Literature DB >> 30453333

Sensitivity to Morphosyntactic Information in Preschool Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder: A Follow-Up Study.

Patricia Deevy1, Laurence B Leonard1.   

Abstract

Purpose: This study tested children's sensitivity to tense/agreement information in fronted auxiliaries during online comprehension of questions (e.g., Are the nice little dogs running?). Data from children with developmental language disorder (DLD) were compared to previously published data from typically developing (TD) children matched according to sentence comprehension test scores. Method: Fifteen 5-year-old children with DLD and fifteen 3-year-old TD children participated in a looking-while-listening task. Children viewed pairs of pictures, 1 with a single agent and 1 with multiple agents, accompanied by a sentence with a fronted auxiliary (is + single agent or are + two agents) or a control sentence. Proportion looking to the target was measured.
Results: Children with DLD did not show anticipatory looking based on the number information contained in the auxiliary (is or are) as the younger TD children had. Both groups showed significant increases in looking to the target upon hearing the subject noun (e.g., dogs). Conclusions: Despite the groups' similar sentence comprehension abilities and ability to accurately respond to the information provided by the subject noun, children with DLD did not show sensitivity to number information on the fronted auxiliary. This insensitivity is considered in light of these children's weaker command of tense/agreement forms in their speech. Specifically, we consider the possibility that failure to grasp the relation between the subject-verb sequence (e.g., dogs running) and preceding information (e.g., are) in questions in the input contributes to the protracted inconsistency in producing auxiliary forms in obligatory contexts by children with DLD. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7283459.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30453333      PMCID: PMC6440306          DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  16 in total

1.  Modeling the Developmental Patterning of Finiteness Marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish Using MOSAIC.

Authors:  Daniel Freudenthal; Julian M Pine; Javier Aguado-Orea; Fernand Gobet
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-03-04

2.  Are some parents' interaction styles associated with richer grammatical input?

Authors:  Colleen E Fitzgerald; Pamela A Hadley; Matthew Rispoli
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  A Clinical Evaluation of the Competing Sources of Input Hypothesis.

Authors:  Marc E Fey; Laurence B Leonard; Shelley L Bredin-Oja; Patricia Deevy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  The use of grammatical morphemes reflecting aspect and modality by children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy; Carol A Miller; Monique Charest; Robert Kurtz; Leila Rauf
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2003-11

5.  The comprehension of wh-questions in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Patricia Deevy; Laurence B Leonard
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Speed of processing, working memory, and language impairment in children.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Susan Ellis Weismer; Carol A Miller; David J Francis; J Bruce Tomblin; Robert V Kail
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The diagnostic accuracy and construct validity of the structured photographic expressive language test--preschool: second edition.

Authors:  Kathryn J Greenslade; Elena Plante; Rebecca Vance
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood.

Authors:  Virginia A Marchman; Anne Fernald
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-05

9.  Input Distribution Influences Degree of Auxiliary Use by Children with Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy
Journal:  Cogn Linguist       Date:  2011-04

10.  Input sources of third person singular -s inconsistency in children with and without specific language impairment.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Marc E Fey; Patricia Deevy; Shelley L Bredin-Oja
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2014-07-30
View more
  5 in total

1.  Using Computerized Language Analysis to Evaluate Grammatical Skills.

Authors:  Lizbeth H Finestack; Bobbi Rohwer; Lisa Hilliard; Leonard Abbeduto
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Artificial Grammar Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Jasmine Urquhart Gillis; Asiya Gul; Annie Fox; Aditi Parikh; Yael Arbel
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Comprehension of Mandarin Aspect Markers by Preschool Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Lijun Chen; Stephanie Durrleman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-28

4.  The role of Function Words to build syntactic knowledge in French-speaking children.

Authors:  Marie-Thérèse Le Normand; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Vowel Accuracy and Segmental Variability Differentiate Children With Developmental Language Disorder in Nonword Repetition.

Authors:  Janet Vuolo; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.297

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.