Literature DB >> 34787148

Rapid prototyping of cell culture microdevices using parylene-coated 3D prints.

Brian J O'Grady1, Michael D Geuy2, Hyosung Kim1, Kylie M Balotin3, Everett R Allchin1, David C Florian3, Neelansh N Bute4, Taylor E Scott1, Gregory B Lowen1, Colin M Fricker4, Matthew L Fitzgerald5, Scott A Guelcher1, John P Wikswo2,3,6,7, Leon M Bellan5,8, Ethan S Lippmann1,3,4,8.   

Abstract

Fabrication of microfluidic devices by photolithography generally requires specialized training and access to a cleanroom. As an alternative, 3D printing enables cost-effective fabrication of microdevices with complex features that would be suitable for many biomedical applications. However, commonly used resins are cytotoxic and unsuitable for devices involving cells. Furthermore, 3D prints are generally refractory to elastomer polymerization such that they cannot be used as master molds for fabricating devices from polymers (e.g. polydimethylsiloxane, or PDMS). Different post-print treatment strategies, such as heat curing, ultraviolet light exposure, and coating with silanes, have been explored to overcome these obstacles, but none have proven universally effective. Here, we show that deposition of a thin layer of parylene, a polymer commonly used for medical device applications, renders 3D prints biocompatible and allows them to be used as master molds for elastomeric device fabrication. When placed in culture dishes containing human neurons, regardless of resin type, uncoated 3D prints leached toxic material to yield complete cell death within 48 hours, whereas cells exhibited uniform viability and healthy morphology out to 21 days if the prints were coated with parylene. Diverse PDMS devices of different shapes and sizes were easily cast from parylene-coated 3D printed molds without any visible defects. As a proof-of-concept, we rapid prototyped and tested different types of PDMS devices, including triple chamber perfusion chips, droplet generators, and microwells. Overall, we suggest that the simplicity and reproducibility of this technique will make it attractive for fabricating traditional microdevices and rapid prototyping new designs. In particular, by minimizing user intervention on the fabrication and post-print treatment steps, our strategy could help make microfluidics more accessible to the biomedical research community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34787148      PMCID: PMC8717820          DOI: 10.1039/d1lc00744k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  18 in total

1.  Open-source, community-driven microfluidics with Metafluidics.

Authors:  David S Kong; Todd A Thorsen; Jonathan Babb; Scott T Wick; Jeremy J Gam; Ron Weiss; Peter A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Droplet microfluidics for the construction of compartmentalised model membranes.

Authors:  T Trantidou; M S Friddin; A Salehi-Reyhani; O Ces; Y Elani
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 3.  The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research.

Authors:  Eric K Sackmann; Anna L Fulton; David J Beebe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers.

Authors:  Sidra Waheed; Joan M Cabot; Niall P Macdonald; Trevor Lewis; Rosanne M Guijt; Brett Paull; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Development of an N-Cadherin Biofunctionalized Hydrogel to Support the Formation of Synaptically Connected Neural Networks.

Authors:  Brian J O'Grady; Kylie M Balotin; Allison M Bosworth; P Mason McClatchey; Robert M Weinstein; Mukesh Gupta; Kara S Poole; Leon M Bellan; Ethan S Lippmann
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-09-04

6.  Human 3D vascularized organotypic microfluidic assays to study breast cancer cell extravasation.

Authors:  Jessie S Jeon; Simone Bersini; Mara Gilardi; Gabriele Dubini; Joseph L Charest; Matteo Moretti; Roger D Kamm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The relationship between the Young's modulus and dry etching rate of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS).

Authors:  Matthew L Fitzgerald; Sara Tsai; Leon M Bellan; Rebecca Sappington; Yaqiong Xu; Deyu Li
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 2.838

8.  PDMS Curing Inhibition on 3D-Printed Molds: Why? Also, How to Avoid It?

Authors:  Bastien Venzac; Shanliang Deng; Ziad Mahmoud; Aufried Lenferink; Aurélie Costa; Fabrice Bray; Cees Otto; Christian Rolando; Séverine Le Gac
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Assembly of functionally integrated human forebrain spheroids.

Authors:  Fikri Birey; Jimena Andersen; Christopher D Makinson; Saiful Islam; Wu Wei; Nina Huber; H Christina Fan; Kimberly R Cordes Metzler; Georgia Panagiotakos; Nicholas Thom; Nancy A O'Rourke; Lars M Steinmetz; Jonathan A Bernstein; Joachim Hallmayer; John R Huguenard; Sergiu P Paşca
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Spin∞: an updated miniaturized spinning bioreactor design for the generation of human cerebral organoids from pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Alejandra I Romero-Morales; Brian J O'Grady; Kylie M Balotin; Leon M Bellan; Ethan S Lippmann; Vivian Gama
Journal:  HardwareX       Date:  2019-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.