| Literature DB >> 34944608 |
María Jesús Rodrigo1,2,3, Manuel Subías1,2, Alberto Montolío4,5, Silvia Méndez-Martínez1,2, Teresa Martínez-Rincón1,2, Lorena Arias1,2, David García-Herranz6,7,8, Irene Bravo-Osuna8, Julian Garcia-Feijoo9, Luis Pablo1,2,3, José Cegoñino4,5, Rocio Herrero-Vanrell3,8, Ana Carretero10,11,12, Jesus Ruberte10,11,12, Elena Garcia-Martin1,2,3, Amaya Pérez Del Palomar4,5.
Abstract
Glaucoma causes blindness due to the progressive death of retinal ganglion cells. The immune response chronically and subclinically mediates a homeostatic role. In current clinical practice, it is impossible to analyse neuroinflammation non-invasively. However, analysis of vitreous images using optical coherence tomography detects the immune response as hyperreflective opacities. This study monitors vitreous parainflammation in two animal models of glaucoma, comparing both healthy controls and sexes over six months. Computational analysis characterizes in vivo the hyperreflective opacities, identified histologically as hyalocyte-like Iba-1+ (microglial marker) cells. Glaucomatous eyes showed greater intensity and number of vitreous opacities as well as dynamic fluctuations in the percentage of activated cells (50-250 microns2) vs. non-activated cells (10-50 microns2), isolated cells (10 microns2) and complexes (>250 microns2). Smaller opacities (isolated cells) showed the highest mean intensity (intracellular machinery), were the most rounded at earlier stages (recruitment) and showed the greatest change in orientation (motility). Study of vitreous parainflammation could be a biomarker of glaucoma onset and progression.Entities:
Keywords: animal models; biomedical imaging; glaucoma; image analysis and processing; inflammation; optical coherence tomography; vitreous body
Year: 2021 PMID: 34944608 PMCID: PMC8698891 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9121792
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1Methodology of the custom program implemented in Matlab (version R218a, Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). From an OCT (HR-OCT Spectralis, Heidelberg® Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) image of a right eye with the MEPI model at 6 weeks, VIT/RPE relative intensity was quantified after vitreous and RPE segmentation. To analyse the opacities/cells, it is necessary to remove the background noise of the vitreous. Our denoising filter was applied to the grey scale image intensity in those regions identified in the binary image. Therefore, intensity was obtained from the grey scale image, while area, eccentricity and orientation were computed from the binary image. Abbreviations: OCT: optical coherence tomography; RE: right eye; MEPI: glaucoma model induced by sclerosing the episcleral veins; VIT: vitreous; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
Figure 2Intraocular pressure curves (right eyes) in two models of chronic glaucoma and healthy controls. Abbreviations: MEPI: glaucoma model induced by sclerosing the episcleral veins; Ms: glaucoma model induced by injection of PLGA microspheres; IOP: intraocular pressure (data extracted from [50,62]).
Figure 3VIT/RPE signal intensity. (a) Right eye (both sexes); (b) left eye (both sexes); (c) males (right eye); (d) females (right eye). MEPI: episcleral vein sclerosis model (yellow); Ms: microsphere intraocular injection model (blue); healthy CONTROL: cohort of healthy animals without intervention (black); VIT: vitreous; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
Correlations in both chronic glaucoma models and healthy controls. Abbreviations: INJ: injections; IOP: intraocular pressure; OCT: optical coherence tomography; w: week; RE: right eyes; LE: left eyes; MEPI: model induced by sclerosing the episcleral veins; Ms: model induced by injecting microspheres into the anterior chamber; HC: healthy controls; im: inverse moderate correlation; m: moderate correlation. In bold: statistically high correlations.
| RIGHT EYE | LEFT EYE | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEPI | Ms | HC | MEPI | Ms | HC | |
|
| Inj/6 w (m) | Inj/8 w (m) | ||||
|
| 0 w/8 w (im) | 2 w/4 w (m) | 0 w/8 w (im) | |||
|
| ||||||
|
| 6 w/12 w (m) | |||||
Figure 4Significant correlations by sex in the two models of chronic glaucoma (episcleral model: (a–c); Ms model: (d–f)); and healthy controls (g–i). Abbreviations: IOP: intraocular pressure; OCT: optical coherence tomography; w: week.
Figure 5Localization of intravitreal cells (arrow) close to the internal limiting membrane (arrowhead) in hypertensive rat eyes. GCL: ganglion cell layer; IPL: internal plexiform layer. Scale bar: 12.5 µm.
Figure 6Hyalocyte-like cells in hypertensive rat eyes showed positive for Iba1 (arrows). (A,C,D,E): Examples of Iba1 positive hyalocyte-like cells. (B): Activated microglia embedded in the retina also showed, as expected, positive for Iba1. (E): The presence of Iba1 positive cells crossing the outer non-pigmented epithelium could suggest that hyalocytes migrate from the ciliary body to the vitreous. GCL: ganglion cell layer; IPL: internal plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer; arrowhead: internal limiting membrane; CB: ciliary body; ONPE: outer non-pigmented epithelium; IPE: inner pigmented epithelium; open arrow: Iba1 positive cell crossing the outer non-pigmented epithelium; white arrow: Iba1 positive hyalocyte. Scale bar: Retina: 12.19 µm; (A): 6.25 µm; (B): 7.24 µm; (C): 10 µm; (D): 8.3 µm; Ciliary body: 23.81 µm; (E): 9.92 µm.
Figure 7Changes in total immune response (a) and cellular quantification (b) in both glaucoma models and healthy controls. Abbreviations: RE: right eyes; LE: left eyes; MEPI: model induced by sclerosing the episcleral veins; Ms: model induced by injecting microspheres into the anterior chamber; n: number; *: statistical significance, p < 0.05, using ANOVA test.
Figure 8Cell subdivisions based on the mean area of vitreous opacities measured using OCT. Abbreviations: MEPI: model induced by sclerosing the episcleral veins; Ms: model induced by injecting microspheres into the anterior chamber; isolated cells: <10 microns2 (group 1); non-activated cells: 10–50 microns2 (group 2); activated cells: 50–250 microns2 (group 3); cell complexes: >250 microns2 (group 4). Cell populations maintain similar sizes over time, implying reliability of measurement. Complexes > 250 microns2 undergo the greatest variations with peaks at the onset of noxa in both eyes. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were highlighted with alphabetic markers as follows: a (group 1-group 2); b (group 1-group 3); c (group 1-group 4); d (group 2-group 3); e (group 2-group 4); f (group 3-group 4).
Figure 9Changes in the vitreous immune population (opacities) in both chronic glaucoma models and healthy controls over 6 months. Abbreviations: MEPI: model induced by sclerosing the episcleral veins; Ms: model induced by injecting microspheres into the anterior chamber; isolated cells: opacities < 10 microns2 (group 1); non-activated cells: 10–50 microns2 (group 2); activated cells: 50–250 microns2 (group 3); cell complexes: > 250 microns2 (group 4). Data represented in percentages. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were highlighted with alphabetic markers as follows: a (group 1-group 2); b (group 1-group 3); c (group 1-group 4); d (group 2-group 3); e (group 2-group 4); f (group 3-group 4).
Figure 10Mean intensity of opacities/cells based on size in both chronic glaucoma models and healthy controls. Abbreviations: MEPI: model induced by sclerosing the episcleral veins; Ms: model induced by injecting microspheres into the anterior chamber; isolated cells: opacities < 10 microns2; non-activated cells: 10–50 microns2; activated cells: 50–250 microns2; cell complexes: > 250 microns2. There were no statistically significant differences.
Figure 11Mean eccentricity of vitreous opacity detected using OCT, according to size, in both glaucoma models and healthy controls. Indirect in vivo analysis of cell soma morphology. Abbreviations: MEPI: model induced by sclerosing the episcleral veins; Ms: model induced by injecting microspheres into the anterior chamber; isolated cells: opacities < 10 microns2 (group 1); non-activated cells: 10–50 microns2 (group 2); activated cells: 50–250 microns2 (group 3); cell complexes: > 250 microns2 (group 4). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were highlighted with alphabetic markers as follows: a (group 1–group 2); b (group 1–group 3); c (group 1–group 4); d (group 2–group 3); e (group 2–group 4); f (group 3–group 4).
Figure 12Mean orientation of vitreous opacity detected using OCT, according to size, in both glaucoma models and healthy controls. In vivo analysis of the change in opacity/cell direction for motility. Abbreviations: MEPI: model induced by sclerosing the episcleral veins; Ms: model induced by injecting microspheres into the anterior chamber; isolated cells: opacities < 10 microns2 (group 1); non-activated cells: 10–50 microns2 (group 2); activated cells: 50–250 microns2 (group 3); cell complexes: > 250 microns2 (group 4). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were highlighted with alphabetic markers as follows: a (group 1–group 2); b (group 1–group 3); c (group 1–group 4); d (group 2–group 3); e (group 2–group 4); f (group 3–group 4).