| Literature DB >> 36079896 |
Gaia Maria Anelli1, Francesca Parisi2, Laura Sarno3, Ottavia Fornaciari1, Annunziata Carlea3, Chiara Coco1, Matteo Della Porta1, Nunzia Mollo4, Paola Maria Villa2, Maurizio Guida3, Roberta Cazzola1, Ersilia Troiano5, Monica Pasotti5, Graziella Volpi5, Laura Vetrani5, Manuela Maione5, Irene Cetin1,2.
Abstract
Background: Maternal nutrition represents a critical risk factor for adverse health outcomes in both mother and offspring. We aimed to investigate associations between maternal nutritional habits, biomarker status, and pregnancy outcome among Italian healthy normal-weight pregnancies.Entities:
Keywords: GIFt study; RBCs folate; hepcidin; maternal dietary patterns; maternal nutrition; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079896 PMCID: PMC9460547 DOI: 10.3390/nu14173631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Study Design.
Maternal characteristics and biomarker concentrations in the total study population and subgroups.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Maternal Age, years | 31.8 ± 4.3 | 31.7 ± 4.5 | 31.9 ± 4.1 | ns | |
| Maternal pregestational BMI, kg/m2 | 21.9 ± 2.7 | 21.6 ± 2.8 | 22.3 ± 2.7 | ns | |
| Educational Level, % | low | 18 (9.9%) | 6 (7.0%) | 12 (12.6%) | ns |
| intermediate | 55 (30.4%) | 32 (37.2%) | 23 (24.2%) | ||
| high | 108 (59.7%) | 48 (55.8%) | 60 (63.2%) | ||
| Working Status, % | unemployed | 31 (17.4%) | 5 (6.0%) | 26 (27.4%) | <0.001 |
| worker | 147 (82.6%) | 78 (94.0%) | 69 (72.6%) | ||
| Marital Status, % | not married | 64 (35.8%) | 43 (50.6%) | 21 (22.3%) | <0.001 |
| married | 115 (64.2%) | 42 (49.4%) | 73 (77.7%) | ||
| Supplement Use, % | none | 19 (10.9%) | 12 (14.6%) | 7 (7.6%) | <0.001 |
| iron/folic acid | 37 (21.3%) | 5 (6.1%) | 32 (34.8%) | ||
| multivitamin | 118 (67.8%) | 65 (79.3%) | 53 (57.6%) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| RBCs Folate, ng/mL | 595.2 ± 134.2 | 521.3 ± 123.5 | 633.0 ± 104.9 | <0.001 | |
| Serum Vitamin D, ug/L | 22.1 ± 7.6 | 21.2 ± 7.4 | 22.9 ± 7.7 | ns | |
| Plasma Hpn-25, ng/mL | 4.4 ± 2.9 | 4.9 ± 3.0 | 4.0 ± 2.7 | 0.03 | |
| Plasma TAC, mM | 2.8 ± 1.4 | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 2.7 ± 1.3 | ns | |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data were analyzed according to their distribution with independent samples Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test or Chi-Squared test for independence (with Yates continuity correction) or Fisher’s exact-test; statistical significance compared to Milan subgroup. Statistical significance: p < 0.05. BMI: Body Mass Index; RBCs: Red Blood Cells; Hpn-25: hepcidin mature form; TAC: Total Antioxidant Capacity.
Delivery outcomes in the total study population and subgroups.
| Delivery Outcome at T4 | TOTAL STUDY | MILAN | NAPLES | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal GWG, kg | 12.6 ± 4.2 | 13.4 ± 4.3 | 12.0 ± 4.0 | 0.05 |
| GA at Delivery, weeks | 39.6 ± 1.2 | 39.8 ± 1.2 | 39.5 ± 1.2 | 0.02 |
| Placental Weight, gr | 541.4 ± 104.2 | 541.5 ± 110.5 | 542.4 ± 99.8 | ns |
| N/P weight ratio | 6.1 ± 1.0 | 6.1 ± 1.1 | 6.1 ± 0.9 | ns |
| Neonatal Weight, gr | 3231.7 ± 454.23 | 3232.7 ± 503.9 | 3225.2 ± 406.2 | ns |
| NPI, gr/cm3 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | ns |
| Neonatal Length, cm | 49.2 ± 2.1 | 49.4 ± 2.3 | 49.1 ± 1.9 | ns |
| Neonatal HC, cm | 34.3 ± 1.3 | 34.1 ± 1.3 | 34.5 ± 1.3 | 0.02 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data were analyzed according to their distribution with independent samples Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test; statistical significance compared to Milan group. Statistical significance: p < 0.05. GWG: Gestational Weight Gain according to IOM guidelines; GA: Gestational Age; N: Neonatal; P: Placental; NPI: Neonatal Ponderal Index: {[neonatal weight (gr)/neonatal length (cm)]3} × 100 [33]; HC: Head Circumference.
Figure 2Energy and nutrients intakes referred to Italian LARN recommendations. Energy and nutrient intakes of the study population compared to the Italian LARN references. The average intake was calculated as bromatological data resulting from the analysis of the daily diaries weighed over 7 days (7-DR diaries).
Dietary patterns extraction from FFQ analysis: relation between food groups and dietary patterns expressed by factor loadings.
| ‘HIGH MEAT, ANIMAL FATS, GRAIN’ DP | ‘HIGH FISH, FRUIT, NUTS’ DP | ‘HIGH EGG and SWEETS, LOW LEGUMES’ DP | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 11.7 | 11.4 | 10.3 |
|
| 0.057 | 0.508 | −0.050 |
|
| 0.548 | −0.210 | −0.324 |
|
|
| −0.027 | −0.207 |
|
| 0.107 | 0.448 | −0.280 |
|
| 0.286 | 0.022 |
|
|
| 0.563 | −0.113 | 0.114 |
|
|
| −0.023 | −0.255 |
|
| 0.177 |
| −0.210 |
|
| 0.164 | 0.356 |
|
|
| 0.151 |
| 0.112 |
|
| 0.053 |
| 0.261 |
|
| 0.038 | 0.362 | −0.098 |
|
|
| −0.170 | 0.399 |
|
| 0.334 | −0.013 |
|
|
| 0.470 | −0.169 | 0.164 |
The factor loadings indicate how much every food item correlates with the extracted dietary patterns. The factor loadings with the highest absolute value were used for labelling and highlighted in bold type. DP: dietary pattern.
Multivariate analysis of the associations between maternal dietary patterns, biomarkers and delivery outcomes in the total study population.
| β (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Vitamin D, ug/L | −3.9 (−6.9; −0.9) * | |
| Hpn-25, ng/mL | 0.3 (0.0; 0.5) * | ||
| GA, weeks | F | −0.5 (−0.9; −0.0) * | |
| M | −0.3 (−0.7; −0.2) | ||
|
| Placental Weight, gr | −8.3 (−15.7; −0.8) * | |
|
| Neonatal Weight, gr | 31.1 (9.2; 53.10) ** | |
The model includes full adjustment for potential confounders (maternal age, pregestational BMI, education, working status, parity, vitamin supplement use, geographical area). The dietary pattern analysis includes the adjustment for energy intake. The biomarker analysis includes adjustment for gestational age at T3. The analysis on delivery outcomes includes further adjustment for gestational age at delivery and GWG at term. Effect estimates indicates the change amount in the dependent variable for every unit increase in the independent one. Statistical significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. CI: confidence interval.