Literature DB >> 14522759

Patterns of visual field defects in chronic angle-closure glaucoma with different disease severity.

Ling-Ing Lau1, Catherine Jui-ling Liu, Joe Ching-Kuang Chou, Wen-Ming Hsu, Jorn-Hon Liu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the patterns of visual field defects in patients with chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) with varying extent of optic nerve damage.
DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-six Asian patients with well-controlled CACG.
METHODS: Visual field tests were performed using program 24-2 of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, CA) with the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm standard. One hundred ten eligible visual fields were scored with the system adopted by the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study and were categorized into 4 groups accordingly: mild, moderate, severe, and end-stage. Each hemifield was divided into the nasal, paracentral, and arcuate areas, and field loss that involved respective areas was defined as nasal step, paracentral scotoma, and arcuate scotoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The distribution of field defect patterns in each group was evaluated. The mean deviation (MD) was compared among the 3 areas within one hemifield and between each pair of corresponding areas across the median raphe.
RESULTS: The nasal area was the most commonly damaged area in the mild group, being noted in 52% of eyes in the superior hemifield and 58% of eyes in the inferior hemifield. In the moderate group, field loss involving both the nasal and arcuate areas dominated the superior hemifield, whereas field loss involving all three areas dominated the inferior hemifield. The MD of the nasal area was the worst among the three areas in each hemifield of the mild and moderate groups, as well as in the inferior hemifield of the severe group (all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the MD of each area between the superior hemifield and their inferior counterparts. However, the superior hemifield as a whole showed a better MD than the inferior hemifield (P=0.034) in the mild group.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual field loss that involved the nasal area was the most common pattern in the early stage of CACG. The MD of the nasal area was worse than those of the arcuate and the paracentral areas within the same hemifield in the mild, moderate, and severe groups of CACG patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14522759     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00666-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  11 in total

1.  Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; Eleni Papageorgiou; Pamela A Sample; John P Pascual; Bettina Selig; Elke Krapp; Jens Paetzold
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Retinal nerve fiber bundle tracing and analysis in human eye by polarization sensitive OCT.

Authors:  Mitsuro Sugita; Michael Pircher; Stefan Zotter; Bernhard Baumann; Philipp Roberts; Tomoyuki Makihira; Nobuhiro Tomatsu; Makoto Sato; Clemens Vass; Christoph K Hitzenberger
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Location of Initial Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma and Their Modes of Deterioration.

Authors:  Joon Mo Kim; Haksu Kyung; Seong Hee Shim; Parham Azarbod; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Learning from data: recognizing glaucomatous defect patterns and detecting progression from visual field measurements.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Diagnostic ability of Humphrey perimetry, Octopus perimetry, and optical coherence tomography for glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Authors:  B Monsalve; A Ferreras; P Calvo; J A Urcola; M Figus; J Monsalve; P Frezzotti
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Recognizing patterns of visual field loss using unsupervised machine learning.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Michael H Goldbaum; Linda M Zangwill; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-21

7.  Retinal nerve fiber layer defect patterns in primary angle-closure and open-angle glaucoma: a comparison using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Anita Manassakorn; Soontaree Aupapong
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Intraocular asymmetry of visual field defects in primary angle-closure glaucoma, high-tension glaucoma, and normal-tension glaucoma in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Junhong Jiang; Cong Ye; Cong Zhang; Wenqing Ye; Xiaoyan Wang; Xiao Shang; Xiang Xu; Hongte Zhang; Shaodan Zhang; Jingwei Zheng; Jingjing Zuo; Jingjing Hu; Nathan Congdon; Fan Lu; Yuanbo Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Unsupervised Gaussian Mixture-Model With Expectation Maximization for Detecting Glaucomatous Progression in Standard Automated Perimetry Visual Fields.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Michael H Goldbaum; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Mouse model of ocular hypertension with retinal ganglion cell degeneration.

Authors:  Ryo Mukai; Dong Ho Park; Yoko Okunuki; Eiichi Hasegawa; Garrett Klokman; Clifford B Kim; Anitha Krishnan; Meredith Gregory-Ksander; Deeba Husain; Joan W Miller; Kip M Connor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.