| Literature DB >> 23941403 |
Louise Hesselbjerg Rasmussen1, Jette Kjeldgaard, Jens Peter Christensen, Hanne Ingmer.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Arcobacter spp. have in recent years received increasing interest as potential emerging enteropathogens and zoonotic agents. They are associated with various animals including poultry and can be isolated from meat products. The possibilities of persistence and cross-contamination in slaughterhouses during meat processing are not well established. We have evaluated the occurrence and persistence of Arcobacter spp. in a Danish slaughterhouse and determined the sensitivity of isolates to sodium hypochlorite, a commonly used biocide.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23941403 PMCID: PMC3751686 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
strains used in this study
| LMG 10828 | BCCM/LMG (Ghent, Belgium) | |
| LMG 7536 | CCUG (Göteborg, Sweden) | |
| LMG 10829 | BCCM/LMG (Ghent, Belgium) | |
| LMG 6621 | CCUG (Göteborg, Sweden) | |
| LMG 25534 | BCCM/LMG (Ghent, Belgium) | |
| LMG 21996 | BCCM/LMG (Ghent, Belgium) | |
| LMG 24486 | BCCM/LMG (Ghent, Belgium) |
Prevalence ofspp. in the processing line of a Danish broiler slaughterhouse determined by cultural enrichment and isolation or by direct PCR on enrichment cultures
| Enrichment | PCR | Enrichment | PCR | Enrichment | PCR | |
| 0/15 | 0/15 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 3/20 | 2/20 | |
| 10/20 | 13/20 | 0/20 | 2/20 | 19/20 | 17/20 | |
| 0/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | |
| 0/20 | 2/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | |
Overview of MLST results ofLMG 10828 and slaughterhouse isolates with allelic profiles according to theMLST database[37]
| 153 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 177 | 102 | 11 | 367 | |
| 5 | 12 | 122* | 15 | 36 | 86 | 2 | 368 | |
| 30 | 34 | 9 | 30 | 144 | 35 | 175* | 369 | |
| 206* | 143* | 2 | 37 | 166 | 53 | 162 | 370 | |
| 14 | 49 | 26 | 55 | 449* | 102 | 176* | 371 | |
| 23 | 44 | 24 | 14 | 450* | 101 | 20 | 372 | |
| 205* | 144* | 123* | 55 | 447* | 233* | 177* | 373 | |
| 5 | 5 | 5 | 19 | 120 | 11 | 65 | 374 | |
| 20 | 25 | 7 | 2 | 354 | 32 | 2 | 375 | |
| 175 | 25 | 41 | 19 | 88 | 101 | 14 | 376 | |
* New allele.
Occurrence and isolation site of 32isolates assigned ten different MLST sequence types (ST)
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 367 | 3 | Evisceration | 12 | Evisceration |
| 368 | 1 | Evisceration | - | - |
| 369 | 1 | Evisceration | - | - |
| 370 | - | - | 3 | Scalding tank |
| 371 | - | - | 2 | Evisceration |
| 372 | - | - | 1 | Evisceration |
| 373 | 4 | Evisceration | 1 | Evisceration |
| 374 | 1 | Evisceration | - | - |
| 375 | - | - | 1 | Evisceration |
| 376 | - | - | 2 | Evisceration |
Figure 1Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree of concatenated alleles from ST 367 to ST 376 (and including LMG 10828 ST 1) isolated at a Danish chicken slaughterhouse. Bootstrap analysis with 1000 replications was performed, based on 3,341 bp, and bootstrap values are shown at the nodes.