| Literature DB >> 28666426 |
Lucy Dorey1, Ludovic Pelligand2, Peter Lees2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacterial pneumonia in pigs occurs widely and requires antimicrobial therapy. It is commonly caused by the pathogens Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida. Marbofloxacin is an antimicrobial drug of the fluoroquinolone class, licensed for use against these organisms in the pig. In recent years there have been major developments in dosage schedule design, based on integration and modelling of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data, with the objective of optimising efficacy and minimising the emergence of resistance. From in vitro time-kill curves in pig serum, PK/PD breakpoint Area under the curve (AUC) 24h /minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined and used in conjunction with published PK, serum protein binding data and MIC distributions to predict dosages based on Monte Carlo simulation (MCS).Entities:
Keywords: A. Pleuropneumoniae; Marbofloxacin; Monte Carlo simulation; P. Multocida; Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic; Pig; Time-kill curves
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28666426 PMCID: PMC5493866 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1128-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Formula for calculation of the daily antimicrobial drug dose based on PK and PD variables
Fig. 2The sigmoidal Emax equation used to model time-kill data by non-linear regression [27]
Fig. 3Marbofloxacin MIC distributions of P. multocida (n = 230) and A. pleuropneumoniae (n = 219) indicating frequency of MICs. MIC data were generated using CLSI guidelines by de Jong et al. [29]). All isolates were from European countries
Fig. 4Formulae for calculation of the loading dose for 48 h duration of action, where eq. a can be expressed as eq. b and simplified as eq. c. K10 = elimination rate constant; τ = dosing interval in h; Cl48 = body clearance over 48 h; KPD breakpoint = AUC divided by 24; MICDistribution = MICs determined from epidemiological surveys; F = bioavailability (from 0 to 1); fu = fraction of drug not bound to protein binding
Fig. 5Example plots of AUC24h/MIC (h) versus change in bacterial count (log10 CFU/mL) for P. multocida in (a) broth and (b) serum. The points represent observed values and the curves are lines of best fit
P. multocida PK/PD modelling of in vitro marbofloxacin time-kill curves (mean, standard deviation, n = 6)
| Parameter (units) | Broth | Serum | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD (CV%) | Mean | SD (CV%) | |
| Log E0 (CFU/mL) | 2.66 | 0.26 | 2.70 | 0.32 |
| Log Emax (CFU/mL) | −7.28 | 0.37 | −5.65 | 1.43 |
| Log Emax - Log E0 (CFU/mL) | −9.95 | 0.11 | −8.35 | 1.11 |
| Gamma | 3.26 | 1.48 | 1.95 | 0.23 |
| AUC24h/MIC for bacteriostatic action (h) | 26.5 | 4.65 (17.5) | 20.9 | 2.31(11.1) |
| AUC24h/MIC50(h) | 38.0 | 8.05 (21.2) | 30.5 | 5.39 (17.7) |
| AUC24h/MIC for bactericidal action (h) | 41.8 | 7.79 (18.7) | 45.2 | 5.58 (12.3) |
| AUC24h/MIC for 4 log10 reduction (h) | 48.9 | 10.8 (22.0) | 71.7 | 34.0 (47.4) |
E0 = difference in number of organisms (CFU/mL) in control sample in absence of drug between time 0 and 24 h; Emax = difference in number of organisms (CFU/mL) in presence of marbofloxacin between time 0 and 24 h; AUC24/MIC50 = concentration producing reduction in count to 50% of the Emax; Gamma = slope of the curve; detection limit = 33 CFU/mL
A. pleuropneumoniae PK/PD modelling of in vitro marbofloxacin time-kill curves (mean, standard deviation, n = 6)
| Parameter (units) | Broth | Serum | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD (CV%) | Mean | SD (CV%) | |
| Log E0 (CFU/mL) | 2.65 | 0.42 | 1.79 | 0.64 |
| Log Emax (CFU/mL) | −5.57 | 0.80 | −6.71 | 0.65 |
| Log Emax - Log E0 (CFU/mL) | −8.23 | 0.38 | −8.50 | 0.01 |
| Gamma | 3.18 | 1.20 | 4.07 | 0.77 |
| AUC24h/MIC for bacteriostatic action (h) | 24.8 | 1.79 (7.2) | 32.4 | 5.30 (16.4) |
| AUC24h/MIC50(h) | 31.8 | 4.09 (12.9) | 45.6 | 9.45 (20.7) |
| AUC24h/MIC for bactericidal action (h) | 42.0 | 4.34 (10.3) | 48.7 | 6.58 (13.5) |
| AUC24h/MIC for 4 log10 reduction (h) | 54.0 | 7.04 (13.0) | 55.5 | 6.43 (11.6) |
E0 = difference in number of organisms (CFU/mL) in control sample in absence of drug between time 0 and 24 h; Emax = difference in number of organisms (CFU/mL) in presence of marbofloxacin between time 0 and 24 h; AUC24/MIC50 = concentration producing reduction in count to 50% of the Emax; Gamma = slope of the curve; detection limit = 33 CFU/mL
Predicted once daily doses calculated by deterministic approach
| Level of kill | Predicted daily doses (mg/kg) | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Bacteriostatic | 0.19 | 0.15 |
| Bactericidal | 0.41 | 0.26 |
| 4log10 count reduction | 0.65 | 0.32 |
Predicted once daily doses of marbofloxacin at steady state in pigs of three ages (weeks): 27 (A), 16 (B) and 12 (C)a
| Predicted daily doses | Target Attainment Rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 50% | 90% | ||
| A. | |||
|
| Bacteriostatic | 0.08 | 0.19 |
| Bactericidal | 0.18 | 0.43 | |
| Virtual eradication | 0.28 | 0.67 | |
|
| Bacteriostatic | 0.07 | 0.17 |
| Bactericidal | 0.12 | 0.29 | |
| 4log10 reduction | 0.15 | 0.36 | |
| B. | |||
|
| Bacteriostatic | 0.09 | 0.21 |
| Bactericidal | 0.20 | 0.45 | |
| Virtual eradication | 0.32 | 0.72 | |
|
| Bacteriostatic | 0.08 | 0.17 |
| Bactericidal | 0.13 | 0.30 | |
| 4log10 reduction | 0.17 | 0.37 | |
| C. | |||
|
| Bacteriostatic | 0.13 | 0.28 |
| Bactericidal | 0.28 | 0.59 | |
| Virtual eradication | 0.45 | 0.94 | |
|
| Bacteriostatic | 0.10 | 0.22 |
| Bactericidal | 0.18 | 0.39 | |
| 4log10 reduction | 0.22 | 0.48 | |
aMonte Carlo simulation to achieve 50 and 90% target attainment rates at steady state for three levels of bacterial kill
Predicted doses of marbofloxacin for three durations of activity (24, 48 and 72 h)a
| Target Attainment Rate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Dose duration | Level of bacterial kill | 50% | 90% | 50% | 90% |
| 0-24 h | Bacteriostatic | 0.12 | 0.29 | 0.03 | 0.07 |
| Bactericidal | 0.27 | 0.64 | 0.05 | 0.12 | |
| 4 log10 reduction | 0.43 | 1.01 | 0.06 | 0.14 | |
| 0-48 h | Bacteriostatic | 0.19 | 0.44 | 0.16 | 0.39 |
| Bactericidal | 0.40 | 0.95 | 0.28 | 0.66 | |
| 4 log10 reduction | 0.64 | 1.51 | 0.34 | 0.82 | |
| 0-72 h | Bacteriostatic | 0.26 | 0.60 | 0.22 | 0.53 |
| Bactericidal | 0.56 | 1.31 | 0.38 | 0.92 | |
| 4 log10 reduction | 0.88 | 2.08 | 0.47 | 1.14 | |
aMonte Carlo Simulation to achieve 50 and 90% target attainment rates for two levels of bacterial kill and three action durations