Literature DB >> 29148570

Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint.

Jie Shan1, Yu An2, Martin Bues2, Steven E Schild2, Wei Liu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Currently, in clinical practice of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), the influence of the minimum monitor unit (MU) constraint is taken into account through postprocessing after the optimization is completed. This may degrade the plan quality and plan robustness. This study aims to mitigate the impact of the minimum MU constraint directly during the plan robust optimization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cao et al. have demonstrated a two-stage method to account for the minimum MU constraint using linear programming without the impact of uncertainties considered. In this study, we took the minimum MU constraint into consideration using quadratic optimization and simultaneously had the impact of uncertainties considered using robust optimization. We evaluated our method using seven cancer patients with different machine settings. RESULT: The new method achieved better plan quality than the conventional method. The D95% of the clinical target volume (CTV) normalized to the prescription dose was (mean [min-max]): (99.4% [99.2%-99.6%]) vs. (99.2% [98.6%-99.6%]). Plan robustness derived from these two methods was comparable. For all seven patients, the CTV dose-volume histogram band gap (narrower band gap means more robust plans) at D95% normalized to the prescription dose was (mean [min-max]): (1.5% [0.5%-4.3%]) vs. (1.2% [0.6%-3.8%]).
CONCLUSION: Our new method of incorporating the minimum MU constraint directly into the plan robust optimization can produce machine-deliverable plans with better tumor coverage while maintaining high-plan robustness.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  L-BFGS-B; deliverable robustness; intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT); minimum MU constraint; quadratic optimization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29148570      PMCID: PMC5774242          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  48 in total

1.  Algorithms and functionality of an intensity modulated radiotherapy optimization system.

Authors:  Q Wu; R Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A new smoothing procedure to reduce delivery segments for static MLC-based IMRT planning.

Authors:  Xuepeng Sun; Ping Xia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Yupeng Li; Xiaoqiang Li; Wenhua Cao; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Visualization of a variety of possible dosimetric outcomes in radiation therapy using dose-volume histogram bands.

Authors:  Alexei Trofimov; Jan Unkelbach; Thomas F DeLaney; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-09-09

5.  Reducing the sensitivity of IMPT treatment plans to setup errors and range uncertainties via probabilistic treatment planning.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Thomas Bortfeld; Benjamin C Martin; Martin Soukup
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Motion mitigation in scanned ion beam therapy through 4D-optimization.

Authors:  Christian Graeff
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  A Greedy reassignment algorithm for the PBS minimum monitor unit constraint.

Authors:  Yuting Lin; Hanne Kooy; David Craft; Nicolas Depauw; Jacob Flanz; Benjamin Clasie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Yu-Hui Chang; Zhifei Wen; Jiajian Shen; Joshua B Stoker; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael G Herman; Carlos Vargas; Sameer Keole; William Wong; Martin Bues
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Incorporating deliverable monitor unit constraints into spot intensity optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Gino Lim; Xiaoqiang Li; Yupeng Li; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Mixed integer programming with dose-volume constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Pengfei Zhang; Neng Fan; Jie Shan; Steven E Schild; Martin Bues; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  6 in total

1.  An adaptive spot placement method on Cartesian grid for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Bowen Lin; Shujun Fu; Yuting Lin; Ronny L Rotondo; Weizhang Huang; Harold H Li; Ronald C Chen; Hao Gao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.174

2.  Minimum-monitor-unit optimization via a stochastic coordinate descent method.

Authors:  Jian-Feng Cai; Ronald C Chen; Junyi Fan; Hao Gao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yunze Yang; Steven E Schild; Thomas B Daniels; William W Wong; Mirek Fatyga; Martin Bues; Terence T Sio; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  miRNA-338-3p inhibits the migration, invasion and proliferation of human lung adenocarcinoma cells by targeting MAP3K2.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Dongchang Wang; Yuanyuan Wang; Gang Chen
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.955

5.  AAPM Task Group Report 290: Respiratory motion management for particle therapy.

Authors:  Heng Li; Lei Dong; Christoph Bert; Joe Chang; Stella Flampouri; Kyung-Wook Jee; Liyong Lin; Michael Moyers; Shinichiro Mori; Joerg Rottmann; Erik Tryggestad; Sastry Vedam
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.506

6.  Beam angle comparison for distal esophageal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Hongying Feng; Terence T Sio; William G Rule; Ronik S Bhangoo; Pedro Lara; Christopher L Patrick; Shawn Korte; Mirek Fatyga; William W Wong; Steven E Schild; Jonathan B Ashman; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.