Literature DB >> 29433917

Independent validation of a new reirradiation risk score (RRRS) for glioma patients predicting post-recurrence survival: A multicenter DKTK/ROG analysis.

Maximilian Niyazi1, Sebastian Adeberg2, David Kaul3, Anne-Laure Boulesteix4, Nina Bougatf2, Daniel F Fleischmann5, Arne Grün3, Anna Krämer6, Claus Rödel6, Franziska Eckert6, Frank Paulsen7, Kerstin A Kessel8, Stephanie E Combs8, Oliver Oehlke9, Anca-Ligia Grosu9, Annekatrin Seidlitz10, Annika Lattermann10, Mechthild Krause11, Michael Baumann10, Maja Guberina12, Martin Stuschke12, Volker Budach3, Claus Belka5, Jürgen Debus13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Reirradiation (reRT) is a valid option with considerable efficacy in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma, but it is still not known which patients might be optimal candidates for a second course of irradiation. This study validated a newly developed prognostic score independently in an external patient cohort.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The reRT risk score (RRRS) is based on a linear combination of initial histology, clinical performance status, and age derived from a multivariable model of 353 patients. This score can predict post-recurrence survival (PRS) after reRT. The validation dataset consisted of 212 patients.
RESULTS: The RRRS differentiates three prognostic groups. Discrimination and calibration were maintained in the validation group. Median PRS times in the development cohort for the good/intermediate/poor risk categories were 14.2, 9.1, and 5.3 months, respectively. The respective groups within the validation cohort displayed median PRS times of 13.8, 8.8, and 3.8 months, respectively. Uno's C for development data was 0.64 (CI: 0.60-0.69) and for validation data 0.63 (CI: 0.58-0.68).
CONCLUSIONS: The RRRS has been successfully validated in an independent patient cohort. This linear combination of three easily determined clinicopathological factors allows for a reliable classification of patients and may be used as stratification factor for future trials.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glioblastoma; High-grade glioma; RRRS; Reirradiation; Score

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29433917     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  13 in total

Review 1.  A Second Course of Radiotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: Clinical Data on Re-irradiation, Prognostic Factors, and Usefulness of Digital Biomarkers.

Authors:  Christoph Straube; Kerstin A Kessel; Claus Zimmer; Friederike Schmidt-Graf; Jürgen Schlegel; Jens Gempt; Bernhard Meyer; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-07-19

2.  Reirradiation of High-Grade Gliomas: A Retrospective Analysis of 198 Patients Based on the Charité Data Set.

Authors:  David Kaul; Vera Pudlitz; Dirk Böhmer; Peter Wust; Volker Budach; Arne Grün
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-18

3.  High-dose salvage re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive adult diffuse glioma: healing or hurting?

Authors:  T Gupta; M Maitre; P Maitre; J S Goda; R Krishnatry; A Chatterjee; A Moiyadi; P Shetty; S Epari; A Sahay; V Patil; R Jalali
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Contribution of PET imaging to radiotherapy planning and monitoring in glioma patients - a report of the PET/RANO group.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Maximilian Niyazi; Anca L Grosu; Martin Kocher; Karl-Josef Langen; Ian Law; Giuseppe Minniti; Michelle M Kim; Christina Tsien; Frederic Dhermain; Riccardo Soffietti; Minesh P Mehta; Michael Weller; Jörg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  FET-PET radiomics in recurrent glioblastoma: prognostic value for outcome after re-irradiation?

Authors:  Montserrat Carles; Ilinca Popp; Michael Maximilian Starke; Michael Mix; Horst Urbach; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; Franziska Eckert; Maximilian Niyazi; Dimos Baltas; Anca L Grosu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 6.  Current status and recent advances in reirradiation of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Giuseppe Minniti; Maximilian Niyazi; Filippo Alongi; Piera Navarria; Claus Belka
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  First statement on preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic in large German Speaking University-based radiation oncology departments.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs; Claus Belka; Maximilian Niyazi; Stefanie Corradini; Steffi Pigorsch; Jan Wilkens; Anca L Grosu; Matthias Guckenberger; Ute Ganswindt; Denise Bernhardt
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  A balanced score to predict survival of elderly patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Christoph Straube; Kerstin A Kessel; Stefanie Antoni; Jens Gempt; Bernhard Meyer; Juergen Schlegel; Friederike Schmidt-Graf; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Victor Lewitzki; Rainer J Klement; Rebekka Kosmala; Dominik Lisowski; Michael Flentje; Bülent Polat
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Accelerated hyper-versus normofractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Rainer J Klement; Ilinca Popp; David Kaul; Felix Ehret; Anca L Grosu; Bülent Polat; Reinhart A Sweeney; Victor Lewitzki
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.