Literature DB >> 34860559

Artificial Grammar Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Jasmine Urquhart Gillis1, Asiya Gul1, Annie Fox1, Aditi Parikh1, Yael Arbel1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate implicit learning in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) by employing a visual artificial grammar learning task.
METHOD: Thirteen children with DLD and 24 children with typical language development between the ages of 8 and 12 years completed a visual artificial grammar learning task. During the training phase of the task, participants were presented with strings of shapes that followed the underlying structure of a finite grammar. During the testing phase, participants were asked to judge whether new strings were grammatical or nongrammatical. Grammatical judgment of new strings served to measure generalization of the underlying grammatical structure. Endorsement based on chunk strength, or similarity to training exemplars, served to evaluate the extent to which children relied on surface features to guide their task performance.
RESULTS: As a group, children with typical development performed better on the artificial grammar learning task, compared with children with DLD, and accepted more grammatical strings regardless of their similarity to training exemplars. Task performance in both groups was not affected by surface features. Performance of children with DLD whose test accuracy exceeded the learning threshold of 0.5 was consistent with a generalization of the underlying grammatical structure that was unaffected by surface features.
CONCLUSIONS: The study found group differences in learning outcomes between children with and without DLD. Consistent with previous reports, children with typical development correctly endorsed more grammatical strings than children with DLD, suggesting a better acquisition of the grammatical structure. However, there was no evidence to suggest that children in the DLD group (learners and nonlearners) relied on surface features (i.e., familiarity to training exemplars) in their grammatical judgment. These results refute our hypothesis that children in the DLD group would show judgment based on familiarity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34860559      PMCID: PMC9150733          DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.674


  47 in total

1.  Visual feature learning in artificial grammar classification.

Authors:  Grace Y Chang; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The language-reading relationship in normal and reading-disabled children.

Authors:  L S Snyder; D M Downey
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-02

Review 3.  Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Perruchet; Sebastien Pacton
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Generalized motor abilities and timing behavior in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Howard N Zelaznik; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Developmental aphasia: rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception.

Authors:  P Tallal; M Piercy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Verb use in specific language impairment.

Authors:  G Conti-Ramsden; M Jones
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: a review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments.

Authors:  E L Hill
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Sensitivity to Morphosyntactic Information in Preschool Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder: A Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Patricia Deevy; Laurence B Leonard
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Sequence-specific procedural learning deficits in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Hsinjen Julie Hsu; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.