Literature DB >> 34798620

An adaptive spot placement method on Cartesian grid for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Bowen Lin1, Shujun Fu1, Yuting Lin2, Ronny L Rotondo2, Weizhang Huang3, Harold H Li2, Ronald C Chen2, Hao Gao2.   

Abstract

Pencil beam scanning proton radiotherapy (RT) offers flexible proton spot placement near treatment targets for delivering tumoricidal radiation dose to tumor targets while sparing organs-at-risk. Currently the spot placement is mostly based on a non-adaptive sampling (NS) strategy on a Cartesian grid. However, the spot density or spacing during NS is a constant for the Cartesian grid that is independent of the geometry of tumor targets, and thus can be suboptimal in terms of plan quality (e.g. target dose conformality) and delivery efficiency (e.g. number of spots). This work develops an adaptive sampling (AS) spot placement method on the Cartesian grid that fully accounts for the geometry of tumor targets. Compared with NS, AS places (1) a relatively fine grid of spots at the boundary of tumor targets to account for the geometry of tumor targets and treatment uncertainties (setup and range uncertainty) for improving dose conformality, and (2) a relatively coarse grid of spots in the interior of tumor targets to reduce the number of spots for improving delivery efficiency and robustness to the minimum-minitor-unit (MMU) constraint. The results demonstrate that (1) AS achieved comparable plan quality with NS for regular MMU and substantially improved plan quality from NS for large MMU, using merely about 10% of spots from NS, where AS was derived from the same Cartesian grid as NS; (2) on the other hand, with similar number of spots, AS had better plan quality than NS consistently for regular and large MMU.
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inverse optimization; proton therapy; treatment planning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34798620      PMCID: PMC9311299          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac3b65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   4.174


  19 in total

1.  Hybrid proton-photon inverse optimization with uniformity-regularized proton and photon target dose.

Authors:  Hao Gao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Technical Note: Plan-delivery-time constrained inverse optimization method with minimum-MU-per-energy-layer (MMPEL) for efficient pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Hao Gao; Benjamin Clasie; Mark McDonald; Katja M Langen; Tian Liu; Yuting Lin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Effects of minimum monitor unit threshold on spot scanning proton plan quality.

Authors:  Michelle Howard; Chris Beltran; Charles S Mayo; Michael G Herman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yu An; Martin Bues; Steven E Schild; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality.

Authors:  X R Zhu; N Sahoo; X Zhang; D Robertson; H Li; S Choi; A K Lee; M T Gillin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Robust fluence map optimization via alternating direction method of multipliers with empirical parameter optimization.

Authors:  Hao Gao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A Greedy reassignment algorithm for the PBS minimum monitor unit constraint.

Authors:  Yuting Lin; Hanne Kooy; David Craft; Nicolas Depauw; Jacob Flanz; Benjamin Clasie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  An optimized approach for robust spot placement in proton pencil beam scanning.

Authors:  Mahboob Ur Rehman; Kevin Erhart; Jerrold Kielbasa; Sanford L Meeks; Zhiqiu Li; Twyla Willoughby; Naren Ramakrishna; Ken Stephenson; Talat S Rahman; Patrick Kelly; Omar Zeidan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Minimum-MU and sparse-energy-layer (MMSEL) constrained inverse optimization method for efficiently deliverable PBS plans.

Authors:  Yuting Lin; Benjamin Clasie; Tian Liu; Mark McDonald; Katja M Langen; Hao Gao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Maryam Moteabbed; Torunn I Yock; Nicolas Depauw; Thomas M Madden; Hanne M Kooy; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficient contour-based annotation by iterative deep learning for organ segmentation from volumetric medical images.

Authors:  Mingrui Zhuang; Zhonghua Chen; Hongkai Wang; Hong Tang; Jiang He; Bobo Qin; Yuxin Yang; Xiaoxian Jin; Mengzhu Yu; Baitao Jin; Taijing Li; Lauri Kettunen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 2.  The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Li Lin; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 66.675

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.