| Literature DB >> 34886446 |
Antonia Moreno1, Guillermo Sanz1, Begonya Garcia-Zapirain1.
Abstract
hGLUTEN is a technological solution capable of detecting gluten and spoiled food. We measured the social impact of the hGLUTEN tool using two Likert scale surveys with two groups: professionals (engineers/chefs) and end-users. These data have been assessed in accordance with the social impact indicators defined for the Key Impact Pathways introduced by the European Commission for Horizon Europe and the criteria of the Social Impact Open Repository (SIOR). A total of 85% of users, 100% of engineers and 68% of professional chefs consider it very relevant to participate and give their opinion in research projects, which shows the increasingly high level of involvement of the general population. A total of 88% of users were unaware of other applications that detect gluten and were more dependent on guidelines provided by allergy associations and expiry dates of foodstuffs. In addition, only 5% of professional chefs said they were aware of other technology capable of detecting gluten in food, which may indicate a large economic market and good commercialisation possibilities for the tool in the future. Finally, the inclusion of tools to motivate users to promote it has been identified as an area for improvement, which could mean that it should be made more visible in the media to increase its impact and influence.Entities:
Keywords: ODS; artificial intelligence; embedded system; sensor NIR; social impact
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34886446 PMCID: PMC8657479 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312722
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1hGLUTEN device, exterior and interior.
Figure 2DLP NIR Nano Scan Source: Texas Instruments.
Figure 3Diagram of system blocks.
Engineers’/ Professional chefs’ data.
| Questions | Mean | Variance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1P | The new application would help people allergic to gluten or spoiled food avoid anaphylactic incidents in spoiled. | 0.97 | 0.60 |
| Q2P | Authorities could improve their policies and programmes with the data that the app provides. | 1.11 | 0.44 |
| Q3P | This information has been shared with family, friends, etc. | 1.94 | 1.31 |
| Q4P | The use of this tool could lead to changes in work practices. | 0.33 | 0.23 |
| Q5P | It would improve the detection of allergens and enable more personalised treatment than other tools that people know or use. | 1.03 | 0.48 |
| Q6P | I know about a type of scientific tool that enables people to detect allergens (gluten) or spoiled foods. | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Q7P | The tool should be replicated for detection of other types of non-gluten allergens. | 1.25 | 0.48 |
| Q8P | We consider it necessary and important to give our opinion on research processes such as this one. | 0.83 | 0.14 |
| Q9P | Compared to other existing options, this new application could be used to customise data collection and processing. | 0.67 | 0.23 |
| Q10P | The hGLUTEN tool could be more involved in the treatment process. | 1.06 | 0.28 |
| Q11P | With this app, I could do a better job monitoring my customers’ allergy problems related to allergens and spoiled food. | 1.11 | 0.39 |
Standard users’ data.
| Questions | Mean | Variance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1U | Patients with pathologies caused by an allergy to gluten, allergic reactions to spoiled food and even healthy people should have easy access to such services. | 1.69 | 0.30 |
| Q2U | This app would be effective for treating people with allergies to gluten or spoiled food. | 3.31 | 0.86 |
| Q3U | This app would prevent possible complications in pathologies caused by allergens that we are exposed to. | 1.12 | 0.83 |
| Q4U | In research processes such as this one, I consider it important to give my opinion. | 0.85 | 0.14 |
| Q5U | Access to data processing and the usefulness of tool portability. | 3.08 | 0.87 |
| Q6U | I would have instant access to the data whenever I needed it during the processing process. | 3.08 | 0.87 |
| Q7U | The tool’s interface must be easy to use to be effective. | 1 | 0.72 |
| Q8U | I know about another tool that people use to measure allergens in food or detect spoiled food. | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Q9U | With hGLUTEN I could make as many measurements as I wanted or needed. | 3.19 | 0.56 |
| Q10U | This new app would increase the quality of life of people allergic to gluten and improve the service they receive in cafés, restaurants, schools, hospitals, etc., for example, by reducing travel time, leaving them more available time, using other alternative technologies or ways to save on other tools or treatments. | 3.54 | 0.50 |
| Q11U | Food services staff would monitor and handle risk situations more easily with this app. | 1.08 | 0.63 |
| Q12U | In order to understand how hGLUTEN works, the data provided by the engineers is important. | 3 | 0.8 |
| Q13U | I have commented and shared with others (friends, family, etc.) the knowledge and advantages that this application provides. | 1.85 | 1.42 |
| Q14U | If there was no medical or family support, the adaptation of this application would be good for the person using it in terms of complexity and knowledge of their disease. | 1.36 | 0.24 |
Indicator of change in behaviour and practices.
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 30% | 41% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
|
| 21% | 58% | 16% | 0% | 5% |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 35% | 59% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
|
| 21% | 53% | 26% | 0% | 0% |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 18% | 24% | 24% | 28% | 6% |
|
| 5% | 26% | 37% | 21% | 11% |
Figure 4Change indicator of improvement in work practices.
Figure 5Indicator of evaluation and impact on professionals.
Satisfaction indicator of follow-up and treatment.
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 18% | 82% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
| 16% | 63% | 21% | 0% | 0% |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 41% | 53% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
|
| 11% | 68% | 21% | 0% | 0% |
Indicator of social improvement, health and quality of life.
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 73% | 23% | 4% | 0% | 0% |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 58% | 19% | 19% | 4% | 0% |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 42% | 31% | 23% | 4% | 0% |
Indicators of improvements in the person’s experience.
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38% | 38% | 15% | 9% | 0% |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38% | 38% | 15% | 9% | 0% |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31% | 42% | 23% | 4% | 0% |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 39% | 42% | 19% | 0% | 0% |
Indicators of improvement in services provided by health personnel for better monitoring and treatment of the pathology.
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35% | 38% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31% | 46% | 15% | 8% | 0% |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 19% |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38% | 62% | 0% | 0% | 0% |