Literature DB >> 28281610

The standard of newly qualified dental graduates - foundation trainer perceptions.

C J Oxley1, R Dennick2, P Batchelor3.   

Abstract

Background There have been anecdotal concerns that the skill mix of recently qualified graduates is very different to those qualifying several years ago, in particular that the clinical skills on qualification are less. If true, such changes may have ramifications for providers of undergraduate training, postgraduate training, particularly at foundation training level, and ultimately the public.Aim The aim of this study was to assess changes in perceived standards of newly qualified graduates as reported by foundation trainers.Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-completed internet-based survey tool sent to all foundation trainers (FTs) in England, Northern Ireland and Wales.Results A total of 312 responses were obtained covering all postgraduate deaneries. There was mixed opinion regarding standards of new graduates, with 51% reporting that the overall standard of those entering foundation training was 'unsatisfactory'. Standards in key clinical areas were considered unsatisfactory by large proportions of respondents. Eighty-five percent considered standards to be unsatisfactory in 'crown and bridge', 75% in 'extraction of teeth', 74% in endodontics, 67% in removable prosthodontics, and 62% in treatment planning. Experienced trainers identified a decline in standards in particular clinical areas.Conclusions A large proportion of foundation trainers consider the current standard of new graduates to be unsatisfactory for entering foundation training. There are a number of key clinical areas of concern and a perception of declining standards.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28281610     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  17 in total

1.  Dental education: Potentially damaging disconnect.

Authors:  L Cabot; M Woolford; A Banerjee; M Cobourne; A Hasan; H Lewis-Greene; M Packer; S Sood; J Turner; E Whaites
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Dental education: Reflective practitioners.

Authors:  G Kane
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Negative tone.

Authors:  D R Radford; P H Hellyer
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Educational aspects of oral cancer.

Authors:  P M Farthing; P M Speight
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Tier 2 NHS services in primary dental care - where are the risks?

Authors:  L D'Cruz
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Clinical skills of a new foundation dentist: the expectations of dental foundation education supervisors.

Authors:  A S M Gilmour; R J Jones; J G Cowpe; A D Bullock
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Clinical skills of a new foundation dentist: the experience of dental foundation educational supervisors.

Authors:  R J Jones; J G Cowpe; A D Bullock; A S M Gilmour
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Prepared for practice and equipped for employment: what do dental foundation trainers think of their trainees?

Authors:  S Hanks; C Coelho; R Coster
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Dental education: Difficulties in comparing standards.

Authors:  N A Araujo; S P Behrens
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  Dental education: All of the picture.

Authors:  J J Sellers
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.