| Literature DB >> 34930425 |
Dainius Uljanovas1, Greta Gölz2, Vanessa Brückner2, Audrone Grineviciene3, Egle Tamuleviciene4, Thomas Alter2, Mindaugas Malakauskas5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Members of the genus Arcobacter are considered as emerging zoonotic food and waterborne pathogens that cause gastroenteritis and bacteremia in humans. However, the potential risk that Arcobacter species pose to public health remains unassessed in various countries, including Baltic states. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and presence of putative virulence genes of Arcobacter isolates recovered from humans, food products and environmental water in Lithuania.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial susceptibility; Arcobacter; Environmental water; Food; Humans; Prevalence; Virulence genes
Year: 2021 PMID: 34930425 PMCID: PMC8686351 DOI: 10.1186/s13099-021-00472-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut Pathog ISSN: 1757-4749 Impact factor: 4.181
Prevalence of Arcobacter spp. in the examined samples
| Matrix | Sampling perioda | No. of samples | No. of positive samples (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Chicken meat | 10.2018–09.2019 | 331 | 119 (36)a | 114 (95.8) | 5 (4.2) | – |
| Raw cow milk | 01.2019–12.2019 | 104 | 26 (25)b | 26 (100) | – | – |
| RTE salad mixes | 11.2018–03.2019 and 05.2019–10.2019 | 99 | 7 (7.1)c | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | – |
| Environmental water | 12.2018–11.2019 | 128 | 36 (28.1)a,b | 30 (83.3) | 6 (16.7) | – |
| Human stool | 03.2019–02.2020 | 1200 | 20 (1.7)d | 20 (100) | – | – |
| Total | 1862 | 208 (11.2) | 192 (92.3)e | 16 (7.7)f | – | |
a−d Values in the same column denoted by different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)
e,f Values in the same row denoted by different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)
Fig. 1Aggregated MIC distributions of Arcobacter spp. isolated from food, environmental water and human stool samples. In addition to the MICs of the Arcobacter spp. strains (blue) isolated in our study, the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) (red broken lines) and MICs of C. jejuni (orange) from the EUCAST database are also shown [29]. E-test half-log values were rounded up to the next highest value of the standard doubling dilution scale. In order to prevent numerical dominance of EUCAST MIC distributions, number of isolates at each MIC value are presented as percentage of the total observations from individual dataset
MIC data on six antimicrobial agents for 192 A. butzleri and 16 A. cryaerophilus isolates
| ATMa | Species | Source | No. of isolates with MIC (µg/ml) of: | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | >32 | 64 | 128 | 256 | >256 | |||
| AM |
| Chicken meat | 2 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 27 | 26 | 15 | 6 | |||||||
|
| 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| Environmental water | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||
|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
|
| RTE salad mixes | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
|
| Raw cow milk | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||
| Human stool | 1 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| AZ |
| Chicken meat | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 30 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 4 | ||||
|
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
|
| Environmental water | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 3 | |||||||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
|
| RTE salad mixes | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| Raw cow milk | 3 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Human stool | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| GM |
| Chicken meat | 6 | 67 | 41 | |||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
|
| Environmental water | 2 | 22 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||
|
| RTE salad mixes | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| Raw cow milk | 13 | 11 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Human stool | 3 | 12 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
| TC |
| Chicken meat | 1 | 4 | 31 | 56 | 22 | |||||||||||
|
| 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| Environmental water | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | |||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
|
| RTE salad mixes | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| Raw cow milk | 7 | 17 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Human stool | 7 | 9 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
| EM |
| Chicken meat | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 43 | 30 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | ||||
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
|
| Environmental water | 4 | 6 | 11 | 8 | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
|
| RTE salad mixes | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| Raw cow milk | 1 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||
| Human stool | 4 | 11 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| CI |
| Chicken meat | 1 | 8 | 49 | 35 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |||||||
|
| 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| Environmental water | 4 | 11 | 14 | 1 | |||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| RTE salad mixes | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
|
| Raw cow milk | 1 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Human stool | 1 | 6 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
a ATM = antimicrobials: AM = ampicillin, AZ = azithromycin, GM = gentamicin, TC = tetracycline, EM = erythromycin, CI = ciprofloxacin
Distribution of putative virulence genes in 208 Arcobacter isolates from various sources
| Species | Source (n) | No. of isolates generating a virulence-associated gene amplicon (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Human stool (20) | 20 (100) | 20 (100) | 20 (100) | 20 (100) | 19 (95) | 20 (100) | 1 (5) | 12 (60) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Food (142) | 142 (100) | 140 (98.6) | 138 (97.2) | 142 (100) | 135 (95.1) | 140 (98.6) | 26 (18.3) | 42 (29.6) | 20 (14.1) | 11 (7.7) | |
| Chicken meat (114) | 114 (100) | 112 (98.2) | 112 (98.2) | 114 (100) | 109 (95.6) | 113 (99.1) | 24 (21.1) | 29 (25.4) | 20 (17.5) | 11 (9.6) | |
| Raw cow milk (26) | 26 (100) | 26 (100) | 24 (92.3) | 26 (100) | 24 (92.3) | 25 (96.2) | 0 (0) | 11 (42.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| RTE salad mixes (2) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Environmental water (30) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 12 (40) | 20 (66.7) | 16 (53.3) | 13 (43.3) | |
| Total (192) | 192 (100) | 190 (99) | 188 (97.9) | 192 (100) | 184 (95.8) | 190 (99) | 39 (20.3) | 74 (38.5) | 36 (18.8) | 24 (12.5) | |
|
| Food (10) | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | 10 (100) | 10 (100) | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | 2 (20) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Chicken meat (5) | 0 (0) | 1 (20) | 5 (100) | 5 (100) | 0 (0) | 1 (20) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| RTE salad mixes (5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 5 (100) | 5 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Environmental water (6) | 0 (0) | 1 (16.7) | 6 (100) | 6 (100) | 0 (0) | 3 (50) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Total (16) | 0 (0) | 2 (12.5) | 16 (100) | 16 (100) | 0 (0) | 4 (25) | 2 (12.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Virulence gene profiles of A. butzleri and A. cryaerophilus isolates
| Virulence patterns | No. of | No. of | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicken meat (n = 114) | Raw milk (n = 26) | Salad mixes (n = 2) | Water (n = 30) | Human stool (n = 20) | Chicken meat (n = 5) | Salad mixes (n = 5) | Water (n = 6) | |
| 2 genes | ||||||||
| 3 (60) | 4 (80) | 3 (50) | ||||||
| 3 genes | ||||||||
| 1 (20) | 2 (33.3) | |||||||
| 1 (20) | ||||||||
| 4 genes | ||||||||
| 1 (20) | ||||||||
| 1 (16.7) | ||||||||
| 5 genes | ||||||||
| 1 (0.9) | 1 (3.8) | |||||||
| 1 (0.9) | 1 (3.8) | |||||||
| 1 (0.9) | ||||||||
| 6 genes | ||||||||
| 69 (60.5) | 13 (50) | 7 (23.3) | 7 (35) | |||||
| 1 (0.9) | 1 (3.8) | 1 (5) | ||||||
| 1 (0.9) | ||||||||
| 1 (3.8) | ||||||||
| 1 (3.8) | ||||||||
| 7 genes | ||||||||
| 1 (5) | ||||||||
| 3 (2.6) | 8 (30.8) | 2 (6.7) | 11 (55) | |||||
| 10 (8.8) | 3 (10) | |||||||
| 1 (0.9) | ||||||||
| 1 (0.9) | ||||||||
| 1 (0.9) | ||||||||
| 8 genes | ||||||||
| 14 (12.3) | 2 (100) | 5 (16.7) | ||||||
| 1 (0.9) | ||||||||
| 9 genes | ||||||||
| 1 (0.9) | 6 (20) | |||||||
| 1 (0.9) | ||||||||
| 10 genes | ||||||||
| 7 (6.1) | 7 (23.3) | |||||||
List of primers used in this study
| Target gene | Primer pair | Primer sequence (5’–3’) | Amplicon size (bp) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species identification | ||||
|
| BUTZ F | CCTGGACTTGACATAGTAAGAATGA | 401 | Houf et al. [ |
| 16 S rRNA | ARCO R | CGTATTCACCGTAGCATAGC | ||
|
| SKIR F | GGCGATTTACTGGAACACA | 641 | |
| 16 S rRNA | ARCO R | CGTATTCACCGTAGCATAGC | ||
|
| CRY1 | TGCTGGAGCGGATAGAAGTA | 257 | |
| 23 S rRNA | CRY2 | AACAACCTACGTCCTTCGAC | ||
| Verification | ||||
|
| CamrpoB-L | CCAATTTATGGATCAAAC | 524 | Korczak et al. [ |
| RpoB-R | GTTGCATGTTNGNACCCAT | |||
| Detection of putative virulence genes | ||||
|
| mviN-F | TGCACTTGTTGCAAAACGGTG | 294 | Whiteduck-Leveillee et al. [ |
| mviN-R | TGCTGATGGAGCTTTTACGCAAGC | |||
|
| cadF-F | TTACTCCTACACCGTAGT | 283 | Douidah et al. [ |
| cadF-R | AAACTATGCTAACGCTGGTT | |||
|
| cj1349-F | CCAGAAATCACTGGCTTTTGAG | 659 | Whiteduck-Leveillee et al. [ |
| cj1349-R | GGGCATAAGTTAGATGAGGTTCC | |||
|
| ciaB-F | TGGGCAGATGTGGATAGAGCTTGGA | 284 | |
| ciaB-R | TAGTGCTGGTCGTCCCACATAAAG | |||
|
| pldA-F | TTGACGAGACAATAAGTGCAGC | 293 | |
| pldA-R | CGTCTTTATCTTTGCTTTCAGGGA | |||
|
| hecA-F | GTGGAAGTACAACGATAGCAGGCTC | 537 | |
| hecA-R | GTCTGTTTTAGTTGCTCTGCACTC | |||
|
| hecB-F | CTAAACTCTACAAATCGTGC | 528 | |
| hecB-R | CTTTTGAGTGTTGACCTC | |||
|
| tlyA-F | CAAAGTCGAAACAAAGCGACTG | 230 | |
| tlyA-R | TCCACCAGTGCTACTTCCTATA | |||
|
| irgA-F | TGCAGAGGATACTTGGAGCGTAACT | 437 | |
| irgA-R | GTATAACCCCATTGATGAGGAGCA | |||
|
| iroE-F | AATGGCTATGATGTTGTTTAC | 415 | Karadas et al. [ |
| iroE-R | TTGCTGCTATGAAGTTTTG | |||