Literature DB >> 23584102

Activation of phonological competitors in visual search.

Frauke Görges1, Frank Oppermann, Jörg D Jescheniak, Herbert Schriefers.   

Abstract

Recently, Meyer, Belke, Telling and Humphreys (2007) reported that competitor objects with homophonous names (e.g., boy) interfere with identifying a target object (e.g., buoy) in a visual search task, suggesting that an object name's phonology becomes automatically activated even in situations in which participants do not have the intention to speak. The present study explored the generality of this finding by testing a different phonological relation (rhyming object names, e.g., cat-hat) and by varying details of the experimental procedure. Experiment 1 followed the procedure by Meyer et al. Participants were familiarized with target and competitor objects and their names at the beginning of the experiment and the picture of the target object was presented prior to the search display on each trial. In Experiment 2, the picture of the target object presented prior to the search display was replaced by its name. In Experiment 3, participants were not familiarized with target and competitor objects and their names at the beginning of the experiment. A small interference effect from phonologically related competitors was obtained in Experiments 1 and 2 but not in Experiment 3, suggesting that the way the relevant objects are introduced to participants affects the chances of observing an effect from phonologically related competitors. Implications for the information flow in the conceptual-lexical system are discussed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23584102     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  9 in total

1.  Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.

Authors:  Orna Peleg; Lee Edelist; Zohar Eviatar; Dafna Bergerbest
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

2.  Speakers of different languages process the visual world differently.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Viorica Marian
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-06

3.  Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.

Authors:  Stephen C Walenchok; Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Language is activated by visual input regardless of memory demands or capacity.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Sayuri Hayakawa; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2022-01-10

5.  What does that Picture Sound Like to You? Oculomotor Evidence for Phonological Competition in Visual Search.

Authors:  Stephen C Walenchok; Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013

6.  Long-lasting semantic interference effects in object naming are not necessarily conceptually mediated.

Authors:  Emma Riley; Katie L McMahon; Greig de Zubicaray
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-07

7.  Cascadedness in Chinese written word production.

Authors:  Qingqing Qu; Markus F Damian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-25

8.  Differences between Dyslexic and Non-Dyslexic Children in the Performance of Phonological Visual-Auditory Recognition Tasks: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Aimé Tiadi; Magali Seassau; Christophe-Loïc Gerard; Maria Pia Bucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How a picture becomes a word: individual differences in the development of language-mediated visual search.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Sayuri Hayakawa; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-01-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.