| Literature DB >> 35079621 |
Mohammad Moradi1,2, Reza Golmohammadi3, Ali Najafi1, Mehrdad Moosazadeh Moghaddam4, Mahdi Fasihi-Ramandi1, Reza Mirnejad1.
Abstract
In the last century, the emergence of in silico tools has improved the quality of healthcare studies by providing high quality predictions. In the case of COVID-19, these tools have been advantageous for bioinformatics analysis of SARS-CoV-2 structures, studying potential drugs and introducing drug targets, investigating the efficacy of potential natural product components at suppressing COVID-19 infection, designing peptide-mimetic and optimizing their structure to provide a better clinical outcome, and repurposing of the previously known therapeutics. These methods have also helped medical biotechnologists to design various vaccines; such as multi-epitope vaccines using reverse vaccinology and immunoinformatics methods, among which some of them have showed promising results through in vitro, in vivo and clinical trial studies. Moreover, emergence of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms have helped to classify the previously known data and use them to provide precise predictions and make plan for future of the pandemic condition. At this contemporary review, by collecting related information from the collected literature on valuable data sources; such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, we tried to provide a brief outlook regarding the importance of in silico tools in managing different aspects of COVID-19 pandemic infection and how these methods have been helpful to biomedical researchers.Entities:
Keywords: Drug design; Immunoinformatics; In silico; Machine learning; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine design; Virtual screening
Year: 2022 PMID: 35079621 PMCID: PMC8776350 DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2022.100862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Inform Med Unlocked ISSN: 2352-9148
Fig. 1The critical role of in silico assays in universal battle against COVID-19 and some of their application in medicine and biology.
Examples of in silico structural predictions and phylogenetic studies regarding COVID-19.
| Author and Reference | Aim of study | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Tabibzadeh et al. [ | Study and tracking SARS-CoV-2 in Iranian COVID-19 sufferers by molecular and phylogenetic methods | Isolates showed to be closely related with Chinese and reference sequences. No considerable differences were detected between Iranian isolates and those of other countries. |
| Zhang et al. [ | Reanalysis of protein structure and sequence of COVID-19 genome | Suggesting that snakes are the intermediate hosts of SARS-CoV-2 and spike protein insertions share a high similarity with HIV-1 |
| Zhang et al. [ | Genomic characterization and phylogenetic evolution of SARS-CoV-2 | SARS-CoV-2 is closely related (88% identity) to bat-SARS-like coronavirus |
| Sacco et al. [ | Developing dual inhibitors against Mpro and cathepsin L | The structure of Mpro with calpain inhibitor II proved that S1 pocket could accommodate a hydrophobic methionine side chain |
| Sakkiah et al. [ | Using homology modeling to construct a trimeric form of the spike protein complexed with h.ACE2 | Interactions between ACE2 and the tertiary structure of the full-length S protein trimer are different from those of ACE2-truncated monomer of RBD |
Examples of in silico virtual drugs screening against COVID-19.
| Author and Reference | Molecular target | Potential drugs |
|---|---|---|
| Chen et al. [ | C-like protease (3CL pro) | Yelpatasvir, and ledipasvir |
| Rahman et al. [ | Main protease (Mpro) | Simeprevir, Ergotamine, Bromocriptine and Tadalafil, |
| Hosseini et al. [ | Mpro, PLpro, and RdRp | Antiemetics rolapitant and ondansetron, labetalol and levomefolic acid, leucal and antifungal natamycin |
| Senathilake et al. [ | Spike Glycoprotein | Dgitoxin, zorubicin and aclarubicin, rolitetracycline, cefoperazone and E−155 |
| Alibakhshi et al. [ | Envelope (E) and Membrane (M) Proteins | Conivaptan, Ecamsule, Conivaptan, etc. |
Examples of studies that used in silico approaches against COVID-19.
| Author and Reference | Source of compound | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Nouadi et al. [ | Moroccan Plants | Taxol, Rutin, Genkwanine, and Luteolin-glucoside showed to a high affinity with ACE2 and 3CLpro |
| Nikunj et al. [ | Red Algae | n-Decanoic acid and 9-dodecenoic acid, methyl ester,(E) showed 81.90% and 81.81% affinity on RBD, respectively |
| Joseph et al. [ | Green tea and Spirulina extracts | Blocking the cell entry of SARS-CoV-2 |
| Marwal et al. [ | Piperine (Black Pepper), Eugenol (Clove), Alliin (Garlic), Gingerol (Ginger) and Curcumin (Turmeric | All compounds showed good docking scores with their respective receptor, ranging from −8.195 to −5.263 via DockThor |
| Beirami et al. [ | 6570 molecules from different herbal plants | Sodwanone B, Cyclomulberrin, and a glycosylated derivative of kaempferol were chosen for future studies based on their docking score |
Some in silico studies for developing peptide-based therapeutics against SARS-CoV2.
| Authors and Reference | Name of peptide | Viral target | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ling et al. [ | HR1-P and HR2-P | Spike | Binding energy of HR2-based antiviral peptide to HR1 was−43.0 kcal/mol, stronger than the natural fusion compound |
| Baig et al. [ | Two novel 23aa and 18aa peptides | Spike | 18aa peptide showed a stable and effective blocking of SARS-CoV-2 cell entry |
| Barh et al. [ | cnCoVP-3, cnCoVP-4, | Spike | Optimal blockade of the Spike RBD and hACE2 interaction which potentially leads to preventing the cell entry |
| and cnCoVP-7 chimeric peptides | |||
| Balmeh et al. [ | glycocin F from Lactococcus lactis and lactococcine G from Lactobacillus plantarum | Spike, RdRp, 3CL, and N protein | Efficient structural suppression of the viral structures by peptides derived from probiotic bacteria |
| Mohammadi et al. [ | Pacific oyster Antiviral Polypeptides | Main Protease | HIV–1PIP-1 (Leu-Leu-Glu-Tyr-Ser-Leu) polypeptide could be a potential inhibitory compound for Mpro |
Fig. 2Schematic workflow of in silico designing a multi-epitope vaccine. A. Collecting the required information regarding the potential vaccine target structures B. Predicting the potential T-cell and B-cell and IFN-γ epitopes in the structure of the molecular target, such as spike protein C. Joining the selected epitopes, and peptide adjuvants by using suitable linkers D. structure prediction and analyzing the modeled multi-epitope peptide E. Molecular docking with potential immune receptors, such as TLRs F. Molecular dynamics simulation to investigate the stability of the complex G.In silico simulation of immune response toward the designed multi-epitope construct.
In silico studies of vaccine design against COVID-19.
| Authors and Reference | Viral antigens | Results of study |
|---|---|---|
| Enayatkhani et al. [ | Nucleocapsid, ORF3a, and Membrane protein | Designed chimeric protein showed to elicit humoral and cell-mediated immune responses |
| Dong et al. [ | ORF7a protein, ORF8 protein, nsp9, nsp6, nsp3, endoRNAse, ORF3a protein, membrane glycoprotein, and nucleocapsid phosphoprotein | |
| Rahman et al. [ | S, M, and E proteins | Vaccine candidate showed a significant potential |
| Arshad Dar et al. [ | Spike | Proposed multiepitope vaccine could provide protective immunity against COVID-19 |
| Kumar et al. [ | Spike | Eliciting a strong immune response for vaccine |
Some of the highlighted studies that used ML.
| Authors and year | Aim of study | The algorithms used | The outcome of study |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ong et al. [ | COVID-19 Vaccine Design | Five supervised classification algorithms, including logistic regression, SVM, k-nearest neighbor, RF, and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) | The designed construct showed to trigger immune response, and the Sp/Nsp cocktail vaccine could stimulate effective complementary immune responses |
| Magar et al. [ | Discovering Potential neutralizing antibodies | XGBoost, Random Forest, Multilayer perceptron, SVM, and Logistic Regression | Screening of thousands antibody sequences and finding nine stable ones that potentially inhibit SARS-CoV-2 |
| Khalifa et al. [ | Classification of potential coronavirus treatments on a single human cell | SVM, decision trees, ensemble and DCNN (Deep convolutional neural networks) | DCNN provided 98.05% testing accuracy, and was more effective than classical ML methods |
| Wu et al. [ | Rapid and accurate identification of COVID-19 infection based on clinical available blood test results | RF | Developing a tool for preliminary assessment of suspected patients and help them to get timely treatment and quarantine suggestion |
| Mohapatra et al. [ | Predicting the efficacy of commercially available drugs against COVID-19 | Naive Bayes | Amprenavir (DrugBank ID–DB00701) could probably be an effective drug for COVID-19 |