Literature DB >> 23001654

Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of illumina tags.

Yu Wang1, Hua-Fang Sheng, Yan He, Jin-Ya Wu, Yun-Xia Jiang, Nora Fung-Yee Tam, Hong-Wei Zhou.   

Abstract

Sediment, a special realm in aquatic environments, has high microbial diversity. While there are numerous reports about the microbial community in marine sediment, freshwater and intertidal sediment communities have been overlooked. The present study determined millions of Illumina reads for a comparison of bacterial communities in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments along Pearl River, China, using a technically consistent approach. Our results show that both taxon richness and evenness were the highest in freshwater sediment, medium in intertidal sediment, and lowest in marine sediment. The high number of sequences allowed the determination of a wide variety of bacterial lineages in all sediments for reliable statistical analyses. Principal component analysis showed that the three types of communities could be well separated from phylum to operational taxonomy unit (OTU) levels, and the OTUs from abundant to rare showed satisfactory resolutions. Statistical analysis (LEfSe) demonstrated that the freshwater sediment was enriched with Acidobacteria, Nitrospira, Verrucomicrobia, Alphaproteobacteria, and Betaproteobacteria. The intertidal sediment had a unique community with diverse primary producers (such as Chloroflexi, Bacillariophyta, Gammaproteobacteria, and Epsilonproteobacteria) as well as saprophytic microbes (such as Actinomycetales, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes). The marine sediment had a higher abundance of Gammaproteobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria, which were mainly involved in sulfate reduction in anaerobic conditions. These results are helpful for a systematic understanding of bacterial communities in natural sediment environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001654      PMCID: PMC3497375          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01821-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  37 in total

1.  Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale.

Authors:  Christian L Lauber; Micah Hamady; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data.

Authors:  Christopher Quince; Anders Lanzén; Thomas P Curtis; Russell J Davenport; Neil Hall; Ian M Head; L Fiona Read; William T Sloan
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates.

Authors:  Victor Kunin; Anna Engelbrektson; Howard Ochman; Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  The 'rare biosphere': a reality check.

Authors:  Jens Reeder; Rob Knight
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Sarah L Westcott; Thomas Ryabin; Justine R Hall; Martin Hartmann; Emily B Hollister; Ryan A Lesniewski; Brian B Oakley; Donovan H Parks; Courtney J Robinson; Jason W Sahl; Blaz Stres; Gerhard G Thallinger; David J Van Horn; Carolyn F Weber
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Global ecological patterns in uncultured Archaea.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Auguet; Albert Barberan; Emilio O Casamayor
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering.

Authors:  Susan M Huse; David Mark Welch; Hilary G Morrison; Mitchell L Sogin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.491

8.  A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses.

Authors:  Ryan T Jones; Michael S Robeson; Christian L Lauber; Micah Hamady; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Vertical distribution and anaerobic biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mangrove sediments in Hong Kong, South China.

Authors:  Chun-Hua Li; Hong-Wei Zhou; Yuk-Shan Wong; Nora Fung-Yee Tam
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Exploring microbial diversity and taxonomy using SSU rRNA hypervariable tag sequencing.

Authors:  Susan M Huse; Les Dethlefsen; Julie A Huber; David Mark Welch; David Mark Welch; David A Relman; Mitchell L Sogin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  171 in total

1.  Pyrosequencing-Based Seasonal Observation of Prokaryotic Diversity in Pneumatophore-Associated Soil of Avicennia marina.

Authors:  Dinesh Sanka Loganathachetti; Balamurugan Sadaiappan; Anbu Poosakkannu; Sundararaman Muthuraman
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Bacterial diversity in intestinal mucosa of antibiotic-associated diarrhea mice.

Authors:  Guozhen Xie; Kai Tan; Maijiao Peng; Chengxing Long; Dandan Li; Zhoujin Tan
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Evaluation of the treatment performance and microbial communities of a combined constructed wetland used to treat industrial park wastewater.

Authors:  Ming Xu; Weijing Liu; Chao Li; Chun Xiao; Lili Ding; Ke Xu; Jinju Geng; Hongqiang Ren
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Metagenomic Analysis of Subtidal Sediments from Polar and Subpolar Coastal Environments Highlights the Relevance of Anaerobic Hydrocarbon Degradation Processes.

Authors:  Fernando Espínola; Hebe M Dionisi; Sharon Borglin; Colin J Brislawn; Janet K Jansson; Walter P Mac Cormack; JoLynn Carroll; Sara Sjöling; Mariana Lozada
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Bacterial and archaeal communities in sediments of the north Chinese marginal seas.

Authors:  Jiwen Liu; Xiaoshou Liu; Min Wang; Yanlu Qiao; Yanfen Zheng; Xiao-Hua Zhang
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Short-duration hydrothermal fermentation of food waste: preparation of soil conditioner for amending organic-matter-impoverished arable soils.

Authors:  Jiaqi Hou; Mingxiao Li; Beidou Xi; Wenbing Tan; Jie Ding; Yan Hao; Dongming Liu; Hongliang Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Performance and microbial community dynamics of electricity-assisted sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for treatment of saline petrochemical wastewater.

Authors:  Jiaxin Liu; Shengnan Shi; Xiangyu Ji; Bei Jiang; Lanlan Xue; Meidi Li; Liang Tan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Bacterial community profile of contaminated soils in a typical antimony mining site.

Authors:  Ningning Wang; Suhuan Zhang; Mengchang He
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Impact of soil salinity on the microbial structure of halophyte rhizosphere microbiome.

Authors:  Salma Mukhtar; Babur Saeed Mirza; Samina Mehnaz; Muhammad Sajjad Mirza; Joan Mclean; Kauser Abdulla Malik
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The synergy effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis and exogenous calcium on bacterial community composition and growth performance of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in saline alkali soil.

Authors:  Dunwei Ci; Zhaohui Tang; Hong Ding; Li Cui; Guanchu Zhang; Shangxia Li; Liangxiang Dai; Feifei Qin; Zhimeng Zhang; Jishun Yang; Yang Xu
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.