| Literature DB >> 35052747 |
Andrea Maugeri1, Roberta Magnano San Lio1, Maria Clara La Rosa1, Giuliana Giunta2, Marco Panella2, Antonio Cianci2, Maria Anna Teresa Caruso3, Antonella Agodi1, Martina Barchitta1.
Abstract
Inadequate gestational weight gain (GWG) affects a growing number of pregnancies, influencing intrauterine environment and long-term health. Uncovering molecular mechanisms associated with GWG could be helpful to develop public health strategies for tackling this issue. Here, our study aimed to understand the relationship of DNA telomere length with weigh gain during pregnancy, using data and samples from the ongoing prospective "Mamma & Bambino" study (Catania, Italy). GWG was calculated according to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines. Relative telomere length was assessed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 252 samples of maternal leucocyte DNA (mlDNA) and 150 samples of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from amniotic fluid. We observed that relative telomere length of mlDNA seemed to weakly increase with GWG. In contrast, telomere length of cfDNA exhibited a U-shaped relationship with GWG. Women with adequate GWG showed longer telomere length than those who gained weight inadequately. Accordingly, the logistic regression model confirmed the association between telomere length of cfDNA and adequate GWG, after adjusting for potential confounders. Our findings suggest an early effect of GWG on telomere length of cfDNA, which could represent a molecular mechanism underpinning the effects of maternal behaviours on foetal well-being.Entities:
Keywords: aging; body mass index; pregnancy; telomere; weight gain
Year: 2021 PMID: 35052747 PMCID: PMC8773008 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Characteristics of women from the “Mamma & Bambino” cohort (n = 270) according to gestational weight gain categories.
| Characteristics | Overall | Reduced GWG | Adequate GWG | Excessive GWG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age b | 37.0 (4.0) | 37.0 (4.0) | 38.0 (4.0) | 37.0 (4.0) | 0.699 |
| Gestational age at sampling b | 16.0 (4.0) | 16.0 (4.0) | 16.0 (3.0) | 16.0 (2.0) | 0.953 |
| Educational level (%) | |||||
| Low | 17.8% | 16.5% | 16.8% | 20.5% | 0.038 |
| Medium | 47.8% | 40.7% | 45.5% | 59.0% | |
| High | 34.4% | 42.8% | 37.7% | 20.5% | |
| Working (%) | |||||
| Employment | 57.4% | 54.9% | 61.4% | 55.1% | 0.593 |
| Unemployment | 42.6% | 45.1% | 38.6% | 44.9% | |
| Smokers (%) | 20.5% | 15.4% | 20.0% | 27.3% | 0.216 |
| Having children (% yes) | 67.7% | 64.3% | 76.8% | 59.7% | 0.041 |
| Total energy intake b | 1750 (620) | 1667 (674) | 1752 (545) | 1858 (596) | 0.045 |
| MDS b | 4.0 (2.0) | 4.0 (2.0) | 4.0 (2.0) | 4.0 (2.0) | 0.102 |
| Pre-pregnancy weight b | 61.0 (15.2) | 62.0 (16.0) | 59.0 (13.0) | 64.5 (18.3) | 0.012 |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI b | 22.8 (5.1) | 22.8 (4.8) | 22.0 (3.8) | 25.0 (5.7) | 0.002 |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI categories | |||||
| Underweight | 6.7% | 6.6% | 6.9% | 6.4% | <0.001 |
| Normal weight | 64.1% | 68.1% | 77.2% | 42.3% | |
| Overweight | 17.4% | 9.9% | 8.9% | 37.2% | |
| Obese | 11.9% | 15.4% | 7.0% | 14.1% | |
| Weight at delivery b | 74.0 (15.0) | 68.5 (11.5) | 73.0 (12.7) | 82.0 (15.2) | <0.001 |
| Gestational age at delivery b | 39.0 (2.0) | 38.0 (2) | 39.0 (2) | 39.0 (2.0) | 0.383 |
ap-values are based on the Kruskal–Wallis test for quantitative variables, or chi-squared test for categorical variables b Data are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Abbreviations: GWG, gestational weight gain; MDS, Mediterranean Diet Score; BMI, body mass index.
Figure 1The relationship of gestational weight gain with relative telomere length. (A) shows the relationship of gestational weight gain with telomere length of mlDNA; (B) shows the box plots of telomere length of mlDNA by the tertile distribution of GWG; (C) shows the relationship of gestational weight gain with telomere length of cfDNA from amniotic fluid; (D) shows the box plots of telomere length of cfDNA by the tertile distribution of GWG. * p-value < 0.05 based on the Mann–Whitney or Kruskal–Wallis test.
Figure 2The relationship between categories of gestational weight gain and relative telomere length. (A) shows the box plots of telomere length of mlDNA according to GWG categories; (B) shows the box plots of telomere length of cfDNA according to GWG categories. * p-value < 0.05 based on the Mann–Whitney test.
Figure 3The relationship of weight gain at recruitment with relative telomere length. (A) shows the relationship of weight gain at recruitment with telomere length of mlDNA; (B) shows the relationship of weight gain at recruitment with telomere length of cfDNA from amniotic fluid.
Figure 4The comparison of telomere length of cfDNA from amniotic fluid between adequate and inadequate gestational weight gain. * p-value < 0.05 based on the Mann–Whitney U Test.