Literature DB >> 36048319

Efficient contour-based annotation by iterative deep learning for organ segmentation from volumetric medical images.

Mingrui Zhuang1, Zhonghua Chen1,2, Hongkai Wang3,4, Hong Tang1, Jiang He1, Bobo Qin1, Yuxin Yang1, Xiaoxian Jin1, Mengzhu Yu1, Baitao Jin1, Taijing Li1, Lauri Kettunen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Training deep neural networks usually require a large number of human-annotated data. For organ segmentation from volumetric medical images, human annotation is tedious and inefficient. To save human labour and to accelerate the training process, the strategy of annotation by iterative deep learning recently becomes popular in the research community. However, due to the lack of domain knowledge or efficient human-interaction tools, the current AID methods still suffer from long training time and high annotation burden.
METHODS: We develop a contour-based annotation by iterative deep learning (AID) algorithm which uses boundary representation instead of voxel labels to incorporate high-level organ shape knowledge. We propose a contour segmentation network with a multi-scale feature extraction backbone to improve the boundary detection accuracy. We also developed a contour-based human-intervention method to facilitate easy adjustments of organ boundaries. By combining the contour-based segmentation network and the contour-adjustment intervention method, our algorithm achieves fast few-shot learning and efficient human proofreading.
RESULTS: For validation, two human operators independently annotated four abdominal organs in computed tomography (CT) images using our method and two compared methods, i.e. a traditional contour-interpolation method and a state-of-the-art (SOTA) convolutional network (CNN) method based on voxel label representation. Compared to these methods, our approach considerably saved annotation time and reduced inter-rater variabilities. Our contour detection network also outperforms the SOTA nnU-Net in producing anatomically plausible organ shape with only a small training set.
CONCLUSION: Taking advantage of the boundary shape prior and the contour representation, our method is more efficient, more accurate and less prone to inter-operator variability than the SOTA AID methods for organ segmentation from volumetric medical images. The good shape learning ability and flexible boundary adjustment function make it suitable for fast annotation of organ structures with regular shape.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Interactive segmentation; Medical image annotation; Organ segmentation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36048319     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-022-02730-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   3.421


  14 in total

1.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  The medical imaging interaction toolkit.

Authors:  Ivo Wolf; Marcus Vetter; Ingmar Wegner; Thomas Böttger; Marco Nolden; Max Schöbinger; Mark Hastenteufel; Tobias Kunert; Hans-Peter Meinzer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  User-Guided Segmentation of Multi-modality Medical Imaging Datasets with ITK-SNAP.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Artem Pashchinskiy; Ipek Oguz; Suyash Mohan; J Eric Schmitt; Joel M Stein; Dženan Zukić; Jared Vicory; Matthew McCormick; Natalie Yushkevich; Nadav Schwartz; Yang Gao; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2019-01

4.  Design and Evaluation of Interactive Proofreading Tools for Connectomics.

Authors:  Daniel Haehn; Seymour Knowles-Barley; Mike Roberts; Johanna Beyer; Narayanan Kasthuri; Jeff W Lichtman; Hanspeter Pfister
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.579

5.  An adaptive spot placement method on Cartesian grid for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Bowen Lin; Shujun Fu; Yuting Lin; Ronny L Rotondo; Weizhang Huang; Harold H Li; Ronald C Chen; Hao Gao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.174

6.  A 3D interactive multi-object segmentation tool using local robust statistics driven active contours.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Ron Kikinis; Sylvain Bouix; Martha Shenton; Allen Tannenbaum
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  DeepIGeoS: A Deep Interactive Geodesic Framework for Medical Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Guotai Wang; Maria A Zuluaga; Wenqi Li; Rosalind Pratt; Premal A Patel; Michael Aertsen; Tom Doel; Anna L David; Jan Deprest; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.226

8.  SuRVoS: Super-Region Volume Segmentation workbench.

Authors:  Imanol Luengo; Michele C Darrow; Matthew C Spink; Ying Sun; Wei Dai; Cynthia Y He; Wah Chiu; Tony Pridmore; Alun W Ashton; Elizabeth M H Duke; Mark Basham; Andrew P French
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.867

9.  RIL-Contour: a Medical Imaging Dataset Annotation Tool for and with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Kenneth A Philbrick; Alexander D Weston; Zeynettin Akkus; Timothy L Kline; Panagiotis Korfiatis; Tomas Sakinis; Petro Kostandy; Arunnit Boonrod; Atefeh Zeinoddini; Naoki Takahashi; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  FISICO: Fast Image SegmentatIon COrrection.

Authors:  Waldo Valenzuela; Stephen J Ferguson; Dominika Ignasiak; Gaëlle Diserens; Levin Häni; Roland Wiest; Peter Vermathen; Chris Boesch; Mauricio Reyes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.