | Riboflavin, thiamine, vitamin A, vitamin E, Fe, Cu, Zn, apigenin, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, isorhamnetin, andkaempferol | Blended and used as a fine powder | 0.5 g/kg/day) once daily for 12 weeks. | Oral | Male Sprague–Dawley rats | ↓ Final body weight and weight gain | [ |
| Turkey | The effects of bee bread on leptin and ghrelin expression in obese rats | Female rats became obese with a high-fat diet | One sample | Protein: | Distilled water | Concentration1: | Oral | Sprague–Dawley adult female rats | ↓ Ghrelin immunoreactivity in obese rats that received BB (100 mg/kg/day and 200 mg/kg/day). ↑ Leptin immunoreactivity in obese rats that received BB (100mg/kg/day and 200 mg/kg/day). ↓ Apoptotic cell numbers in hypothalamus tissue | [ |
| Slovakia | The effects of dietary bee bread powder on the chemical composition of quail meat. | Dietary supplementation of bee bread powder in quails | One sample | (not determined) | Bee bread powder | 2 g or 4 g or 6 g per 1 kg of feed mixture | Oral | Japanese quails | The effect of BB supplementation on the chemical composition of breast muscle in quails: | [ |
| China | Regulation of lipid metabolism | SPF rats | Not mentioned | - | 80, 400, and 800 mg/kg during 20 days | Oral | Rats | ↓ Fatty acid Synthase | [ | |
| Malaysia | Bee bread attenuates high-fat diet (HFD) induced renal pathology in obese rats via | High-fat diet | One sample | Protein: 3.37 ± 0.30% | Distilled water | 0.5g/kg | Oral | Male Sprague–Dawley rats | ↓ % change in body weight, BMI index in rats that received HFD treated or protected with BB. ↓ Kidney weight in rats that received HFD treated or protected with BB. ↑ SOD, GPx, GST, TAA in rats that received HFD treated or protected with BB | [ |
| Malaysia | Bee bread ameliorates the impaired vasorelaxation response to ACh by improving the | High-fat diet | One sample | Potassium (7323.04 mg/kg), magnesium (1530.87 mg/kg), calcium | Distilled water | 0.5 g/kg | Oral | Male Sprague–Dawley rats | BB improves the lipid profile, aortic inflammatory markers, and impaired vasorelaxation activity. | [ |
| Slovakia | Reduced femoral bone structure and improved glucose and lipid metabolism in Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats | Obese Zucker diabetic rats | Not mentioned | - | The sample was crushed and mixed with distilled water | 500 mg/kg | Oral | Diabetic fatty rats | ↓ Fasting blood glucose level | [ |
↑: Increase; ↓ Decrease.