Literature DB >> 26236754

Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making.

Roger Ratcliff1, Russ Childers1.   

Abstract

Methods of fitting the diffusion model were examined with a focus on what the model can tell us about individual differences. Diffusion model parameters were obtained from the fits to data from two experiments and consistency of parameter values, individual differences, and practice effects were examined using different numbers of observations from each subject. Two issues were examined, first, what sizes of differences between groups can be obtained to distinguish between groups and second, what sizes of differences would be needed to find individual subjects that had a deficit relative to a control group. The parameter values from the experiments provided ranges that were used in a simulation study to examine recovery of individual differences. This study used several diffusion model fitting programs, fitting methods, and published packages. In a second simulation study, 64 sets of simulated data from each of 48 sets of parameter values (spanning the range of typical values obtained from fits to data) were fit with the different methods and biases and standard deviations in recovered model parameters were compared across methods. Finally, in a third simulation study, a comparison between a standard chi-square method and a hierarchical Bayesian method was performed. The results from these studies can be used as a starting point for selecting fitting methods and as a basis for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of using diffusion model analyses to examine individual differences in clinical, neuropsychological, and educational testing.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26236754      PMCID: PMC4517692          DOI: 10.1037/dec0000030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )        ISSN: 2325-9965


  63 in total

1.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-05

2.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.

Authors:  Florian Schmiedek; Klaus Oberauer; Oliver Wilhelm; Heinz-Martin Süss; Werner W Wittmann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

5.  Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Marios G Philiastides; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The EZ diffusion method: too EZ?

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

7.  Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Clarissa A Thompson; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-01-29

8.  Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders.

Authors:  Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff; Michael W Vasey; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

9.  The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions.

Authors:  Babette Rae; Andrew Heathcote; Chris Donkin; Lee Averell; Scott Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Integrating impairments in reaction time and executive function using a diffusion model framework.

Authors:  Sarah L Karalunas; Cynthia L Huang-Pollock
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-07
View more
  59 in total

1.  Modeling the interaction of numerosity and perceptual variables with the diffusion model.

Authors:  Inhan Kang; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-go Task with a Diffusion Model.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2016-08-15

3.  Challenges and promises for translating computational tools into clinical practice.

Authors:  Woo-Young Ahn; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 4.  Speeded multielement decision-making as diffusion in a hypersphere: Theory and application to double-target detection.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Elaine A Corbett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

5.  Decision making on spatially continuous scales.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Clarissa A Thompson; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-01-29

7.  The Processing-Speed Impairment in Psychosis Is More Than Just Accelerated Aging.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Emma E M Knowles; Jennifer Barrett; Olivia Leach; Sebastiano Buccheri; Tamara Beetham; John Blangero; Russell A Poldrack; David C Glahn
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  Modeling numerosity representation with an integrated diffusion model.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  A single trial analysis of EEG in recognition memory: Tracking the neural correlates of memory strength.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Per B Sederberg; Troy A Smith; Russ Childers
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.