BACKGROUND: Precautionary 'may contain' warnings are used to indicate possible allergen contamination. Neither food safety nor foods labelling legislation address this issue. The aim of this study is to understand how peanut and nut allergic adults interpret 'may contain' labelling and how they use this information when purchasing food. METHODS: Qualitative methods were used to explore both behaviour and attitudes. The behaviour and 'thinking aloud' of 32 participants were recorded during their normal food shop. A semi-structured interview also explored participants' views about 13 potentially problematic packaged foods. Transcribed data from these tasks were analysed to explore the interpretation of 'may contain' labelling and how this influenced food choice decisions. RESULTS: Peanut and nut allergic individuals adopt a complex range of responses and strategies to interpret 'may contain' labelling. Many claimed such labelling was not credible or desirable; many ignored it whilst some found it helpful and avoided products with all such labelling. Interpretation and consequent decisions were not only based on the detail of the labelling but also on external factors such as the nature of the product, the perceived trustworthiness of the producer and on the previous experience of the nut allergic individual. CONCLUSIONS: 'May contain' labelling was interpreted in the light of judgements about the product, producer and previous personal experience. It is vital that these interpretation strategies are taken into account by those responsible for labelling itself and for the provision of advice to nut allergic individuals. Suggestions to improve labelling and advice to the allergic individual are considered.
BACKGROUND: Precautionary 'may contain' warnings are used to indicate possible allergen contamination. Neither food safety nor foods labelling legislation address this issue. The aim of this study is to understand how peanut and nutallergic adults interpret 'may contain' labelling and how they use this information when purchasing food. METHODS: Qualitative methods were used to explore both behaviour and attitudes. The behaviour and 'thinking aloud' of 32 participants were recorded during their normal food shop. A semi-structured interview also explored participants' views about 13 potentially problematic packaged foods. Transcribed data from these tasks were analysed to explore the interpretation of 'may contain' labelling and how this influenced food choice decisions. RESULTS:Peanut and nutallergic individuals adopt a complex range of responses and strategies to interpret 'may contain' labelling. Many claimed such labelling was not credible or desirable; many ignored it whilst some found it helpful and avoided products with all such labelling. Interpretation and consequent decisions were not only based on the detail of the labelling but also on external factors such as the nature of the product, the perceived trustworthiness of the producer and on the previous experience of the nutallergic individual. CONCLUSIONS: 'May contain' labelling was interpreted in the light of judgements about the product, producer and previous personal experience. It is vital that these interpretation strategies are taken into account by those responsible for labelling itself and for the provision of advice to nutallergic individuals. Suggestions to improve labelling and advice to the allergic individual are considered.
Authors: J Barnett; J Leftwich; K Muncer; K Grimshaw; R Shepherd; M M Raats; M H Gowland; Jane S Lucas Journal: Allergy Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: Susan L Hefle; Terence J Furlong; Lynn Niemann; Heather Lemon-Mule; Scott Sicherer; Steve L Taylor Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2007-06-04 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Clare Macadam; Julie Barnett; Graham Roberts; Gary Stiefel; Rosemary King; Michel Erlewyn-Lajeunesse; Judith A Holloway; Jane S Lucas Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 5.871
Authors: Stella Anne Cochrane; M Hazel Gowland; David Sheffield; René Wilfrid Robert Crevel Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 5.871
Authors: Katrina J Allen; Paul J Turner; Ruby Pawankar; Stephen Taylor; Scott Sicherer; Gideon Lack; Nelson Rosario; Motohiro Ebisawa; Gary Wong; E N Clare Mills; Kirsten Beyer; Alessandro Fiocchi; Hugh A Sampson Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 4.084
Authors: Carlo A Marra; Stephanie Harvard; Maja Grubisic; Jessica Galo; Ann Clarke; Susan Elliott; Larry D Lynd Journal: Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 3.406
Authors: A E J Dubois; P J Turner; J Hourihane; B Ballmer-Weber; K Beyer; C-H Chan; M H Gowland; S O'Hagan; L Regent; B Remington; S Schnadt; T Stroheker; R W R Crevel Journal: Allergy Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 13.146