| Literature DB >> 33081385 |
Nataliia Hudz1, Ewa Makowicz2, Mariia Shanaida3, Marietta Białoń2, Izabela Jasicka-Misiak2, Oksana Yezerska1, Liudmyla Svydenko4, Piotr Paweł Wieczorek2.
Abstract
Winter Savory (Satureja montana L.) has been used in traditional medicine and as a spice or natural food preservative in the Mediterranean region for centuries. In this paper, some technological and analytical aspects of the S. montana tinctures development and an evaluation of the essential oil composition are provided. The total phenolic and flavonoid contents and phenolic compounds profile analyzed spectrophotometrically and by high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), respectively, were evaluated in the developed tinctures. The results showed that the tinctures prepared from the S. montana herb by maceration or remaceration are rich in polyphenols, and there is an influence of the technological factors (particle size and extraction mode) on the total phenolic and flavonoid contents. Caffeic, rosmarinic, and chlorogenic acids, (-)-catechin and rutin were identified in the tinctures using the HPTLC method. p-Thymol (81.79%) revealed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was the predominant compound of the essential oil of this plant. Thus, the high contents of polyphenols and flavonoids in the developed tinctures and p-thymol among the volatile components of the S. montana essential oil could indicate the promising antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of these herbal preparations. The obtained results are a ground for the organization of the manufacture of the S. montana tincture and essential oil with the purpose of performing preclinical studies.Entities:
Keywords: Satureja montana; essential oil; flavonoids; polyphenols; tincture
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33081385 PMCID: PMC7587570 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25204763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Calibration curves of rutin trihydrate and gallic acid for the determination of TPC in the S. montana tinctures.
Statistical data for the regression equation of the absorbance dependence on the reaction time in the TPC analysis of the S. montana tinctures.
| T2 | T1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time, min | Mean Absorbance ± SD | Correlation Equation, R2 | Time, min | Mean Absorbance ± SD | Correlation Equation, R2 | Time, min | Mean Absorbance ± SD | Correlation Equation, R2 |
| 30 | 0.426 ± 0.009 | – | 32 | 0.751 ± 0.039 | – | 34 | 0.781 ± 0.035 | – |
| – | – | – | 47 | 0.769 ± 0.032 | y = 0.0012x + 0.7126 | – | – | – |
| 65 | 0.436 ± 0.008 | y = 0.0003x + 0.4174 | 70 | 0.774 ± 0.025 | y = 0.0006x + 0.7362 | 62 | 0.784 ± 0.028 | y = 0.0001x + 0.7774 |
| 92 | 0.439 ± 0.006 | y = 0.0002x + 0.4204 | 83 | 0.774 ± 0.022 | y = 0.0004x + 0.7428 | 80 | 0.788 ± 0.027 | y = 0.0001x + 0.7758 |
| – | – | – | 102 | 0.775 ± 0.019 | y = 0.0003x + 0.7486 | – | – | – |
| 118 | 0.438 ± 0.007 | y = 0.0001x +0.4241 | 122 | 0.773 ± 0.017 | y = 0.0002x + 0.754 | 123 | 0.786 ± 0.024 | y = 6E-05x + 0.7803 |
| 147 | 0.438 ± 0.024 | y = 9E-05x + 0.4269 | 136 | 0.776 ± 0.015 | y = 0.0002x + 0.756 | – | – | – |
The TPC in the elaborated tinctures and herb of S. montana.
| Active Substance | TPC, X ± SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| with Reference to Gallic Acid | with Reference to Rutin | |||
| T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | |
| Tincture, mg/L | 2441.1 ± 78.8 | 1255 ± 23.0 | 4914.5 ± 158.74 | 2525.1 ± 46.21 |
| Herb, mg/g | 22.7 ± 0.73 | 13.0 ± 0.24 | 45.63 ± 1.47 | 26.16 ± 0.48 |
Figure 2Calibration curve of rutin trihydrate for the determination of TFC.
Figure 3Differential spectra of rutin (R2) (50 mg/L) and Satureja montana tincture T5 (Sm308).
The TFC in the tinctures (mg/L) and herb (mg/g) of S. montana and stability studies.
| Tincture | TFC, X ± RSD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediately after Maceration | In 2 Weeks of Storage | In 6 Months of Storage | |
| T1 | 943.88 mg/L ± 2.44% | - | - |
| T2 | 613.4 mg/L ± 2.84% | - | - |
| T3 | 614.7 mg/L ± 5.22% | - | 655.6 mg/L ± 2.41% |
| T4 | 655.6 mg/L ± 1.36% | - | 655.6 mg/L ± 0.80% |
| T5 | 994.1 mg/L ± 2.09% | 853.8 mg/L ± 3.19% | 973.8 mg/L ± 1.44% |
| T6 | 508.0 mg/L ± 0.60% | - | - |
| T7 | 523.8 mg/L ± 2.01% | - | - |
Statistical analysis for comparison of the total flavonoid content (TFC) in S. montata herb.
| No. | Comparable Samples | Comparable Mean Values of TFC, mg/g | Standard Deviations (SD) of Mean Values |
|
| t | Conclusion 1 | Conclusion 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| SD1 | SD2 | ||||||||
| 1 | 7 | 6 | 5.85 | 5.15 | 0.118 | 0.036 | 0.70 | 0.008 | 9.85 | The two means are statistically significantly different. There is a clear influence of the particle size on the extraction degree of flavonoids | |
| 2 | 7 | 3 | 5.85 | 6.38 | 0.118 | 0.333 | 0.53 | 0.062 | 2.62 | The two means are equal. There is no effect of the storage time of the herbal substance on the extraction degree of flavonoids | |
| 3 | 5 | 4 | 9.47 | 6.24 | 0.200 | 0.085 | 3.23 | 0.024 | 25.84 | The two means are statistically significantly different. There is a clear influence of the particle size on the extraction degree of flavonoids | |
| 4 | 2 | 4 | 6.36 | 6.24 | 0.18 | 0.085 | 0.08 | 0.020 | 0.70 | The two means are equal. There is no effect of the herb collection year on the extraction degree of flavonoids (the particle size of 3–5 mm) | |
| 5 | 1 | 5 | 8.76 | 9.47 | 0.213 | 0.200 | 0.71 | 0.043 | −4.20 | The two means are equal. There is an effect of the herb collection year on the extraction degree of flavonoids (the particle size of 1–3 mm) | |
| 6 | 1 | 2 | 8.76 | 6.36 | 0.213 | 0.180 | 2.40 | 0.039 | 14.91 | The two means are statistically significantly different. There is a clear influence of the particle size on the extraction degree of flavonoids | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 6.38 | 6.81 | 0.333 | 0.164 | 0.43 | 0.069 | 2.01 | The two means are equal. There is no effect of the storage time of the tincture on the TFC | |
| 8 | 5 | 5 | 9.47 | 9.27 | 0.200 | 0.180 | 0.20 | 0.036 | 1.29 | The two means are equal. There is no effect of the storage time of the tincture on the TFC | |
| 9 | 5 | 5 | 9.47 | 8.13 | 0.200 | 0.259 | 1.34 | 0.053 | 7.05 | The two means are statistically significantly different. There is an effect of the storage time of the tincture on the TFC | |
| 10 | 5 | 5 | 8.13 | 9.27 | 0.259 | 0.180 | 1.14 | 0.050 | 6.33 | The two means are statistically significantly different. There is an effect of the storage time of the tincture on the TFC | |
Kinetics of the extraction process for the tinctures 1 and 2.
| Days of Extraction | Absorbance | TFC, mg/L | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | |
| 1 day | 0.163 ± 0.006 | 0.121 ± 0.006 | 314.50 ± 23.02 | 237.08 ± 23.02 |
| 4 days | 0.309 ± 0.008 | 0.254 ± 0.003 | 585.60 ± 26.73 | 483.45 ± 17.45 |
| 5 days | 0.368 ± 0.002 | 0.303 ± 0.025 | 695.10 ± 15.60 | 574.42 ± 58.30 |
| 7 days | 0.502 ± 0.006 | 0.334 ± 0.003 | 943.88 ± 23.02 | 613.41 ± 17.45 |
Average Rf values of the reference standards and their respective fluorescence colours.
| Reference Standard | Rf
| Colour of Band | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Derivatisation | After Derivatisation | ||||
| 254 nm | 366 nm | 254 nm | 366 nm | ||
| Apigenin | 0.58 | Black | Black | Deep yellow | Deep yellow |
| Quercetin | 0.56 | Yellow | Yellow | Yellow | Yellow |
| Luteolin | 0.54 | Black | Black | Deep yellow | Deep yellow |
| Caffeic acid | 0.52 | Blue | Blue | Blue | Blue |
| Rosmarinic acid | 0.34 | Blue | Light blue | Blue | Light blue |
| (–)-Catechin | 0.25 | – | – | Deep black | Deep black |
| Chlorogenic acid | 0.09 | Blue | Light blue | Blue | Light blue |
| Rutin | 0.03 | Black | Black | Deep yellow | Deep yellow |
Figure 4HPTLC fingerprints of Satureja montana tincture under 366 nm before (a) and after (b) derivatisation with 1% of AlCl3; SM—S. montana tincture; 1—quercetin; 2—luteolin; 3—rutin; 4—chlorogenic acid; 5—rosmarinic acid; 6—caffeic acid; 7—apigenin; (c) (–)-catechin.
Figure 5HPTLC fingerprints of Satureja montana tincture under 254 nm before (a) and after (b) derivatisation with 1% of AlCl3; SM—S. montana tincture; 1—quercetin; 2—luteolin; 3—rutin; 4—chlorogenic acid; 5—rosmarinic acid; 6—caffeic acid; 7—apigenin.
Figure 6Satureja montana tincture and identified standards profiles on HPTLC chromatogram pictures at 366 nm after derivatisation; *—not possible unambiguous identification due to low separation.
Chemical composition of the Satureja montana essential oil determined by GC-MS.
| No. | Component | IR | Area, % | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1-octen-3-ol | 981 | 1.91 | 0.13 |
| 2 | terpinolene | 1017 | 0.10 | 0.01 |
| 3 | 1025 | 1.26 | 0.07 | |
| 4 | eucalyptol | 1032 | 0.69 | 0.04 |
| 5 | 1060 | 1.65 | 0.06 | |
| 6 | cis- | 1069 | 1.21 | 0.07 |
| 7 | trans- | 1089 | 0.31 | 0.01 |
| 8 | linalool | 1099 | 2.09 | 0.21 |
| 9 | thujone | 1118 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
| 10 | trans- | 1124 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| 11 | camphor | 1147 | 0.22 | 0.00 |
| 12 | endo-borneol | 1168 | 0.58 | 0.01 |
| 13 | terpinen-4-ol | 1179 | 1.07 | 0.04 |
| 14 | 1193 | 0.31 | 0.02 | |
| 15 | isothymol methyl ether | 1237 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
| 16 | thymol methyl ether | 1246 | 0.27 | 0.01 |
| 17 | thymoquinone | 1256 | 0.46 | 0.05 |
| 18 | linalyl acetate | 1263 | 0.14 | 0.05 |
| 19 | carvacrol | 1289 | 0.05 | 0.00 |
| 20 | thymol | 1295 | 0.65 | 0.03 |
| 21 | 1313 | 81.79 | 0.55 | |
| 22 | carvacrol acetate | 1375 | 0.23 | 0.01 |
| 23 | caryophyllene | 1422 | 0.89 | 0.02 |
| 24 | 1432 | 0.12 | 0.00 | |
| 25 | aromadendrene | 1442 | 0.39 | 0.02 |
| 26 | 1479 | 0.26 | 0.02 | |
| 27 | germacrene D | 1484 | 0.61 | 0.02 |
| 28 | ledene | 1498 | 0.95 | 0.01 |
| 29 | 1502 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
| 30 | 1510 | 0.63 | 0.10 | |
| 31 | 1517 | 0.18 | 0.03 | |
| 32 | 1526 | 0.35 | 0.02 | |
| 33 | spathulenol | 1584 | 0.24 | 0.02 |
| 34 | caryophyllene oxide | 1589 | 0.20 | 0.02 |
Figure 7GC-MS chromatogram of the Satureja montana essential oil.
Figure 8Chemical structures of the thymol isomers.
Characteristics of the developed tinctures of Satureja montana herb.
| Tincture | Year of Herb Collection | Time of a Tincture Preparation | Date of a Tincture Preparation | Ratio of Herbal Substance to a Tincture | Particle Size, mm | Extraction Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 2017 | 7 days | June 2018 | 1:9.3 | 1–3 | maceration |
| T2 | 2017 | 1:10.4 | 3–5 | -//- | ||
| T3 | 2018 | 30 h | August 2019 | 1:10.4 | 1–3 | remaceration |
| T4 | 2018 | 7 days | 1:9.5 | 3–5 | maceration | |
| T5 | 2018 | 1:9.5 | 1–3 | -//- | ||
| T6 | 2018 | 30 h | March 2020 | 1:10.1 | 3–5 | remaceration |
| T7 | 2018 | 1:11.2 | 1–3 |