| Literature DB >> 35057523 |
Hammad Ullah1, Eduardo Sommella2, Cristina Santarcangelo1, Danilo D'Avino1, Antonietta Rossi1, Marco Dacrema1, Alessandro Di Minno1,3, Giacomo Di Matteo4, Luisa Mannina4, Pietro Campiglia2,5, Paolo Magni6,7, Maria Daglia1,8.
Abstract
High consumption of fruit and vegetables has an inverse association with cardiometabolic risk factors. This study aimed to chemically characterize the hydroethanolic extract of P. domestica subsp. syriaca fruit pulp and evaluate its inhibitory activity against metabolic enzymes and production of proinflammatory mediators. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry(UHPLC-HRMS) analysis showed the presence of hydroxycinnamic acids, flavanols, and glycoside flavonols, while nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR) analysis showed, among saccharides, an abundant presence of glucose. P. domestica fruit extract inhibited α-amylase, α-glucosidase, pancreatic lipase, and HMG CoA reductase enzyme activities, with IC50 values of 7.01 mg/mL, 6.4 mg/mL, 6.0 mg/mL, and 2.5 mg/mL, respectively. P. domestica fruit extract inhibited lipopolysaccharide-induced production of nitrite, interleukin-1 β and PGE2 in activated J774 macrophages. The findings of the present study indicate that P. domestica fruit extracts positively modulate in vitro a series of molecular mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of cardiometabolic diseases. Further research is necessary to better characterize these properties and their potential application for human health.Entities:
Keywords: HMG-CoA reductase inhibition; Prunus domestica L.; anti-inflammatory activity; chemical characterization; digestive enzyme inhibition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35057523 PMCID: PMC8778072 DOI: 10.3390/nu14020340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Plum varieties, collected from a local cultivator in the Campania Region (Italy). P. domestica L. subsp. domestica (Common plum) and P. domestica L. subsp. syriaca (Mirabelle plum).
Fruit samples and yield of extracts.
| Prunus Variety | Common Name | Skin Color | Fruit Part Extracted | Ethanol | Dry Extract (g/g) 1 | Extraction Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Common plum | Purple | Skin | 99 | 0.42 | 42.0 | |
| 70 | 0.39 | 39.0 | ||||
| 50 | 0.38 | 38.0 | ||||
| Pulp | 99 | 0.60 | 59.5 | |||
| 70 | 0.63 | 63.0 | ||||
| 50 | 0.67 | 67.0 | ||||
| Mirabelle plum | Yellow | Skin | 99 | 0.37 | 37.0 | |
| 70 | 0.41 | 41.0 | ||||
| 50 | 0.43 | 43.0 | ||||
| Pulp | 99 | 0.45 | 45.0 | |||
| 70 | 0.46 | 46.0 | ||||
| 50 | 0.49 | 49.0 |
1 The weight of dry extract obtained in grams per gram of sample used for extraction.
Total phenolic content and Trolox equivalent concentration of the extracts obtained from the two varieties of P. domestica.
| Prunus Variety | Fruit Part Extracted (Ethanol %) | TPC | Trolox Equivalent Concentration (µM/g on Dry Weight Basis) |
|---|---|---|---|
| skin (99%) | 9.1 ± 1.0 | 1282.4 ± 84.1 a | |
| skin (70%) | 12.8 ± 0.9 a | 1826.2 ± 216.4 | |
| skin (50%) | 11.0 ± 0.6 b | 1944.1 ± 138.1 b | |
| pulp (99%) | 7.2 ± 1.0 | 630.5 ± 44.1 a | |
| pulp (70%) | 11.3 ± 0.2 a | 1611.9 ± 289.5 | |
| pulp (50%) | 9.7 ± 0.2 b | 1290.7 ± 155.5 b | |
| skin (99%) | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 708.0 ± 25.1 | |
| skin (70%) | 11.2 ± 1.4 | 1597.4 ± 88.2 c | |
| skin (50%) | 7.9 ± 0.8 c | 1602.1 ± 368.1 | |
| pulp (99%) | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 578.5 ± 53.5 | |
| pulp (70%) | 10.0 ± 0.9 | 727.7 ± 43.9 c | |
| pulp (50%) | 12.9 ± 1.7 c | 1119.4 ± 93.1 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). The assigned values of different letters in a column show significant difference among the mean values (p < 0.05); TPC, Total phenolic content.
Identified compounds in P. domestica subsp. syriaca fruit pulp extract according to the retention time (RT), compound, m/z and MS/MS, molecular formula, and mass accuracy, reported as part per million (ppm) error.
| Peak | rt | Compound | [M-H]- | MS/MS | Molecular Formula | Error (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.60 | Citric acid | 191.0227 | 111.0103; 173.0103 | C6H8O7 | 1.57 |
| 2 | 3.12 | Chlorogenic acid | 353.0874 | 173.0489; 191.0576 | C16H18O9 | −1.13 |
| 3 | 4.68 | Coumaroylquinic acid Isomer | 337.0945 | 163.0417; 119.0558 | C16H18O8 | 4.75 |
| 4 | 5.45 | Catechin | 289.0729 | 245.0816 | C15H14O6 | 3.81 |
| 5 | 6.08 | (+) Epicatechin dimer B type | 577.1328 | 407.0787; 289.0728 | C30H26O12 | −4.16 |
| 6 | 6.50 | Feruloylquinic acid | 367.1053 | 193.0531; 134.0390 | C17H20O9 | 4.90 |
| 7 | 6.70 | Coumaroylquinic acid isomer | 337.0928 | 163.0447; 191.0594 | C16H18O8 | 1.19 |
| 8 | 7.20 | Coumaroylquinic acid isomer | 337.0952 | 173.0458; 163.0418 | C16H18O8 | 2.30 |
| 9 | 8.12 | (+) Epicatechin | 289.0735 | 245.0816 | C15H14O6 | 5.88 |
| 10 | 8.48 | (+) Epicatechin trimer B type | 865.1979 | 407.0790; 287.0569; 577.1344 | C45H38O18 | 3.40 |
| 11 | 8.86 | (+) Epicatechin dimer B type isomer | 577.1344 | 407.0790; 289.0732 | C30H26O12 | −1.39 |
| 12 | 9.70 | Quinic acid derivative | 393.1777 | 149.0465; 191.0561 | C17H30O10 | 2.80 |
| 13 | 10.50 | Feruloyl-coumaroylquinic acid derivative | 559.1665 | 337.0947; 193.0514 | C24H32O15 | −0.54 |
| 14 | 11.29 | Feruloyl-coumaroylquinic acid derivative | 559.1670 | 337.0949; 193.0510 | C24H32O15 | −0.50 |
| 15 | 12.19 | Feruloyl-coumaroylquinic acid derivative | 559.1677 | 337.0946; 193.0514 | C24H32O15 | 1.61 |
| 16 | 12.32 | (+) Epicatechin dimer B type isomer | 577.1358 | 407.0831; 289.0742 | C30H26O12 | 1.04 |
| 17 | 12.74 | (+) Epicatechin B type trimer isomer | 865.2015 | 407.0778; 287.0569; 577.1344; 543.0905 | C45H38O18 | 3.47 |
| 18 | 13.20 | Quercetin-rutinoside | 609.1477 | 301.0351; 271.0254; 255.0320 | C27H30O16 | 3.47 |
| 19 | 13.48 | (+) Epicatechin A type trimer | 863.1823 | 575.1180; 423.0711; 285.0393 | C45H36O18 | −0.20 |
| 20 | 14.04 | (+) Epicatechin A type trimer isomer | 863.1828 | 575.1180; 423.0711; 285.0393 | C45H36O18 | −0.12 |
| 21 | 14.82 | (+) Epicatechin A type dimer | 575.1197 | 423.0746; 285.0395 | C30H24O12 | 1.22 |
| 22 | 15.75 | Quercetin-rhamnoside | 447.0924 | 301.0371; 255. | C21H20O11 | −0.9 |
| 23 | 16.52 | (+) Epicatechin A type dimer isomer | 575.1187 | 423.0716; 285.0398 | C30H24O12 | −1.39 |
Figure 2RP-UHPLC chromatograms of P. domestica subsp. syriaca fruit pulp extract with UV detection registered at λ 280 nm and 330 nm (A), and chromatogram expansion with corresponding peak HRMS assignment (B).
Retention time (min) and peak area, expressed as percentage of total area of the identified compounds in P. domestica subsp. syriaca fruit pulp extract.
| Peak | Compound | Retention Time | Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citric acid | 0.6 | 7.92 |
| 2 | Chlorogenic acid | 3.12 | 15.43 |
| 3 | Coumaroylquinic acid Isomer | 4.68 | 0.74 |
| 4 | Catechin | 5.45 | 8.61 |
| 5 | (+) Epicatechin dimer B type | 6.08 | 5.74 |
| 6 | Feruloylquinic acid | 6.5 | 0.21 |
| 7 | Coumaroylquinic acid isomer | 6.7 | 0.39 |
| 8 | Coumaroylquinic acid isomer | 7.2 | 2.42 |
| 9 | (+) Epicatechin | 8.12 | 4.54 |
| 10 | (+) Epicatechin trimer B type | 8.48 | 0.24 |
| 11 | (+) Epicatechin dimer B type isomer | 8.86 | 5.47 |
| 12 | Quinic acid derivative | 9.7 | 1.98 |
| 13 | Feruloyl-coumaroylquinic acid derivative | 10.5 | 3.01 |
| 14 | Feruloyl-coumaroylquinic acid derivative | 11.29 | 19.55 |
| 15 | Feruloyl-coumaroylquinic acid derivative | 12.19 | 1.49 |
| 16 | Feruloyl-coumaroylquinic acid derivative | 12.32 | 1.47 |
| 17 | (+) Epicatechin dimer B type isomer | 12.74 | 6.27 |
| 18 | (+) Epicatechin B type trimer isomer | 13.2 | 0.79 |
| 19 | Quercetin-rutinoside | 13.48 | 3.20 |
| 20 | (+) Epicatechin A type trimer | 14.04 | 4.05 |
| 21 | (+) Epicatechin A type trimer isomer | 14.82 | 1.81 |
| 22 | (+) Epicatechin A type dimer | 15.75 | 0.16 |
| 23 | Quercetin-rhamnoside | 16.52 | 4.50 |
Compounds identified in the 1H NMR spectrum of P. domestica subsp. syriaca fruit pulp extract dissolved in phosphate buffer/D2O and the corresponding chemical shift signals (ppm) used in the integration process. The compound amounts in μg/mg of dry weight are also reported.
| Compound | Chemical Shift (ppm) of Selected Resonances Used for Quantification | μg/mg Dry Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Quinic acid | 1.88 (CH2-1) | 7.50 |
| Citric acid | 2.54 (α,γ-CH) | 0.84 |
| Malic acid | 4.30 (α-CH) | 38.49 |
| Xylose | 5.20 (CH-1) | 0.56 |
| Glucose | 5.25 (CH-1) | 106.59 |
| Sucrose | 5.42 (CH-1) | 31.59 |
Figure 31H NMR spectrum of P. domestica subsp. syriaca fruit pulp extract. Quantified selected NMR signals are reported in expanded regions. (A) CH2-1 protons of quinic acid (1.88 ppm), (B) α,γ-CH protons of citric acid (2.54 ppm), (C) α-CH proton of malic acid (4.30 ppm), (D) CH-1 proton of in α-xylose (5.20 ppm), (E) CH-1 proton of α-glucose (5.25 ppm), (F) CH-1 proton of sucrose (5.42 ppm).
Figure 4Enzyme inhibition activities and calculated IC50 values of P. domestica subsp. syriaca fruit pulp extract. α-amylases inhibition (A), α-glucosidase inhibition (B), HMG CoA reductase inhibition (C), Pancreatic lipase inhibition (D). Data expressed as mean ± SD. The IC50 values of the fruit extract against each enzyme were calculated using nonlinear regression analysis.
Figure 5Effect of the P. domestica subsp. syriaca fruit pulp extract on LPS-induced nitrite, IL-1β and PGE2 production. J774 cells were pretreated for 2 h with increasing concentrations of the extract (‘0.01’. ‘0.1’. ‘0.5’. ‘0.75’. and ‘1’ mg/mL) and then stimulated with LPS (‘10’ µg/mL) for 24 h (plus LPS). Effects of extract were also evaluated in absence of LPS (without LPS). Unstimulated J774 cells acted as a negative control (C). Nitrites (A,D), stable end products of NO, were measured in the supernatants by the Griess reaction, whereas IL-1β (B,E) and PGE2 (C,F) were measured by ELISA. Cell viability was evaluated by the mitochondrial-dependent reduction of MTT to formazan (G). ◦◦◦ p < 0.001 vs. unstimulated cells (C), p < 0.001 vs. unstimulated cells (C), *** p < 0.001 and ** p < 0.01 vs. LPS alone.