Suzanne E Schindler1, James G Bollinger1, Vitaliy Ovod1, Kwasi G Mawuenyega1, Yan Li1, Brian A Gordon1, David M Holtzman1, John C Morris1, Tammie L S Benzinger1, Chengjie Xiong1, Anne M Fagan1, Randall J Bateman2. 1. From the Department of Neurology (S.E.S., J.G.B., V.O., K.G.M., D.M.H., J.C.M., T.L.S.B., C.X., A.M.F., R.J.B.), Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (S.E.S., B.A.G., D.M.H., J.C.M., T.L.S.B., C.X., A.M.F., R.J.B.), Division of Biostatistics (Y.L., C.X.), Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (B.A.G., T.L.S.B.), and Hope Center for Neurological Disorders (D.M.H., A.M.F., R.J.B.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 2. From the Department of Neurology (S.E.S., J.G.B., V.O., K.G.M., D.M.H., J.C.M., T.L.S.B., C.X., A.M.F., R.J.B.), Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (S.E.S., B.A.G., D.M.H., J.C.M., T.L.S.B., C.X., A.M.F., R.J.B.), Division of Biostatistics (Y.L., C.X.), Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (B.A.G., T.L.S.B.), and Hope Center for Neurological Disorders (D.M.H., A.M.F., R.J.B.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. batemanr@wustl.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether plasma β-amyloid (Aβ)42/Aβ40, as measured by a high-precision assay, accurately diagnosed brain amyloidosis using amyloid PET or CSF p-tau181/Aβ42 as reference standards. METHODS: Using an immunoprecipitation and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay, we measured Aβ42/Aβ40 in plasma and CSF samples from 158 mostly cognitively normal individuals that were collected within 18 months of an amyloid PET scan. RESULTS: Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 had a high correspondence with amyloid PET status (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [AUC] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.93) and CSF p-tau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92). The combination of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, age, and APOE ε4 status had a very high correspondence with amyloid PET (AUC 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.97). Individuals with a negative amyloid PET scan at baseline and a positive plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 (<0.1218) had a 15-fold greater risk of conversion to amyloid PET-positive compared to individuals with a negative plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, especially when combined with age and APOE ε4 status, accurately diagnoses brain amyloidosis and can be used to screen cognitively normal individuals for brain amyloidosis. Individuals with a negative amyloid PET scan and positive plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 are at increased risk for converting to amyloid PET-positive. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 could be used in prevention trials to screen for individuals likely to be amyloid PET-positive and at risk for Alzheimer disease dementia. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 levels accurately determine amyloid PET status in cognitively normal research participants.
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether plasma β-amyloid (Aβ)42/Aβ40, as measured by a high-precision assay, accurately diagnosed brain amyloidosis using amyloid PET or CSF p-tau181/Aβ42 as reference standards. METHODS: Using an immunoprecipitation and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay, we measured Aβ42/Aβ40 in plasma and CSF samples from 158 mostly cognitively normal individuals that were collected within 18 months of an amyloid PET scan. RESULTS: Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 had a high correspondence with amyloid PET status (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [AUC] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.93) and CSF p-tau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92). The combination of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, age, and APOE ε4 status had a very high correspondence with amyloid PET (AUC 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.97). Individuals with a negative amyloid PET scan at baseline and a positive plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 (<0.1218) had a 15-fold greater risk of conversion to amyloid PET-positive compared to individuals with a negative plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, especially when combined with age and APOE ε4 status, accurately diagnoses brain amyloidosis and can be used to screen cognitively normal individuals for brain amyloidosis. Individuals with a negative amyloid PET scan and positive plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 are at increased risk for converting to amyloid PET-positive. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 could be used in prevention trials to screen for individuals likely to be amyloid PET-positive and at risk for Alzheimer disease dementia. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 levels accurately determine amyloid PET status in cognitively normal research participants.
Authors: William E Klunk; Robert A Koeppe; Julie C Price; Tammie L Benzinger; Michael D Devous; William J Jagust; Keith A Johnson; Chester A Mathis; Davneet Minhas; Michael J Pontecorvo; Christopher C Rowe; Daniel M Skovronsky; Mark A Mintun Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Yi Su; Tyler M Blazey; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle; Daniel S Marcus; Beau M Ances; Randall J Bateman; Nigel J Cairns; Patricia Aldea; Lisa Cash; Jon J Christensen; Karl Friedrichsen; Russ C Hornbeck; Angela M Farrar; Christopher J Owen; Richard Mayeux; Adam M Brickman; William Klunk; Julie C Price; Paul M Thompson; Bernadino Ghetti; Andrew J Saykin; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson; Peter R Schofield; Virginia Buckles; John C Morris; Tammie L S Benzinger Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Bob Olsson; Ronald Lautner; Ulf Andreasson; Annika Öhrfelt; Erik Portelius; Maria Bjerke; Mikko Hölttä; Christoffer Rosén; Caroline Olsson; Gabrielle Strobel; Elizabeth Wu; Kelly Dakin; Max Petzold; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Dorene M Rentz; Keith A Johnson; Jason Karlawish; Michael Donohue; David P Salmon; Paul Aisen Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Oskar Hansson; John Seibyl; Erik Stomrud; Henrik Zetterberg; John Q Trojanowski; Tobias Bittner; Valeria Lifke; Veronika Corradini; Udo Eichenlaub; Richard Batrla; Katharina Buck; Katharina Zink; Christina Rabe; Kaj Blennow; Leslie M Shaw Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Sebastian Palmqvist; Pontus Tideman; Nicholas Cullen; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Jeffery L Dage; Erik Stomrud; Shorena Janelidze; Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Oskar Hansson Journal: Nat Med Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Michael S Rafii; Beau M Ances; Nicole Schupf; Sharon J Krinsky-McHale; Mark Mapstone; Wayne Silverman; Ira Lott; William Klunk; Elizabeth Head; Brad Christian; Florence Lai; H Diana Rosas; Shahid Zaman; Melissa E Petersen; Andre Strydom; Juan Fortea; Benjamin Handen; Sid O'Bryant Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2020-10-27
Authors: Thomas K Karikari; Andréa L Benedet; Nicholas J Ashton; Juan Lantero Rodriguez; Anniina Snellman; Marc Suárez-Calvet; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Firoza Lussier; Hlin Kvartsberg; Alexis Moscoso Rial; Tharick A Pascoal; Ulf Andreasson; Michael Schöll; Michael W Weiner; Pedro Rosa-Neto; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 15.992