Literature DB >> 27245098

A Greedy reassignment algorithm for the PBS minimum monitor unit constraint.

Yuting Lin1, Hanne Kooy, David Craft, Nicolas Depauw, Jacob Flanz, Benjamin Clasie.   

Abstract

Proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) treatment plans are made of numerous unique spots of different weights. These weights are optimized by the treatment planning systems, and sometimes fall below the deliverable threshold set by the treatment delivery system. The purpose of this work is to investigate a Greedy reassignment algorithm to mitigate the effects of these low weight pencil beams. The algorithm is applied during post-processing to the optimized plan to generate deliverable plans for the treatment delivery system. The Greedy reassignment method developed in this work deletes the smallest weight spot in the entire field and reassigns its weight to its nearest neighbor(s) and repeats until all spots are above the minimum monitor unit (MU) constraint. Its performance was evaluated using plans collected from 190 patients (496 fields) treated at our facility. The Greedy reassignment method was compared against two other post-processing methods. The evaluation criteria was the γ-index pass rate that compares the pre-processed and post-processed dose distributions. A planning metric was developed to predict the impact of post-processing on treatment plans for various treatment planning, machine, and dose tolerance parameters. For fields with a pass rate of 90  ±  1% the planning metric has a standard deviation equal to 18% of the centroid value showing that the planning metric and γ-index pass rate are correlated for the Greedy reassignment algorithm. Using a 3rd order polynomial fit to the data, the Greedy reassignment method has 1.8 times better planning metric at 90% pass rate compared to other post-processing methods. As the planning metric and pass rate are correlated, the planning metric could provide an aid for implementing parameters during treatment planning, or even during facility design, in order to yield acceptable pass rates. More facilities are starting to implement PBS and some have spot sizes (one standard deviation) smaller than 5 mm, hence would require small spot spacing. While this is not the only parameter that affects the optimized plan, the perturbation due to the minimum MU constraint increases with decreasing spot spacing. This work could help to design the minimum MU threshold with the goal to keep the γ-index pass rate above an acceptable value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27245098     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/12/4665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yu An; Martin Bues; Steven E Schild; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Energy layer optimization via energy matrix regularization for proton spot-scanning arc therapy.

Authors:  Gezhi Zhang; Haozheng Shen; Yuting Lin; Ronald C Chen; Yong Long; Hao Gao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.506

3.  An adaptive spot placement method on Cartesian grid for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Bowen Lin; Shujun Fu; Yuting Lin; Ronny L Rotondo; Weizhang Huang; Harold H Li; Ronald C Chen; Hao Gao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.174

4.  Minimum-monitor-unit optimization via a stochastic coordinate descent method.

Authors:  Jian-Feng Cai; Ronald C Chen; Junyi Fan; Hao Gao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.174

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.