Literature DB >> 20673776

Inhibitory tagging in visual search: only in difficult search are items tagged individually.

Johan Hulleman1.   

Abstract

Several theories and models of visual search assume that inhibitory tagging of items is used to improve the efficiency of the search process, by discouraging revisits of previously inspected and rejected items. Therefore, search should become less efficient when the search display consists of moving items. In four experiments this hypothesis was tested. In the first two experiments there was no difference between search amongst static and moving items even though motion conditions were blocked (Experiment 1), or displays contained up to 36 items (Experiment 2). However, in Experiments 3 and 4, where the items used in the search display forced the participants to keep track of individual items performance dropped when the items moved. Visual search showed a remarkable robustness against motion, which current theories and models of visual search have difficulties to describe. Taken together, the results reported here indicate that there is a difference between the processes used in easier search and those used in search where items need to be individuated. A framework encompassing these results is proposed. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20673776     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Camouflage, detection and identification of moving targets.

Authors:  Joanna R Hall; Innes C Cuthill; Roland Baddeley; Adam J Shohet; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Attentional Guidance and Match Decisions Rely on Different Template Information During Visual Search.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Timothy D Hanks; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-12-08

3.  Search through complex motion displays does not break down under spatial memory load.

Authors:  Johan Hulleman; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

4.  Medium versus difficult visual search: How a quantitative change in the functional visual field leads to a qualitative difference in performance.

Authors:  Johan Hulleman; Kristofer Lund; Paul A Skarratt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Motion disrupts dynamic visual search for an orientation change.

Authors:  Emily M Crowe; Christina J Howard; Iain D Gilchrist; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-06-26

6.  New Evidence for Strategic Differences between Static and Dynamic Search Tasks: An Individual Observer Analysis of Eye Movements.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.