Literature DB >> 15099138

Visual feature learning in artificial grammar classification.

Grace Y Chang1, Barbara J Knowlton.   

Abstract

The Artificial Grammar Learning task has been used extensively to assess individuals' implicit learning capabilities. Previous work suggests that participants implicitly acquire rule-based knowledge as well as exemplar-specific knowledge in this task. This study investigated whether exemplar-specific knowledge acquired in this task is based on the visual features of the exemplars. When a change in the font and case occurred between study and test, there was no effect on sensitivity to grammatical rules in classification judgments. However, such a change did virtually eliminate sensitivity to training frequencies of letter bigrams and trigrams (chunk strength) in classification judgments. Performance of a secondary task during study eliminated this font sensitivity and generally reduced the contribution of chunk strength knowledge. The results are consistent with the idea that perceptual fluency makes a contribution to artificial grammar judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15099138     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Artificial Grammar Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Jasmine Urquhart Gillis; Asiya Gul; Annie Fox; Aditi Parikh; Yael Arbel
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 2.  Neurocognitive basis of implicit learning of sequential structure and its relation to language processing.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Impaired implicit learning in schizophrenia.

Authors:  William P Horan; Michael F Green; Barbara J Knowlton; Jonathan K Wynn; Jim Mintz; Keith H Nuechterlein
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Sleep-based memory processing facilitates grammatical generalization: Evidence from targeted memory reactivation.

Authors:  Laura J Batterink; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Julia L Evans; Jenny R Saffran; Kathryn Robe-Torres
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Manipulating attentional load in sequence learning through random number generation.

Authors:  Michał Wierzchoń; Vinciane Gaillard; Dariusz Asanowicz; Axel Cleeremans
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

7.  Lack of Cross-Modal Effects in Dual-Modality Implicit Statistical Learning.

Authors:  Xiujun Li; Xudong Zhao; Wendian Shi; Yang Lu; Christopher M Conway
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-27

8.  Cross-cultural differences in implicit learning of chunks versus symmetries.

Authors:  Xiaoli Ling; Li Zheng; Xiuyan Guo; Shouxin Li; Shiyu Song; Lining Sun; Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 9.  Does complexity matter? Meta-analysis of learner performance in artificial grammar tasks.

Authors:  Rachel Schiff; Pesia Katan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-25

10.  Cross-Domain Statistical-Sequential Dependencies Are Difficult to Learn.

Authors:  Anne M Walk; Christopher M Conway
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.