| Literature DB >> 35158950 |
Maximilian Knoll1,2,3,4, Maria Waltenberger1,2,3,4, Jennifer Furkel1,2,3,4, Ute Wirkner1,2,3,4, Aoife Ward Gahlawat1,2,3,4, Ivana Dokic1,2,3,4, Christian Schwager1,2,3,4, Sebastian Adeberg1,3,4,5, Stefan Rieken1,3,4,5, Tobias Kessler6, Felix Sahm7, Laila König1,3,4,5, Christel Herold-Mende4,8, Stephanie E Combs9, Jürgen Debus1,3,4,5, Amir Abdollahi1,2,3,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the value of whole blood transcriptome data from liquid biopsy (lbx) in recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) patients for longitudinal molecular monitoring of tumor evolution under carbon ion irradiation (CIR).Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; carbon ion irradiation; liquid biopsy; recurrent high-grade glioma; whole blood transcriptome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35158950 PMCID: PMC8833402 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Overview of the study cohort. (A) Patient cohort and available data. (B) Distribution of main patient and molecular tumor characteristics (WHO grade initial: histopathologic grade at initial diagnosis). (C) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients (time from reRT time point to death/last follow up) for initial WHO tumor grade (left) and tumor grade at reRT time point (radiographic grade). Likelihood ratio test p-values, Cox-PH models.
Patient characteristics. % at reRT time point, ! at initial diagnosis time point.
| Feature | N (%)/Time [Month] | |
|---|---|---|
| All | 14 (100) | |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 9 (64) | |
| Female | 5 (36) | |
| Age [yr] % | ||
| <40 | 2 (14) | |
| 40–49 | 6 (43) | |
| ≥50 | 6 (43) | |
| Grade ! | ||
| II | 5 (36) | |
| III | 2 (14) | |
| IV | 7 (50) | |
| Grade % | ||
| III | 5 (36) | |
| IV | 9 (64) | |
| Grade ! -> % | ||
| II -> III | 3 (21) | |
| II -> IV | 2 (14) | |
| Time to reRT | ||
| II | 5 (36)/80.9 | |
| III | 2 (14)/86.8 | |
| IV | 7 (50)/11.4 | |
| C12 irradiation | ||
| Total dose [GyRBE]/#fx | 30/10 | 5 (36) |
| 33/11 | 6 (43) | |
| 36/12 | 3 (21) | |
| Single dose [GyRBE] | 3 | 14 (100) |
Figure 2Patient characteristics reflected in whole blood transcriptome data. (A) t-SNE representation of gene expression data, multiple longitudinal samples per patients are assigned the same color. Triangles and dots are used solely for better discernibility. (B) Selection of least variant (median absolute deviation, mad) and highly expressed (median) genes per patient, left: representative distributions (mad, median) and genes for patient 1 (median: >97.5% quantile, mad: <2.5% quantile), right: numbers of selected genes for each patient. (C) Clustered correlation matrix of all genes identified in (B). (D) Distribution of mad values of all genes. (E) Genes associated with sex, (F) genes associated with age ((E,F) only 10% most variant genes as shown in (D) were evaluated, linear mixed model analysis, FDR < 0.05).
Figure 3Tumor characteristics in whole blood transcriptome data. (A,F) t-SNE representation of whole blood transcriptome data (left) and AIC values for logistic regression models to separate grade IV vs. non-IV samples per time point ((A–E) initial WHO grade, (F–I) WHO grade at reRT time point). Star: drop in AIC for initial grades at later time points. (B,G) Differential CIBERSORT derived cell fractions (linear mixed model Wald type p-value, all cell fractions with p < 0.05). (C,H) Genes associated with tumor grade (10% most variant genes [mad], FDR < 0.05). (D,I) Genes associated with HNRPH1 (C) and BBS2, CDK2AP1, NQO2 (H) expression (Bonferroni adjusted p-value < 0.05, linear models). (I) shows a Venn diagram of commonly regulated genes from (H) (left) and CD74 expression (right). (E) Hierarchical cluster analysis of multiple hypoxia scores and association with initial grade (right, linear mixed model). (B,C,G–I) Dots in boxplot subfigures represent outliers (see methods).
Figure 4CIR induced transcriptome alterations, (A) gives an overview of outlined analyses. (B) Differential genes in pre- vs. post-CIR, ~factor(timepoint), linear mixed model, most variant 10% genes (mad). (C) Models tested with more liberal cutoffs (FDR < 0.2, all genes). Hierarchical cluster analysis (D) of all genes identified in (C) on age, sex and initial WHO grade adjusted expression data, (E) genes grouped by expression dynamics (see text, (D,E) z-transformed adjusted data). (F) Pairwise differences between pre and nth post-CIR time point, non-parametric model analysis (nparLD, FDR < 0.05). (G) Venn diagram and table of genes (H) from (F) with FDR < 0.05. (I) Commonly identified genes with FDR < 0.2 between all pairwise comparisons (see F), and genes associated with SBF2 expression ((J), Bonferroni adjusted p-value < 0.05) (no associated genes were detected for LOC644251).
Figure 5Carbon irradiation dose dependent associations in whole blood transcriptome. (A) Protein interaction networks of genes with significant interaction between pre-CIR and nth post-CIR time point (rankFD, FDR < 0.05). (B) Venn diagram of identified genes. (C) Gene expression of identified network proteins. (D) Schematics of tests for least variant pre-CIR genes (left) with dose dependent interaction (right). Arrows indicate degree of variability. (E) Interaction effects for genes with low variation pre-CIR (pairwise TOST between dose levels) and linear mixed model analyses in post-CIR samples. Candidates with lowest p-values are shown in (F).
Figure 6Assessment of longitudinal changes (dynamic profiles) in whole blood transcriptomes. (A) Schema of performed calculations. (B) Hierarchical cluster analysis of the correlation matrix C. (C) CRISPLD2 expression in main clusters shown in C. (D) Multivariate survival analysis (parametric survival regression, Weibull distribution) with tumor grade at reRT time point. (E) AIC of multivariate survival models (analogously to E) with initial tumor grade instead of reRT grade, null model: without CRISPLD2, full model: with CRISPLD2. (F) REACTOME pathway analysis of genes associated with CRISPLD2 expression (Bonferroni adjusted p-value < 0.05, n = 834 genes).