Literature DB >> 15252756

Microarray analysis of cell-free fetal DNA in amniotic fluid: a prenatal molecular karyotype.

Paige B Larrabee1, Kirby L Johnson, Ekaterina Pestova, Madhuri Lucas, Kim Wilber, Erik S LeShane, Umadevi Tantravahi, Janet M Cowan, Diana W Bianchi.   

Abstract

Metaphase karyotype analysis of fetal cells obtained by amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling is the current standard for prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis, particularly for the detection of trisomy 21. We previously demonstrated that large quantities of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) are easily extracted from amniotic fluid (AF). In this study, we explored potential clinical applications of AF cffDNA by testing its ability to hybridize to DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis. cffDNA isolated from 11 male fetuses showed significantly increased hybridization signals on SRY and decreased signals on X-chromosome markers, compared with female reference DNA. cffDNA isolated from six female fetuses showed the reverse when compared with male reference DNA. cffDNA from three fetuses with trisomy 21 had increased hybridization signals on the majority of the chromosome 21 markers, and cffDNA from a fetus with monosomy X (Turner syndrome) had decreased hybridization signals on most X-chromosome markers, compared with euploid female reference DNA. These results indicate that cffDNA extracted from AF can be analyzed using CGH microarrays to correctly identify fetal sex and aneuploidy. This technology facilitates rapid screening of samples for whole-chromosome changes and may augment standard karyotyping techniques by providing additional molecular information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15252756      PMCID: PMC1182026          DOI: 10.1086/423288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  14 in total

1.  Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays.

Authors:  J R Pollack; C M Perou; A A Alizadeh; M B Eisen; A Pergamenschikov; C F Williams; S S Jeffrey; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  The application of fluorescence in-situ hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  E Pergament
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 3.  The end of the beginning of chromosome ends.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-02-01

4.  Large amounts of cell-free fetal DNA are present in amniotic fluid.

Authors:  D W Bianchi; E S LeShane; J M Cowan
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Down syndrome and cell-free fetal DNA in archived maternal serum.

Authors:  Thomas Lee; Erik S LeShane; Geralyn M Messerlian; Jacob A Canick; Antonio Farina; Walter W Heber; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Size distributions of maternal and fetal DNA in maternal plasma.

Authors:  K C Allen Chan; Jun Zhang; Angela B Y Hui; Nathalie Wong; Tze K Lau; Tse N Leung; Kwok-Wai Lo; Dolly W S Huang; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Subtle chromosomal rearrangements in children with unexplained mental retardation.

Authors:  S J Knight; R Regan; A Nicod; S W Horsley; L Kearney; T Homfray; R M Winter; P Bolton; J Flint
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  High-throughput analysis of subtelomeric chromosome rearrangements by use of array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Joris A Veltman; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Bert H Eussen; Irene Janssen; Gerard Merkx; Brigitte van Cleef; Conny M van Ravenswaaij; Han G Brunner; Dominique Smeets; Ad Geurts van Kessel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  Rapid and simple prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome disorders: advantages and disadvantages of the molecular methods FISH and QF-PCR.

Authors:  Maj A Hultén; Seema Dhanjal; Barbara Pertl
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the genomewide detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Lisenka E L M Vissers; Bert B A de Vries; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Irene M Janssen; Ton Feuth; Chik On Choy; Huub Straatman; Walter van der Vliet; Erik H L P G Huys; Anke van Rijk; Dominique Smeets; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Nine V Knoers; Ineke van der Burgt; Pieter J de Jong; Han G Brunner; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Cell-free fetal nucleic acids in amniotic fluid.

Authors:  L Hui; D W Bianchi
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Extremely skewed X-chromosome inactivation is increased in pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Elif Uz; Ismail Dolen; Atakan R Al; Tayfun Ozcelik
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH.

Authors:  L Rickman; H Fiegler; C Shaw-Smith; R Nash; V Cirigliano; G Voglino; B L Ng; C Scott; J Whittaker; M Adinolfi; N P Carter; M Bobrow
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Microarray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)-based prenatal diagnosis for chromosome abnormalities using cell-free fetal DNA in amniotic fluid.

Authors:  Shoko Miura; Kiyonori Miura; Hideaki Masuzaki; Noriko Miyake; Koh-Ichiro Yoshiura; Nadiya Sosonkina; Naoki Harada; Osamu Shimokawa; Daisuke Nakayama; Shuichiro Yoshimura; Naomichi Matsumoto; Norio Niikawa; Tadayuki Ishimaru
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Method for extraction of high-quantity and -quality cell-free DNA from amniotic fluid.

Authors:  Olav Lapaire; Kirby L Johnson; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

6.  The future of prenatal cytogenetic diagnostics: a personal perspective.

Authors:  Charles Lee
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 7.  Tracking fetal development through molecular analysis of maternal biofluids.

Authors:  Andrea G Edlow; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-04-19

8.  Microfluidic digital PCR enables rapid prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy.

Authors:  H Christina Fan; Yair J Blumenfeld; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Jane Chueh; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases.

Authors:  Ignatia B Van den Veyver; Ankita Patel; Chad A Shaw; Amber N Pursley; Sung-Hae L Kang; Marcia J Simovich; Patricia A Ward; Sandra Darilek; Anthony Johnson; Sarah E Neill; Weimin Bi; Lisa D White; Christine M Eng; James R Lupski; Sau Wai Cheung; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Circulating nucleic acids in plasma and serum: applications in diagnostic techniques for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Peter B Gahan
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.