| Literature DB >> 35081972 |
Scott B Laffoon1,2,3, James D Doecke4, Anne M Roberts5,6, Jennifer A Vance7, Benjamin D Reeves2, Kelly K Pertile1, Rebecca L Rumble1, Chris J Fowler1, Brett Trounson1, David Ames1, Ralph Martins3,8,9, Ashley I Bush1,3, Colin L Masters1,3, Paul A Grieco2, Edward A Dratz2, Blaine R Roberts10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Australian Imaging and Biomarker Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging is designed to aid the discovery of biomarkers. The current study aimed to discover differentially expressed plasma proteins that could yield a blood-based screening tool for Alzheimer's disease.Entities:
Keywords: 2D-PAGE; APOE; Alzheimer’s disease; Biomarkers; Blood; Plasma; Proteomics; Zdye
Year: 2022 PMID: 35081972 PMCID: PMC8790928 DOI: 10.1186/s12953-021-00185-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proteome Sci ISSN: 1477-5956 Impact factor: 2.480
Demographic data for each group of pooled plasma (n = 12 individuals per pool, three groups per condition). The p-value was calculated with a two-tailed Student’s t-test between All AD and All controls only
| Parameter | Female AD | Male AD | Female Controls | Male Controls | All AD | All Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years | 82.2 (1.2) | 77.0 (1.8) | 69.1 (1.5) | 70.5 (4.7) | 79.6 (3.1) | 69.8 (3.2) | 0.0001 |
| % | 37.5 (4.2) | 43.1 (16.8) | 19.4 (2.4) | 6.9 (6.4) | 40.3 (11.4) | 13.2 (8.1) | 0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/mg2)a | 25.2 (1.2) | 24.6 (1.7) | 27.2 (1.7) | 25.9 (0.3) | 24.9 (1.4) | 26.5 (1.3) | 0.06 |
| n | 36 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 72 | 72 |
aBMI values from 54/72 AD subjects, 60/72 control subjects. Samples are from the baseline timepoint of the ABIL study
Demographic data for plasma samples used for targeted mass spectrometry biomarker validation
| Controls | Alzheimer Disease | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years | 72.9 (6) | 76.9 (7.4) | 0.003* |
| 13 | 37 | 0.01# | |
| 20.5 | 6.8 | 0.06# | |
| % Female | 50 | 50 | |
| Amyloid PET SUVR | 1.17 (0.05) | 2.35 (0.49)a | 2e-10 |
| n | 44 | 44 |
*p-value calculated using non-paired Student’s t-test
#p-value for APOE allele frequency calculated using N-1 χ2
aPET scans are only available for 22 of the 44 cases
Fig. 1Study design and experimental workflow. (1) Shows how the control and Alzheimer’s disease plasma was pooled into sex specific and disease specific groups. Each pooled group was generated from 12 individuals. (2) The pooled plasma was then depleted of the 14 most abundant proteins using the multiple affinity removal system (MARS14, Agilent Tech.). The low abundance proteins were further fractionated using reverse phase chromatography (3) to generate 6 fractions (4) for 2D differential gel electrophoresis of proteins labeled with Zdyes™ (4)
Fig. 2Representative 2D gel images of proteins from the six-reverse phase HPLC fractions (F1-F6). The proteins were labeled with Zdyes™ but are displayed here on grey scale as it provides a better display allowing the lower abundant proteins to be visible. The arrows indicate the protein spots with abundance changes in AD pools compared to HC, as discussed in the Results and Discussion sections and illustrated in Figs. 3 and 5
Fig. 3False-color image overlays of two-color multiplex gels from reverse phase fraction 2 prior to spot-matching alignment. Three subunit chains of Hpt are outlined in ovals in the upper right image. The AD pools are represented by green in the upper three images and the controls were labeled red. In the lower images the labeling was reversed to control for potential bias induced by the dyes (AD labeled Green and controls labeled Red). Yellow spots represent approximately equal contribution of intensity from AD and control proteins
Fig. 5Intact and cleaved VDBP with sex specific changes shown in tables on the right. A Intact (top spot train) and cleaved VDBP (spots A, B, C). This spot train corresponds to n in Fig. 2 fraction 3. The intact VDBP spots were saturated in fluorescence signal intensity and masked from the Progenesis analysis. B Cleaved VDBP (A - M). This cluster of cleavages corresponds to o in Fig. 2 fraction 3. C Cleaved VDBP (A - E). This cluster of cleavages corresponds to x in Fig. 2 fraction 3. Significant changes (p < 0.05) are shown in bold
Differentially expressed proteins discovered with 2D gel proteomics with a p-value < 0.05
| Protein name | Accession # | RP | MW | Whole cohort | Male cohort | Female cohort | MS method | Mascot | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fraction ID | (kDa) | AD fold change | AD fold change | AD fold change | Score/ #peptides | |||||||
| Zinc α 2-glycoprotein (ZAG) | P25311 | 1a | 40 | 1.9 up | < 0.05 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 2 | NS | Most basic glycoform |
| Zinc α 2-glycoprotein (ZAG) | P25311 | 1b | 40 | 1.5 up | < 0.05 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 2 | 111/4 | Most basic glycoform |
| Zinc α 2-glycoprotein (ZAG) | P25311 | 1c | 40 | 1.3 up | 0.06 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 2 | 88/6 | NS but trending |
| Histidine-rich glycoprotein (HRG) | P04196 | 1d | ~ 35 | 1.7 up | < 0.02 | NS | NS | 2.9 up | < 0.002 | 2 | 161/4 | Putative cleavage product |
| Unidentified Series | n/a | 1e | ~ 40 | 1.5 down | < 0.05 | NS | NS | NS | NS | – | n/a | Low abundant species |
| Haptoglobin (Hpt) heavy chain | P00738 | 2a | 40 | 2.0 up | < 0.01 | NS | NS | 2.2 up | < 0.02 | 2 | 238/13 | Summation of variants |
| Haptoglobin (Hpt) mid chain | P00738 | 2b | 16 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | 2 | a | NS changing subunit of Hpt |
| Haptoglobin (Hpt) light chain | P00738 | 2c | 9 | 2.4 up | < 0.02 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 2 | a | Summation of variants |
| Vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) | P02774 | 3b | ~ 50 | NS | NS | See Fig. | Cleavage products | |||||
| Vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) | P02774 | 3c | ~ 40 | NS | NS | See Fig. | Multiple cleavage products | |||||
| Vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) | P02774 | 3d | ~ 10 | NS | NS | See Fig. | Multiple cleavage products | |||||
| Inter α trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4 (ITIH4) | Q14624 | 3e | ~ 12 | 1.3 up | < 0.05 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 3 | 428/5 | C-term clevage product |
| Complement factor 1(CFI) | P05156 | 3f | ~ 53 | NS | NS | 2.5 up | < 0.01 | 2.6 down | < 0.02 | 2 | 64/2 | Putative cleavage product |
| Complement factor 1(CFI) | P05156 | 3 g | ~ 53 | NS | NS | 2.0 up | < 0.001 | 2.4 down | < 0.03 | 2 | 78/2 | Putative cleavage product |
| Complement factor 1(CFI) | P05156 | 3 h | ~ 53 | NS | NS | 3.6 up | 0.056 | 3.1 down | < 0.03 | 2 | 127/4 | Putative cleavage product |
| Complement factor 1(CFI) | P05156 | 3i | ~ 53 | NS | NS | 4.0 up | < 0.1 | 3.1 down | 0.058 | 2 | 69/1 | NS but trending |
| Inter α trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4 (ITIH4) | Q14624 | 4a | ~ 40 | 1.3 up | < 0.05 | 1.5 up | < 0.02 | NS | NS | 3 | 890/14 | N-term cleavage product |
| C-reactive binding protein (CRP) | P02741 | 4b | 25 | 3.2 up | 0.19 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 1 | 96/2 | NS change |
| C-reactive binding protein (CRP) | P02741 | 4c | 25 | 2.9 up | 0.09 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 1 | NS | NS change |
| C-reactive binding protein (CRP) | P02741 | 4d | 25 | 2.4 up | 0.18 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 1 | NS | NS change |
| C-reactive binding protein (CRP) | P02741 | 4e | 25 | 2.2 up | 0.06 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 1 | NS | NS but trending |
| α 1-antitrypsin (α1AT) | P01009 | 5a | ~ 47 | 3.3 | < 0.02 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 2 | 86/3 | |
| Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) | P02649 | 5b | 34 | 1.5 up | < 0.02 | NS | NS | NS | NS | 2 | 149/7 | Epsilon 4 proxy |
aBased on continuity of spot train in gel
NS Not submitted
Fig. 4A Regression analysis of the basic fraction 5 ApoE variant (ε4 proxy) with the fractional APOE ε4 gene dosage of the 12 pools: R2 = 0.83, p < 0.0001. Pool symbols are male healthy controls -╳, female healthy controls -▵, male AD -□, female AD -◇. B Regression analysis of total cohort, non-binding α1-antitrypsin (α1AT) variant vs. apoE ε4 proxy: R2 = 0.82, p < 0.0001; Pools are n = 12. Group symbols are: AD - ⊕, HC - +. C Fraction 5 multiplex gels that have not been aligned for spot-matching. Arrows indicate the correlated changes between the ε4 proxy spot (lower end) and the AD significant α1AT variant (upper end). The AD pools are represented by red in the upper three images and by green in the lower images, reflecting the dye reversal, used between these gels. Yellow represents approximately equal contribution of intensity from AD and control proteins. D. Detail from a pair of multiplexed gel images representative of low ApoE ε4 containing pools (panel i) and high ApoE ε4 containing pools (panel ii). The level of α1ACT isoforms correlated with the 34 kDa ApoE ε4 proxy spot that is shown in lower right-hand corners of the panel i and ii images. Regression analysis Pearson correlations: a- p = 0.012, R2 = 0.45; b- p = 0.002, R2 = 0.61; c- p = 0.003, R2 = 0.56; d- p = 0.002, R2 = 0.61; e- p = 0.007, R2 = 0.51; f- p = 0.003, R2 = 0.58. None of the α1ACT spots significantly discriminated the AD group from the HC group. The α1AT spot that significantly discriminated AD from HC pools (3.3 fold, p < 0.02,) is shown in panel ii
Fig. 6Measurement of plasma biomarkers in control (n = 44, black diamonds) and Alzheimer’s disease (n = 44, grey circles) plasma. Biomarker candidates discovered using 2D gels were targeted and measured using LC-MS/MS and heavy labeled ([13C6,15N2 -lysine] or [13C6,15N4-arginine) peptides as internal standards. P-values were calculated using a one-way ANOVA and Sidak correction for multiple comparisons [53]
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of proteins measured by targeted LC-MS assay showing ability to distinguish controls (n = 44) from Alzheimer’s case (n = 44)
| Protein ID | AUC | Sensitivity % | Specificity % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complement C3 | 0.65 | 70 | 59 | 0.014 |
| Beta-2-Microglobulin | 0.64 | 42 | 80 | 0.022 |
| Peroxiredoxin-2 | 0.60 | 44 | 72 | 0.098 |