Literature DB >> 33643464

3D Microwell Platforms for Control of Single Cell 3D Geometry and Intracellular Organization.

Robin E Wilson1, Aleksandra K Denisin2, Alexander R Dunn3,4, Beth L Pruitt5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cell structure and migration is impacted by the mechanical properties and geometry of the cell adhesive environment. Most studies to date investigating the effects of 3D environments on cells have not controlled geometry at the single-cell level, making it difficult to understand the influence of 3D environmental cues on single cells. Here, we developed microwell platforms to investigate the effects of 2D vs. 3D geometries on single-cell F-actin and nuclear organization.
METHODS: We used microfabrication techniques to fabricate three polyacrylamide platforms: 3D microwells with a 3D adhesive environment (3D/3D), 3D microwells with 2D adhesive areas at the bottom only (3D/2D), and flat 2D gels with 2D patterned adhesive areas (2D/2D). We measured geometric swelling and Young's modulus of the platforms. We then cultured C2C12 myoblasts on each platform and evaluated the effects of the engineered microenvironments on F-actin structure and nuclear shape.
RESULTS: We tuned the mechanical characteristics of the microfabricated platforms by manipulating the gel formulation. Crosslinker ratio strongly influenced geometric swelling whereas total polymer content primarily affected Young's modulus. When comparing cells in these platforms, we found significant effects on F-actin and nuclear structures. Our analysis showed that a 3D/3D environment was necessary to increase actin and nuclear height. A 3D/2D environment was sufficient to increase actin alignment and nuclear aspect ratio compared to a 2D/2D environment.
CONCLUSIONS: Using our novel polyacrylamide platforms, we were able to decouple the effects of 3D confinement and adhesive environment, finding that both influenced actin and nuclear structure. © Biomedical Engineering Society 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell biomechanics; Intracellular structure; Mechanobiology; Microwell; Polyacrylamide

Year:  2020        PMID: 33643464      PMCID: PMC7878614          DOI: 10.1007/s12195-020-00646-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng        ISSN: 1865-5025            Impact factor:   2.321


  55 in total

Review 1.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion.

Authors:  Rong Peng; Xiang Yao; Jiandong Ding
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Cell adhesion receptors in mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Martin A Schwartz; Douglas W DeSimone
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 8.382

4.  A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape.

Authors:  Shyam B Khatau; Christopher M Hale; P J Stewart-Hutchinson; Meet S Patel; Colin L Stewart; Peter C Searson; Didier Hodzic; Denis Wirtz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sarcomere alignment is regulated by myocyte shape.

Authors:  Mark-Anthony Bray; Sean P Sheehy; Kevin Kit Parker
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2008-08

6.  Contractile Work Contributes to Maturation of Energy Metabolism in hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Bärbel M Ulmer; Andrea Stoehr; Mirja L Schulze; Sajni Patel; Marjan Gucek; Ingra Mannhardt; Sandra Funcke; Elizabeth Murphy; Thomas Eschenhagen; Arne Hansen
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 7.765

Review 7.  Cellular Mechanotransduction: From Tension to Function.

Authors:  Fabiana Martino; Ana R Perestrelo; Vladimír Vinarský; Stefania Pagliari; Giancarlo Forte
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Cancer Cells Invade Confined Microchannels via a Self-Directed Mesenchymal-to-Amoeboid Transition.

Authors:  Andrew W Holle; Neethu Govindan Kutty Devi; Kim Clar; Anthony Fan; Taher Saif; Ralf Kemkemer; Joachim P Spatz
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  Cellular Volume and Matrix Stiffness Direct Stem Cell Behavior in a 3D Microniche.

Authors:  Min Bao; Jing Xie; Nando Katoele; Xinyu Hu; Baoxiu Wang; Aigars Piruska; Wilhelm T S Huck
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 9.229

10.  Perinuclear Arp2/3-driven actin polymerization enables nuclear deformation to facilitate cell migration through complex environments.

Authors:  Hawa-Racine Thiam; Pablo Vargas; Nicolas Carpi; Carolina Lage Crespo; Matthew Raab; Emmanuel Terriac; Megan C King; Jordan Jacobelli; Arthur S Alberts; Theresia Stradal; Ana-Maria Lennon-Dumenil; Matthieu Piel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Fabrication approaches for high-throughput and biomimetic disease modeling.

Authors:  Mackenzie L Grubb; Steven R Caliari
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 10.633

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.