| Literature DB >> 33619344 |
Isabelle Q Phan1,2, Sandhya Subramanian1,2, David Kim1,3,4,5, Michael Murphy3,4, Deleah Pettie3,4, Lauren Carter3,4, Ivan Anishchenko1,3,4, Lynn K Barrett1,6, Justin Craig1,6, Logan Tillery1,6, Roger Shek1,6, Whitney E Harrington2,7, David M Koelle6,8,9,10,11, Anna Wald12,8,9,13, David Veesler3, Neil King3,4, Jim Boonyaratanakornkit12,8, Nina Isoherranen14, Alexander L Greninger9, Keith R Jerome9, Helen Chu6, Bart Staker1,2, Lance Stewart1,3,4, Peter J Myler1,2,15, Wesley C Van Voorhis16,17,18,19.
Abstract
Rapid generation of diagnostics is paramount to understand epidemiology and to control the spread of emerging infectious diseases such as COVID-19. Computational methods to predict serodiagnostic epitopes that are specific for the pathogen could help accelerate the development of new diagnostics. A systematic survey of 27 SARS-CoV-2 proteins was conducted to assess whether existing B-cell epitope prediction methods, combined with comprehensive mining of sequence databases and structural data, could predict whether a particular protein would be suitable for serodiagnosis. Nine of the predictions were validated with recombinant SARS-CoV-2 proteins in the ELISA format using plasma and sera from patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, and a further 11 predictions were compared to the recent literature. Results appeared to be in agreement with 12 of the predictions, in disagreement with 3, while a further 5 were deemed inconclusive. We showed that two of our top five candidates, the N-terminal fragment of the nucleoprotein and the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein, have the highest sensitivity and specificity and signal-to-noise ratio for detecting COVID-19 sera/plasma by ELISA. Mixing the two antigens together for coating ELISA plates led to a sensitivity of 94% (N = 80 samples from persons with RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection), and a specificity of 97.2% (N = 106 control samples).Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33619344 PMCID: PMC7900118 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83730-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379