Literature DB >> 7995709

Research impact assessment. Principles and applications to proposed, ongoing, and completed projects.

R N Kostoff1.   

Abstract

Three generic types of RIA approaches used by the federal government were described (retrospective, peer review, and quantitative methods). Peer review is the method used most frequently. All methods examined have their unique shortcomings. A fundamental problem is that many research impact targets exist. These include impacts on the research field itself, allied research fields, technology, systems, operations, education, etc. The strength of the specific impact of the research on each of these targets and the weighting assigned to the value of the research impact on each of these targets depends on the technical, organizational, and personal perspectives of the reviewers. Much of the research evaluation community has come to believe that simultaneous use of many techniques is the preferred approach. However, there is little evidence of multiple technique use by the federal government in impact assessment, especially bibliometrics to support peer review. This area is ripe for exploitation.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7995709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  4 in total

Review 1.  Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications.

Authors:  V Demicheli; C Di Pietrantonj
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

2.  A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment.

Authors:  Pavel V Ovseiko; Trisha Greenhalgh; Paula Adam; Jonathan Grant; Saba Hinrichs-Krapels; Kathryn E Graham; Pamela A Valentine; Omar Sued; Omar F Boukhris; Nada M Al Olaqi; Idrees S Al Rahbi; Anne-Maree Dowd; Sara Bice; Tamika L Heiden; Michael D Fischer; Sue Dopson; Robyn Norton; Alexandra Pollitt; Steven Wooding; Gert V Balling; Ulla Jakobsen; Ellen Kuhlmann; Ineke Klinge; Linda H Pololi; Reshma Jagsi; Helen Lawton Smith; Henry Etzkowitz; Mathias W Nielsen; Carme Carrion; Maite Solans-Domènech; Esther Vizcaino; Lin Naing; Quentin H N Cheok; Baerbel Eckelmann; Moses C Simuyemba; Temwa Msiska; Giovanna Declich; Laurel D Edmunds; Vasiliki Kiparoglou; Alison M J Buchan; Catherine Williamson; Graham M Lord; Keith M Channon; Rebecca Surender; Alastair M Buchan
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-07-19

3.  ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment.

Authors:  Paula Adam; Pavel V Ovseiko; Jonathan Grant; Kathryn E A Graham; Omar F Boukhris; Anne-Maree Dowd; Gert V Balling; Rikke N Christensen; Alexandra Pollitt; Mark Taylor; Omar Sued; Saba Hinrichs-Krapels; Maite Solans-Domènech; Heidi Chorzempa
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-02-08

4.  hGLUTEN Tool: Measuring Its Social Impact Indicators.

Authors:  Antonia Moreno; Guillermo Sanz; Begonya Garcia-Zapirain
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.