| Literature DB >> 34945615 |
Izabela Jasicka-Misiak1, Mariia Shanaida2, Nataliia Hudz1,3, Piotr Paweł Wieczorek4.
Abstract
The yield of essential oils in plants is not high and postdistillation wastes rich in phenolic compounds could be used to enhance the profitability of essential oil-bearing plants. The aim of the study was to evaluate polyphenols in a dry extract obtained from the postdistillation waste of the American basil (Ocimum americanum L.) herb, and to conduct the screening of its pharmacological activities. Rosmarinic acid, caffeic acid and rutin were identified in the extract using high-performance thin-layer chromatography. The high-performance liquid chromatography analysis found the presence of a plethora of polyphenols in the extract. Rosmarinic acid, luteolin-7-O-glucoside and rutin were as the main compounds. The total phenolic content in the extract was 106.31 mg GAE/g and free radical scavenging activity against 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl evaluated as IC50 was 0.298 mg/mL. The tested extract dose-dependently decreased the paw edema in rats, suggesting its potent anti-inflammatory property. The acute toxicity study indicates its safety. Thus, the O. americanum hydrodistilled residue by-product is the promising source of biologically active compounds with significant antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects.Entities:
Keywords: American basil; anti-inflammatory activity; antioxidant activity; herb; hydrodistilled residue by-product; polyphenols; safety
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945615 PMCID: PMC8701984 DOI: 10.3390/foods10123063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Gradient of the mobile phases in HPLC-analysis [18].
| Time (min) | Mobile Phase A (Vol, %) | Mobile Phase B (Vol, %) |
|---|---|---|
| 0–5 | 95 | 5 |
| 5–35 | 95 → 75 | 5 → 25 |
| 35–40 | 75 | 25 |
| 40–60 | 75 → 50 | 25 → 50 |
| 60–65 | 50 → 20 | 50 → 80 |
| 65–70 | 20 | 80 |
| 70–85 | 95 | 5 |
Figure 1Typical HPTLC chromatograms of the ODE test solution (1–3) and RS of polyphenol (A: RT, RAc, and caffeic acid with increasing R) before (a) and after (b) derivatization at λ = 366 nm.
Contents of polyphenols in the ODE evaluated by the HPLC.
| Compound | Retention Time, min | Content, mg/g of Dry Extract |
|---|---|---|
| Neochlorogenic acid | 14.8 | 0.31 ± 0.01 |
| Catechin | 19.5 | 0.90 ± 0.04 |
| Chlorogenic acid | 20.4 | 0.95 ± 0.03 |
| Caffeic acid | 21.6 | 4.13 ± 0.11 |
| Rutin | 30.9 | 11.20 ± 0.26 |
| Hyperoside | 31.6 | 6.34 ± 0.12 |
| Ferulic acid | 32.3 | 8.21 ± 0.09 |
| Luteolin-7- | 33.1 | 17.22 ± 0.49 |
| Apigenin-7- | 36.8 | 5.64 ± 0.12 |
| Rosmarinic acid | 37.8 | 78.70 ± 1.13 |
| Acacetin-7- | 45.8 | 3.51 ± 0.08 |
| Quercetin | 46.6 | 2.21 ± 0.06 |
| Luteolin | 47.0 | 7.82 ± 0.14 |
| Apigenin | 52.4 | 1.94 ± 0.05 |
Figure 2The typical HPLC chromatogram of polyphenols in the ODE (at λ = 330 nm): 1—neochlorogenic acid; 2—catechin; 3—chlorogenic acid; 4—caffeic acid; 5—RT; 6—hyperoside; 7—ferulic acid; 8—L-7; 9—apigenin-7-O-glucoside; 10—RAc; 11—acacetin-7-O-glucoside; 12—quercetin; 13—luteolin; 14—apigenin.
Anti-exudative effect of the ODE on paw edema in rats induced by carrageenan.
| Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | Increase in Paw Oedema | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After 1 h | After 3 h | After 6 h | |||||
| Diff | % AIE | Diff | % AIE | Diff | % AIE | ||
| Control | - | 0.34 ± 0.03 | - | 0.41 ± 0.02 | - | 0.38 ± 0.02 | - |
| ODE | 25 | 0.29 ± 0.02 2 | 14.71 | 0.33 ± 0.03 2 | 19.5 | 0.34 ± 0.02 1,2 | 10.53 |
| 50 | 0.27 ± 0.03 2 | 23.53 | 0.30 ± 0.02 1,2 | 26.83 | 0.31 ± 0.01 1 | 18.42 | |
| 100 | 0.24 ± 0.01 1,2 | 29.41 | 0.28 ± 0.01 1,2 | 31.71 | 0.29 ± 0.02 1 | 23.68 | |
| Diclofenac | 8 | 0.18 ± 0.02 1 | 47.05 | 0.21 ± 0.03 1 | 48.78 | 0.29 ± 0.01 1 | 23.68 |
Diff—difference in paw volume of the rats before and after injection of carrageenan; 1—significantly different compared to untreated control (p ≤ 0.05); 2—significantly different compared to Diclofenac group (p ≤ 0.05).