Literature DB >> 34988629

Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: identification and optimisation of factors influencing prediction accuracy and comparison to genomic selection.

Pauline Robert1,2,3,4, Jérôme Auzanneau3, Ellen Goudemand4, François-Xavier Oury2, Bernard Rolland5, Emmanuel Heumez6, Sophie Bouchet2, Jacques Le Gouis2, Renaud Rincent7,8.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Phenomic selection is a promising alternative or complement to genomic selection in wheat breeding. Models combining spectra from different environments maximise the predictive ability of grain yield and heading date of wheat breeding lines. Phenomic selection (PS) is a recent breeding approach similar to genomic selection (GS) except that genotyping is replaced by near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. PS can potentially account for non-additive effects and has the major advantage of being low cost and high throughput. Factors influencing GS predictive abilities have been intensively studied, but little is known about PS. We tested and compared the abilities of PS and GS to predict grain yield and heading date from several datasets of bread wheat lines corresponding to the first or second years of trial evaluation from two breeding companies and one research institute in France. We evaluated several factors affecting PS predictive abilities including the possibility of combining spectra collected in different environments. A simple H-BLUP model predicted both traits with prediction ability from 0.26 to 0.62 and with an efficient computation time. Our results showed that the environments in which lines are grown had a crucial impact on predictive ability based on the spectra acquired and was specific to the trait considered. Models combining NIR spectra from different environments were the best PS models and were at least as accurate as GS in most of the datasets. Furthermore, a GH-BLUP model combining genotyping and NIR spectra was the best model of all (prediction ability from 0.31 to 0.73). We demonstrated also that as for GS, the size and the composition of the training set have a crucial impact on predictive ability. PS could therefore replace or complement GS for efficient wheat breeding programs.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bread wheat; Genomic selection (GS); Genomic-like omics-based (GLOB) prediction; Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS); Phenomic selection (PS); Plant breeding

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34988629     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-021-04005-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  37 in total

1.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives.

Authors:  José Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Jaime Cuevas; Osval Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquín; Gustavo de Los Campos; Juan Burgueño; Juan M González-Camacho; Sergio Pérez-Elizalde; Yoseph Beyene; Susanne Dreisigacker; Ravi Singh; Xuecai Zhang; Manje Gowda; Manish Roorkiwal; Jessica Rutkoski; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Transcriptome-Based Prediction of Complex Traits in Maize.

Authors:  Christina B Azodi; Jeremy Pardo; Robert VanBuren; Gustavo de Los Campos; Shin-Han Shiu
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Economical optimization of a breeding scheme by selective phenotyping of the calibration set in a multi-trait context: application to bread making quality.

Authors:  S Ben-Sadoun; R Rincent; J Auzanneau; F X Oury; B Rolland; E Heumez; C Ravel; G Charmet; S Bouchet
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Genome-Assisted Prediction of Quantitative Traits Using the R Package sommer.

Authors:  Giovanny Covarrubias-Pazaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Fortune telling: metabolic markers of plant performance.

Authors:  Olivier Fernandez; Maria Urrutia; Stéphane Bernillon; Catherine Giauffret; François Tardieu; Jacques Le Gouis; Nicolas Langlade; Alain Charcosset; Annick Moing; Yves Gibon
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.290

10.  BWGS: A R package for genomic selection and its application to a wheat breeding programme.

Authors:  Gilles Charmet; Louis-Gautier Tran; Jérôme Auzanneau; Renaud Rincent; Sophie Bouchet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Interest of phenomic prediction as an alternative to genomic prediction in grapevine.

Authors:  Charlotte Brault; Juliette Lazerges; Agnès Doligez; Miguel Thomas; Martin Ecarnot; Pierre Roumet; Yves Bertrand; Gilles Berger; Thierry Pons; Pierre François; Loïc Le Cunff; Patrice This; Vincent Segura
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.827

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.