Fikri Birey1, Jimena Andersen1, Christopher D Makinson2, Saiful Islam3, Wu Wei3,4, Nina Huber1, H Christina Fan5, Kimberly R Cordes Metzler5, Georgia Panagiotakos6, Nicholas Thom1, Nancy A O'Rourke1, Lars M Steinmetz3,4,7, Jonathan A Bernstein8, Joachim Hallmayer1, John R Huguenard2, Sergiu P Paşca1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Sleep Sciences and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 2. Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 3. Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 4. Stanford Genome Technology Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94304, USA. 5. BD Genomics, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA. 6. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA. 7. European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany. 8. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Abstract
The development of the nervous system involves a coordinated succession of events including the migration of GABAergic (γ-aminobutyric-acid-releasing) neurons from ventral to dorsal forebrain and their integration into cortical circuits. However, these interregional interactions have not yet been modelled with human cells. Here we generate three-dimensional spheroids from human pluripotent stem cells that resemble either the dorsal or ventral forebrain and contain cortical glutamatergic or GABAergic neurons. These subdomain-specific forebrain spheroids can be assembled in vitro to recapitulate the saltatory migration of interneurons observed in the fetal forebrain. Using this system, we find that in Timothy syndrome-a neurodevelopmental disorder that is caused by mutations in the CaV1.2 calcium channel-interneurons display abnormal migratory saltations. We also show that after migration, interneurons functionally integrate with glutamatergic neurons to form a microphysiological system. We anticipate that this approach will be useful for studying neural development and disease, and for deriving spheroids that resemble other brain regions to assemble circuits in vitro.
The development of the nervous system involves a coordinated succession of events including the migration of GABAergic (γ-aminobutyric-acid-releasing) neurons from ventral to dorsal forebrain and their integration into cortical circuits. However, these interregional interactions have not yet been modelled with human cells. Here we generate three-dimensional spheroids from human pluripotent stem cells that resemble either the dorsal or ventral forebrain and contain cortical glutamatergic or GABAergic neurons. These subdomain-specific forebrain spheroids can be assembled in vitro to recapitulate the saltatory migration of interneurons observed in the fetal forebrain. Using this system, we find that in Timothy syndrome-a neurodevelopmental disorder that is caused by mutations in the CaV1.2calcium channel-interneurons display abnormal migratory saltations. We also show that after migration, interneurons functionally integrate with glutamatergic neurons to form a microphysiological system. We anticipate that this approach will be useful for studying neural development and disease, and for deriving spheroids that resemble other brain regions to assemble circuits in vitro.
The formation of the human cerebral cortex involves the assembly of circuits
composed of glutamatergic neurons, which are generated in the dorsal forebrain
(pallium), and GABAergic interneurons, which are born in the ventral forebrain
(subpallium)[1-3]. After specification, interneurons
migrate long distances over several months during human fetal development and
subsequently undergo activity-dependent maturation and integration into cortical
circuits[1,4]. Genetic or environmental perturbations of
this process can lead to an imbalance of cortical excitation and inhibition and are
thought to contribute to neuropsychiatric disorders, including epilepsy and autism
spectrum disorders (ASD)[5,6]. These key developmental processes, which
occur mostly in mid-to-late gestation, have been largely inaccessible for functional
studies in humans[7,8]. Moreover, the directed differentiation, and
particularly the functional maturation of cortical interneurons from human
pluripotent stem cells (induced pluripotent stem cells, hiPSC, or embryonic stem
cells, hESCs), has been challenging[9,10]. To date, no
reliable, personalized models exist to study the migration of human interneurons and
their functional integration into cortical ensembles.Here, we leverage a 3D differentiation approach using hPSCs to specify neural
spheroids resembling the pallium (human cortical spheroids, hCS) or the subpallium
(human subpallium spheroids, hSS), and we subsequently assemble them in
vitro to model for the first time the saltatory migration of human
interneurons towards the cerebral cortex and their functional integration into
microcircuits.
GENERATION OF SUBDOMAIN-SPECIFIC FOREBRAIN SPHEROIDS
We have previously described the generation of floating, 3D neural cultures
from hPSCs resembling the pallium (hCS) that contain deep and superficial layer
cortical glutamatergic neurons, as well as astrocytes[11]. To specify spheroids resembling the ventral
forebrain or the subpallium (hSS), we exposed early spheroids that were patterned by
double SMAD inhibition to small molecules modulating the WNT and SHH pathways in the
presence of the growth factors FGF2 and EGF (Fig.
1a; Supplementary Table
1). At day 25 of hSS in vitro differentiation, we
observed a strong induction of the transcription factor NKX2-1 in
hSS accompanied by high levels of FOXG1 expression and
down-regulation of the pallial marker EMX1, suggestive of a
subpallial fate (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Table 2). We
next examined the hSS cytoarchitecture in cryosections and noticed that NKX2-1 was
expressed in ventricular zone (VZ)-like structures at day 25 (Fig. 1c) but was distributed more broadly at later stages
(Fig. 1d). At day 60, we observed strong
expression of GABA and the GABA-synthesizing enzyme GAD67 in neurons (Fig. 1e, f). Of the known markers that identify
GABAergic subtypes, somatostatin (SST), calretinin (CR) and calbindin (CB) were the
most strongly expressed; at later stages (> 200 days), and consistent its
expression later in development in vivo[12], parvalbumin (PV) was also present (Fig. 1g, h; Extended Data Fig. 1).
Figure 1
Characterization of hSS derived from hPSC
(a) Generation of hCS and hSS. (b) Fold changes
(relative to gene expression in hPSC; normalized to GAPDH) of
NKX2–1 (n= 6 hPSC lines; Mann-Whitney test,
P= 0.002), FOXG1 (n= 5 hPSC lines; t-test,
P= 0.35) and EMX1 (n= 4 hPSC lines;
Mann-Whitney test, P= 0.02) in hCS and hSS at day 25. (c,
d) Immunostaining of hSS for NKX2–1, (e,
f) GABA, GAD67 and MAP2, and (g, h)
SST, CR, CB, PV. (i, j) Single cell profiling of hCS and hSS.
(k) AT volume in hSS for MAP2, GFAP, SYN1 and VGAT.
(l) Patch clamping in sliced hSS and a representative trace of
whole-cell current-clamp recording. (m, n) Spontaneous IPSCs before
(black) and during (blue) application of gabazine in an hSS slice (paired
t-test, **P= 0.004).
Extended Data Figure 1
Immunostaining of hSS in cryosections showing PV neurons
Two anti–PV antibodies have been used to validate
specificity; co-localization with the neuronal marker DCX (day 209).
To comprehensively characterize hSS and hCS, we performed single cell
transcriptional profiling at day 105 of differentiation using stochastic
barcoding[13] (n=
11,838 cells from hCS and hSS; BD™ Resolve system; Fig. 1i). Clustering of cells isolated from either hCS or
hSS using the t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t–SNE)[14] revealed a separation of the two
conditions. Neurons expressing STMN2 were localized on the upper
left of the t–SNE space, whereas progenitors and mitotically active cells
were distributed in the lower right (Extended Data
Fig. 2a–c). Further examination identified several subdomains in
hCS (Fig. 1j, Extended Data Fig. 2d), including a group of glutamatergic neurons
(VGLUT1) expressing the cortical layer
markers TBR1, FEZF2, CTIP2; two
groups of intermediate progenitors expressing TBR2,
INSM1, HES6; and a group of dorsal progenitors
expressing LHX2, PAX6 and GLAST1
that also encompass HOPX outer radial glia-like
cells. In contrast, hSS included a cluster of ventral neural progenitors, a group of
GABAergic cells expressing DLX1, GAD1, SLC32A1,
SCG2, SST, and a small group of
oligodendrocyte progenitors (OLIG2, SOX10) (Supplementary Table 3; Extended Data Fig. 2e–m). Astroglia from
both hCS and hSS clustered together and close to a small group of cells that
resemble the choroid plexus (TTR,
SLC13A4). No cells with mesodermal or
endodermal identity were found.
Extended Data Figure 2
Single cell gene expression of hCS and hSS at day 105 of differentiation
(n= 11,838 cells; BD Resolve system)
(a) Distribution of expression of the neuronal marker
STMN2, (b) the progenitor marker VIM
and of (c) a set of genes associated with the M cell cycle phase
(AURKB, TPX2, UBE2C,
HMMR, TOP2A, CCNB1,
NUSAP1, NUF2, CDC6,
HIST1H4C, BIRC5,
CKS2). (d) Boxplots for genes enriched in each t-SNE
cluster shown in Fig. 1j.
(e–l) Top 25 genes in each of the 8 clusters shown in Fig. 1j (proportion of molecules per
cells). (m) Scatter plot showing the number of genes detected versus the
number of useful reads.
We next explored the functional properties of hSS. We found that 7 days of
exposure to the neurosteroid and GABAA receptor agonist allopregnanolone
(AlloP) combined with a 3-day exposure to retinoic acid (RA), significantly
increased the frequency of spontaneous calcium spikes (Extended Data Fig. 3a–c). Notably, exposure to AlloP with or
without RA did not alter subpallial fate, neurotransmitter identity or the GABAergic
subtypes in hSS (Extended Data Fig.
3d–l). As a result, these two conditions were used for subsequent
experiments. Considering the presence of spontaneous calcium activity and astrocytes
(Fig. 1j), we investigated synaptogenesis
in hSS using array tomography (AT). We found expression of the presynaptic protein
synapsin-1 (SYN1) and the vesicular GABA transporter VGAT (Fig. 1k). Lastly, we used whole-cell patch clamping to
record from neurons in sections of hSS and found that ~75% of
neurons generated action potentials in response to depolarization (Fig. 1l). At the same time, ~60% of
neurons exhibit spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) that reverse in
direction around the chloride reversal potential and are abolished by the
GABAA receptor antagonist gabazine (10 μM) (Fig. 1m, n; in contrast to synaptic currents in hCS, as
shown in Extended Data Fig. 4).
Extended Data Figure 3
Characterization of hSS differentiation conditions
(a) Schematic illustrating the differentiation conditions for
deriving hCS or hSS: IS, ISA and and ISRA. (b) Representative traces of
intracellular calcium measurements (Fluo-4) demonstrating spontaneous
activity in hSS at ~day 50 of differentiation. (c) Average calcium
spike frequency in 3 distinct hSS differentiation conditions: IS (n=
114 cells), ISA (n= 327 cells), ISRA (n= 136 cells); cells
derived from 3 hiPSC lines; one-way ANOVA, F(3, 719)= 5.86,
***P< 0.001. (d) Gene expression (qPCR,
normalized to GAPDH) showing down-regulation of
OCT4 and the lack of mesoderm (BRACH)
and endoderm (SOX17) markers following differentiation of
hiPSC into hCS and hSS conditions. (e) Gene expression (qPCR, fold change
versus hiPSC and normalized to GAPDH) showing upregulation
of forebrain markers (SIX3, FOXG1) but not
midbrain (LMX1B), hypothalamus (RAX1) or
spinal cord (HOXB4) markers. (f) Expression of ventral
forebrain genes in hSS and hCS (qPCR, normalized to GAPDH)
at day 25. (g) Average percentage of the proportion of NKX2–1 by
immunostaining in dissociated hCS or hSS at day 25. (h) Expression of
ventral forebrain genes in hSS (qPCR, normalized to GAPDH)
at day 60. (i) Expression of glutamatergic, GABAergic, dopaminergic and
cholinergic neurotransmitter identify genes in hSS (qPCR, normalized to
GAPDH) at day 60. (j) Average percentage of the
proportion of MAP2/Hoechst and GAD67/MAP2 by immunostaining in dissociated
hSS at day 60. (k, l) Expression of interneuron subtypes genes and markers
associated with interneuron migration in hSS (qPCR, normalized to
GAPDH) at day 60. Number of lines hiPSC used indicated
on each column. Data are mean ± s.e.m.
Extended Data Figure 4
Electrophysiological recordings of hCS and hSS
(a) Representative EPSC traces of recordings from hCS neurons
(sliced preparation) before (black) and during (green) exposure to the
glutamate receptor blocker kynurenic acid (1 mM) (Mann-Whitney U-test,
**P= 0.007). (b) Overlap of averaged EPSCs (red)
recorded in hCS neurons (n= 6 cells) and averaged IPSCs (black)
recorded in hSS (n= 5 cells). Data are
mean ± s.d.
ASSEMBLY OF FOREBRAIN SPHEROIDS
To develop a model for the migration of interneurons into the cerebral
cortex, we placed hCS and hSS adjacent to each other inside a conical tube (Fig. 2a). We used day 60 hCS that resembled the
mid-gestation pallium[11], a
developmental stage characterized by extensive migration of interneurons. After 3
days, the two spheroids fused (Fig. 2b). we
used viral labeling of spheroids before assembly to monitor cell migration, and used
a previously described DNA element near the Dlx1 and
Dlx2 locus (Dlxi1/2b) that labels medial ganglionic eminences
(MGE) and derivatives[15,16]. Approximately 65% of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in hSS expressed GAD67 and contained
GABA and markers for GABAergic neuron subtypes (Extended Data Fig. 5a–d). We then used live imaging to monitor
the position of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in fused hSS-hCS over
multiple weeks. We observed a progressive movement of eGFP+ cells
from hSS into hCS (Fig. 2c; Supplementary Video 1). This
movement was specific to fused hSS-hCS and unidirectional: we observed minimal
movement either from hCS into hSS in fused hSS-hCS or from hSS into hSS in fused
hSS-hSS (Fig. 2d; Extended Data Fig. 5e, f). The same pattern of migration could
be observed for hSS-hCS assembled at later stages (Extended Data Fig. 5g). When hSS were plated on a coverslip, the
migration was inefficient or absent (Extended Data
Fig. 5h–j; Supplementary Video 2) similar to rodent cultures[17]. In the first 10 days after assembly, the
vast majority of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells that migrated away from
hSS had the leading process positioned towards hCS at either a 45° or
90° angle relative to the interface (Extended
Data Fig. 5k). At 30–50 days after asssembly, 60% of the
migrated cells were localized within the outer 100 μm of hCS (Extended Data Fig. 5l), and a large population of
interneurons migrated into hCS as shown by optical clearing (Fig. 2e). Interestingly, we also observed processes of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells that briefly touched VZ-like regions,
reminiscent of rodent ventricle-directed migration[18] (Supplementary Video 3; Extended
Data Fig. 5m–o). We next investigated the fate of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in hSS after 2 weeks of migration from
hSS into hCS by isolating single cells and performing transcriptome analysis (Extended Data Fig. 6a). We found that the
majority of migrated cells expressed subpallial markers (DLX1,
DLX2, DLX5, DLX6) and
cortical interneuron markers (GAD1, GAD2,
VGAT, CELF4) (Extended Data Fig. 6b; Extended Data Fig.
7a–d). We found few cells expressing PAX6 or
TH, which are indicative of olfactory interneurons, or
SP8, GSX2 or CHAT, which are
indicative of striatal neurons, suggesting that the Dlxi1/2b reporter is primarily
labelling cortical interneurons (Extended Data Fig.
6b).
Figure 2
Cell migration in fused hSS-hCS
(a) Assembly of hCS and hSS. (b) Morphology before and
after assembly. (c) Time-lapse of migration from hSS into hCS.
(d) Assembly of hCS (AAV-hSYN1::mCherry) and hSS
(Lenti-Dlxi1/2b::eGFP). (e) iDISCO-cleared hSS-hCS. (f,
g) Saltatory migration of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in
fused hSS-hCS and (h) nucleokinesis. (I, j) Saltatory
migration of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in human fetal forebrain
and (k) nucleokinesis.
Extended Data Figure 5
Migration of Dlxi1/2::eGFP+ cells in fused
hSS-hCS
(a, b) Representative immunostaining in cryosections of hSS showing
co-expression of Dlxi1/2::eGFP and GAD67 and GABA. (c) Quantification by
immunostaining of the proportion of Dlxi1/2::eGFP+ cells
that co-express GAD67 in hSS derived using the ISA or ISRA condition
(n= 3 hiPSC lines; t-test, P= 0.35). (d) Proportion of
Dlxi1/2::eGFP and GAD67 positive cells in hSS derived using the ISA or ISRA
condition that co-express SST (t-test, P= 0.48), CR (t-test,
*P= 0.04) or CB (t-test, P= 0.43); n = 3
hiPSC lines. (e) Representative images of hSS-hCS at day 60 showing
migration of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells (from fluorescently
labeled hSS) in fused hSS-hCS but not in hSS-hSS over time. (f) The number
of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ (hSS-derived) or hSYN1::mCherry cells
(hCS-derived) that moved in hSS-hCS or hSS-hSS was quantified in snapshots
of live, intact spheroids at different time points (from day 3 to 25). The
values shown are absolute number of cells that migrated to the other side
(approximately the same area and thickness was imaged in each session);
one-way ANOVA for cells at 17 days after assembly; F(2, 32)= 8.24,
P= 0.001. (g) Representative images of fused hSS-hCS at day 91
showing migration of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells (from
fluorescently labeled hSS) into fused hSS-hCS. (h) Representative image of
an hSS that was plated on a glass coverslip and cultured for ~7
days. (i) Percentage of Dlxi1/2::eGFP inside the coverslip-plated hSS, in
the rim (0–200 μm) or beyond this region (> 200
μm). (j) Quantification of the number of saltations of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells (n= 32 cells) inside
the one-week coverslip-plated hSS, in the rim and outside this region
(one-way ANOVA, interaction F (2, 30)= 22.12, P< 0.001;
Bonferroni post-hoc ***P< 0.0001). (k)
Diagram showing the angle of movement of migrating
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells at 8–9 days after
assembly of hSS-hCS. The angle was calculated between the leading process of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells that have moved into hCS and
the fusion interface (n= 92 cells from 5 hiPSC lines). (l) Histogram
showing the distribution of the distance of migrated
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells relative to the edge of hCS in
hSS-hCS at 30–50 days after assembly. The distance was measured in
fixed 18 μm cryosections (n= 73 cells from 2 hiPSC lines).
(m, n, o) Representative examples of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+
cells migrated in the hCS that moved within a VZ-like region. The VZ-like
region contains GFAP-expressing cells, is surrounded by
TBR1+ cells and the migrated cells show GABA
expression. Supplementary
Video 2 shows movement of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+
cells that is reminiscent of the ventricular-directed migration described in
rodents.
Extended Data Figure 6
Single cell gene expression of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells
in hSS and hCS (Smart-seq2)
(a) Scheme showing the isolation by dissociation and
fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells from hSS or hCS for single cell
transcriptional analysis. (b) Violin plots showing expression in
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells of selected genes associated
with cortical, striatal and olfactory interneurons in hSS (light green,
n= 123 cells) or hCS (dark green; n= 106 cells) at 2 weeks
after assembly of hSS-hCS. (c) Violin plots showing expression in
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells (at 4 weeks after assembly of
hSS-hCS) in clusters A, B, and C (likelihood ratio test;
GAD1, CELF4: P> 0.05;
PBX3: P< e−7 for A versus B
& C; NNAT: P< e−16 for C
versus A & B, P< e−16 for B versus A
& C; MALAT1: P< e−9 for
C versus A & B; SOX11: P<
e−16 for B versus A & C, P<
e−9 for A versus B & C;
GRIP2: P< e−8 for B versus A
& C). (d) Scatter plot showing the number of genes detected
(≥ 10 reads cutoff) versus the number of reads (n= 410 cells
from combined single cell RNA-seq experiments after 2 weeks or 4 weeks of
assembly in hSS-hCS). (e) Graph illustrating biologically variable
transcripts (red circles) and non-variable transcripts (black circles) along
with the technical noise from the ERCC spike in RNAs (blue dots). Green line
shows the technical noise fit.
Extended Data Figure 7
Immunocytochemistry and pharmacology in fused hSS-hCS
(a, b, c, d) Representative images of immunostainings for SST,
GAD67, GABA, CR, CB in Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells after
migration in fused hSS-hCS. (e) Scheme illustrating the pharmacological
manipulation of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells that are migrating
in hSS-hCS. (f, g, h, i) Quantification of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cell migration before and after
exposure to 100 nM of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 (n= 8 cells from
2 hiPSC lines; paired t-tests, *P= 0.03 for number of
saltations, **P= 0.006 for saltation length,
**P= 0.006 for speed when mobile,
*P= 0.02 for path directness). (j) Plot illustrating the
trajectory of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in fused hSS-hCS
before and after exposure to AMD3100. Data are
mean ± s.e.m.
We next used confocal imaging to capture the movement of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP-labelled cells in fused hSS-hCS. Interneurons moved in a saltatory
pattern followed by extensive pauses (Fig.
2f). This characteristic, cyclical movement involved an extension of the
leading process in one direction followed by a transient swelling of the soma and
nuclear translocation (nucleokinesis) (Fig. 2g,
h). This pattern of migration is similar to that observed in
rodents[19,20], although the ratio between the length of
the leading process and the diameter of the soma in hSS-derived interneurons is
almost double the ratio in mouse interneurons (Extended Data Fig. 8). To validate the biological relevance of
interneuron migration in hSS-hCS, we performed live imaging of cells labelled with
the Dlxi1/2b::eGFP reporter in human forebrain tissue (gestational weeks, GW18 and
GW20; Fig. 2i). Dlxi1/2b::eGFP-labeled cells
in fetal tissue co-expressed GABA and NKX2–1 (Extended Data Fig. 8a–f) and displayed a similar morphology and
pattern of migration (Fig. 2j, k; Extended Data Fig. 8g–l; Supplementary Videos 4
& 5).
Extended Data Figure 8
Migration of Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP cells in mouse and human forebrain brain
slices versus hSS-hCS
(a, b, c) Representative images of human fetal cortex at GW20
showing immunostaining with antibodies against GFAP, BCL11B (CTIP2) and
GABA. (d) Representative image showing cell labeling with the
Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP reporter in human forebrain at GW18 (6 days after lentivirus
infection) (e, f) Representative immunostainings in cryosections of human
tissue at GW18 showing co-localization of Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP with NKX2-1 and
GABA. (g) Representative images showing cell labeling with the
Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP reporter in hSS-hCS (9 days after assembly), in human
forebrain (GW18) and in mouse slice cultures (E18). (h, i) Comparison of
Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP+ cell size and quantification of the
ratio of soma diameter to the length of the leading process in fused hSS-hCS
(n= 25 cells from 4 hiPSC lines), human forebrain at GW18
(n= 19 cells; black) and GW20 (n= 15 cells; gray),
hSS-derived cells cultured on E14 mouse forebrain slices (n= 14
cells), and E18 mouse forebrain slices (n= 30 cells from 2 litters)
(one-way ANOVA, interaction F(3, 97)= 11.61, P= 0.001,
Bonferroni post-hoc ***P< 0.001,
**P< 0.05). (j, k, l) Comparison of the number of
saltations (n= 56 cells from 2 hiPSC lines; one-way ANOVA,
interaction F(2, 103)= 29.27, P= 0.001, Bonferroni post-hoc
***P< 0.001), saltation length (n=
44 cells from 3 hiPSC lines; one-way ANOVA, interaction F(2, 91)=
3.0, P= 0.50), speed when mobile (n= 38 cells from 3 hiPSC
lines; one-way ANOVA, interaction F(2, 83)= 11.38, P= 0.001,
Bonferroni post-hoc ***P< 0.001) for
Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP+ in fused hSS-hCS, human fetal
forebrain (GW18: n= 19 cells; GW20: n= 15 cells), and E18
mouse forebrain slices (n= 14 cells for saltation length and speed,
n= 16 cells for number of saltations from 2 litters). Data are
mean ± s.e.m.
We tested pharmacological manipulation of interneuron migration in fused
hSS-hCS (Extended Data Fig. 7e). We imaged the
movement of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP cells before and after exposure to a CXCR4 receptor
antagonist (AMD3100). This receptor is expressed in hSS (Extended Data Fig. 3l) and plays a key role in the
migration of cortical interneurons[21]. AMD3100 treatment resulted in a significant reduction in
saltation frequency, saltation length, speed when mobile (Extended Data Fig. 7f–h) and a change in the path
directness (Extended Data Fig 7i, j; Supplementary Video 6).
USING ASSEMBLED SPHEROIDS TO MODEL TIMOTHY SYNDROME
We next investigated whether assembled hSS-hCS could be used to model
migration defects. Previous work in rodents has indicated that L-type calcium
channels (LTCCs) play a critical role in interneuron migration by regulating
saltation frequency and migration termination[17]. LTCCs have been repeatedly associated with
neuropsychiatric disease[22,23], and gain-of-function mutations in
the LTCCs-encoding CACNA1C gene lead to Timothy syndrome
(TS)– a severe neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by autism spectrum
disorder and epilepsy[24,25]. We generated hSS and hCS from hiPSCs from 3
patients with TS carrying the recurrent p.G406R substitution (Fig. 3a) and compared them to 4 control subjects (Extended Data Fig. 9a, b; Supplementary Table 1). We
did not observe defects in the differentiation of TS hiPSC lines into hSS (Extended Data Fig. 9c–g). Calcium imaging
showed increased residual calcium following depolarization in hSS-derived TS
neurons, as well as in hCS-derived TS neurons compared to control cells (Fig. 3b; Extended
Data Fig. 9h, i), similar to what we have previously shown in TS
hiPSC-derived glutamatergic neurons[26]. We investigated the migration of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in fused hSS-hCS (Fig. 3c; Extended Data Fig.
9j; Supplementary
Video 7) and found an increase in saltation frequency in neurons from all
three TS patients (Fig. 3d; Extended Data Fig. 9k) in agreement with the role
of calcium in interneuron motility[17]. Interestingly, the saltation length and the speed when mobile
were reduced in TS (Fig. 3d, e; Extended Data Fig. 9l, m) resulting in a less
efficient migration (Fig. 3f). Moreover, this
effect was cell-autonomous because migration of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+
cells from TS-hSS into control-hCS did not influence the phenotype (Fig. 3d, e; Extended Data
Fig. 9k–m). To further validate these results, we electroporated
cDNA encoding TS– and wild type (WT)– CaV1.2 into slices
of mouse E14 ganglionic eminences and performed live imaging (Extended Data Fig. 9n, o). We observed a defect in mouse
TS-CaV1.2 electroporated neurons displaying more frequent but shorter
saltations (Extended Data Fig. 9p, q). To
determine if the TS migratory phenotype was a result of LTCCs activity and could be
reversed, we treated fused hSS-hCS with LTCCs blockers (Fig. 3g; Extended Data Fig.
9r–u). We found that application of the LTCCs blocker nimodipine
significantly reduced saltation length and speed when mobile in control
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells. However, the deficit in these
parameters was rescued in TS Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells following
exposure to nimodipine. Moreover, roscovitine, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor
that increases voltage-dependent inactivation of CaV1.2[27,28], also rescued saltation length in TS
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells. These results indicate that the
migration defect in interneurons carrying the TS gain-of-function mutation can be
restored by reducing the activity of LTCCs.
Figure 3
Modeling of interneuron migration in hSS-hCS derived from Timothy
syndrome
(a) TS mutation in Cav1.2. (b) Calcium
imaging in dissociated hSS (Ctrl: n= 38 cells from 2 subjects; TS:
n= 68 cells from 2 subjects). (c) Migration of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in TS and control hSS-hCS.
(d, e) Number of saltations (Ctrl: n= 48 cells from 3
hiPSC lines derived from 3 subjects; TS: n= 51 cells from 3 hiPSC lines
derived from 3 subjects; TS-Ctrl hybrid: n= 24 cells from 5 hiPSC line
combinations from 2 TS and 2 Ctrl subjects), and saltation length (Ctrl:
n= 21 cells from 3 hiPSC lines derived from 3 subjects; TS: n=
29 cells from 3 hiPSC derived from 3 subjects; TS-Ctrl hybrid: n= 12
cells from 3 hiPSC line combinations from 2 TS and 3 Ctrl subjects); one-way
ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test
(***, P< 0.001). (f) Migration of
TS and control Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in fused hSS-hCS
(two-way ANOVA, interaction F(24, 408)= 17.71, P< 0.0001).
(g) Saltation length following exposure to nimodipine (paired
t-test; Ctrl: n= 13 cells from 3 hiPSC lines derived from 3 subjects,
***P< 0.001; TS: n= 12 cells from 2
hiPSC lines derived from 2 subjects, ***P<
0.001).
Extended Data Figure 9
Derivation of TS hSS, migration and electroporation
(a) Sequencing of PCR-amplified DNA showing the p.G406R mutation in
exon 8a of CACNA1C in TS (subject: 8303). (b)
Representative images of hiPSC colonies expressing pluripotency markers
(OCT4, SSEA4) in one TS subject (c) Level of gene expression (RT-qPCR,
normalized to GAPDH) for NKX2-1 showing no
defects in ventral forebrain induction in TS (two-way ANOVA; interaction
F(2,15)= 0.20, P= 0.81; TS versus Ctrl F(1,15)=
0.16, P= 0.68). (d–g) Representative immunostainings in
cryosections of TS hSS (day 60) showing expression of NKX2-1, GABA, MAP2,
GAD67, SST and CR. (h) Calcium imaging (Fura-2) in dissociated hCS derived
from TS subjects and controls (Ctrl: n= 81 cells from 2 subjects;
TS: n= 147 cells from 2 subjects). Quantification of residual
intracellular calcium
([Ca2+]i) following 67 mM KCl
depolarization of Ctrl and TS cells in hCS cells. Residual
[Ca2+]i was calculated by
dividing the plateau calcium (C–A) level by the peak calcium
elevation (B−A); (t-test, ***P<
0.001). (i) Quantification of
[Ca2+]i following
depolarization of Ctrl and TS cells in hSS (t-test,
***P< 0.001). (j) Representative image of
fused TS hSS-hCS showing Dlxi1/2b::eGFP expression and migration. (k, l)
Quantification of the number of saltations and saltation length of
Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP cells in fused hSS-hCS across multiple Ctrl and TS lines
(related to Fig. 3d, e). (m)
Quantification of the speed when mobile of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP cells in fused
hSS-hCS (Ctrl: n= 21 cells from 3 hiPSC lines derived from 3
subjects; TS: n= 29 cells from 3 hiPSC lines derived from 3
subjects; TS-Ctrl hybrid: n= 12 cells from 3 hiPSC line shown
combinations; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test;
***P< 0.001). (n) Electroporation of cDNA
encoding the TS– and WT– CaV1.2 channels into
slices of mouse E14 ganglionic eminences (GE). (o) Representative example of
time-lapse live imaging depicting the saltatory migration of
GFP+ cells in slices electroporated with CAG::GFP and
either the WT–or the TS– CACNA1C. (p, q)
Quantification of the number of saltations (t-test;
**P< 0.01) and saltation length (t-test;
***P< 0.001) of GFP+
cells in electroporated mouse forebrain slices (WT: n= 33 cells; TS:
n= 23 cells; from 3 litters). (r) Scheme illustrating
pharmacological manipulation of LTCC during live imaging of fused hSS-hCS.
(s) Quantification of speed when mobile following exposure to the LTCC
blocker nimodipine (5 μM) (paired t-test; Ctrl: n= 13 cells
from 3 hiPSC lines derived from 3 subjects,
***P< 0.001; TS: n= 12 cells from 2
hiPSC lines derived from 2 subjects, **P< 0.005).
(t) Quantification of saltation length following exposure to roscovitine (15
μM) (paired t-test; Ctrl: n= 7 cells from 2 hiPSC lines
derived from 2 subject, **P< 0.005; TS: n=
12 cells from 2 hiPSC lines derived from 2 subjects;
***P< 0.001). (u) Quantification of speed
when mobile following exposure to roscovitine (15 μM) (paired
t-tests; Ctrl: n= 9 cells from 2 hiPSC lines derived from 2
subjects, ***P< 0.001; TS: n= 12
cells from 2 hiPSC lines derived from 2 subjects; P= 0.05). Data are
mean ± s.e.m.
INTEGRATION OF INTERNEURONS IN ASSEMBLED SPHEROIDS
To investigate the hSS-derived neurons that migrated into hCS, we examined
their single cell transcriptome at 4 weeks after assembly (Fig. 4a). t-SNE analysis indicated 3 clusters (Fig. 4b), with
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in hSS distributed primarily in cluster
A, while Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells migrated into hCS primarily
distributed in clusters B and C (Fig. 4c).
Cells in all clusters expressed similar levels of GAD1 and
CELF4, but cluster B and C down-regulated the subpallial marker
PBX3 (Extended Data Fig.
6c; Supplementary Table
4). Migrated cells displayed expression changes in genes previously
associated with interneuron migration, including ERBB4,
NNAT, MALAT1, SOX11 and
NXPH1[29,30] (Fig. 4d). These neurons also had higher levels of activity-dependent
genes, including FOS, the AMPA-receptor trafficking regulator
GRIP2[31] and
IGF1[32], as
well as the disease-related genes RASD1[33], TCF4[34] (Fig.
4d; Extended Data Fig. 6c). We next
examined dendrites of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in hSS and in fused
hSS-hCS. We found that hSS-derived cells that moved into hCS increased the
complexity of their branching (Fig. 4e; Extended Data Fig. 10a, b). We then measured
their electrical properties in hSS before and after assembly. We found that
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells that had migrated into hCS had double
the maximum action potential generation rate as compared to
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in unfused hSS or to non-migrated cells
in fused hSS-hCS (Fig. 4f; Extended Data Fig. 10c). We then assessed the
integration of migrated neurons by using AT and observed the presence of gephyrin
(GPHN), a postsynaptic protein localized to GABAergic synapses, in hCS fused to hSS
but not in unfused hCS (Fig. 4d; Extended Data Fig. 10d). We constructed
‘synaptograms’ consisting of a series of high-resolution sections
through a single synapse, and found colocalization of eGFP from Dlxi1/2b-labeled
cells with the presynaptic proteins SYN1 and VGAT and adjacent to the postsynaptic
protein GPHN (Extended Data Fig. 10e). To
investigate the presence of functional synapses in migrated
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ neurons, we performed whole-cell voltage
clamp recordings in sliced hSS-hCS. We found that Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+
that migrated into hCS display both excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs,
downward deflecting) and IPSCs (upward deflecting) (Fig. 4h). Moreover, after migration into hCS, these cells primarily
receive EPSCs rather than IPSCs and their synaptic input increases approximately
3-fold (Fig. 4i; Extended Data Fig. 10f; Supplementary Table 5). In parallel, glutamatergic neurons from
hCS, which exhibit only EPSCs before assembly, also begin receiving IPSCs and show
an overall increase in synaptic input following the migration of interneurons from
hSS (Fig. 4j; Extended Data Fig. 10g). Lastly, to assess the functional integration of
hCS and hSS neurons into neural networks, we applied electrical stimulation to the
hCS side of assembled hSS-hCS to trigger glutamate release from excitatory neurons
in the vicinity of the stimulation electrode while simultaneously recording EPSCs
and IPSCs in Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells that migrated into hCS (Extended Data Fig. 10h, i). We found that
electrical simulation evoked EPSCs (eEPSCs) immediately following simulation
(> 5 ms); this was followed by presumed multisynaptic IPSCs (< 15
ms) that were sensitive to gabazine. Together, these data demonstrate that hSS
integrate with hCS to assemble functional human microcircuits in 3D cultures.
Figure 4
Functional integration of interneurons in fused hSS-hCS
(a) Isolation of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells for
transcriptional analysis. (b) t-SNE visualization of single cell
gene expression at day 121 (4 weeks after hSS-hCS assembly). (c)
Distribution across clusters (χ2-test,
χ2= 43.39, P< 0.0001). (d)
Expression of ERBB4, NXPH1, IGF1,
TCF4, FOS, RAD1. (e)
Morphology of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells before and after
migration into hCS (f) Action potential generation in
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells (one-way ANOVA, F(2, 30)=
1.25; ***P< 0.001; Bonferroni post-hoc,
**P< 0.01; ***P< 0.001).
(g) GABAergic synapse (by AT) on the pallial side of hCS-hSS
with SYN1, GPHN and VGAT. (h) EPSCs and IPSCs in
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells after migration. (i)
Synaptic responses in Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells (two-way ANOVA,
interaction F(2, 61)= 18.46, P< 0.0001; Bonferroni post-hoc for
EPSCs, ***P< 0.0001,
**P< 0.001). (j) Synaptic responses in
excitatory cells (two-way ANOVA, cortical neurons in hCS before and after
assembly F(1, 26)= 5.6, P< 0.05; Bonferroni post-hoc for IPSC,
*P< 0.05).
Extended Data Figure 10
Characterization of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells after
migration
(a) Representative images of 3D–reconstructed
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cell morphologies before and after
migration from hSS into hCS. (b) Quantification of dendritic branching of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in hSS (n= 58 cells)
and in hCS (n= 55 cells) of fused hSS-hCS (two-way ANOVA;
interaction F(2, 129)= 11.29, P< 0.001; Bonferroni post-hoc
*P< 0.05, ***P< 0.001). (c)
Representative examples of action potentials (slice recordings) in
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in unfused hSS, in hSS of fused
hSS-hCS and in hCS after migration in fused hSS-hCS. (d) AT showing
expression of the GABAergic synapse marker GPHN (green) colocalized with
SYN1 (red) in hCS of fused hSS-hCS but not in unfused hCS; the glutamatergic
marker PSD95 (cyan) colocalized with SYN1 is found in both fused and unfused
hCS (equal volumes 1.2 μm deep). (e) AT of a
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ synapse illustrating the
colocalization with SYN1 (red), GPHN (cyan), and VGAT (white); 5 consecutive
70 nm sections (3 × 3 μm). (f) Representative examples of
whole-cell voltage clamp recordings of IPSCs and EPSCs from
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in unfused hSS, in fused
hCS-hSS, or after migration in hCS (g) Representative examples of whole-cell
voltage clamp recordings of IPSCs and EPSCs in cells recorded from unfused
hCS cells and fused hCS cells. (h) Electrical stimulation and patch clamp
recording in fused hSS-hCS showing evoked EPSCs and IPSCs before (black) and
after exposure to 10 μM gabazine (red). (i) Average peri-stimulus
synaptic events (IPSCs and EPSCs) in Dlxi1/2::eGFP+ cells
recorded in the hCS side of fused hSS-hCS before and after electrical
stimulation (paired t-test, *P< 0.05). Data are
mean ± s.e.m.
DISCUSSION
We demonstrate the generation of a human 3D microphysiological system that
includes functionally-integrated glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons. This platform
has several advantages in comparison to previous adherent or 3D methods[9,10,16,35-38]. First, it involves the directed differentiation of subdomains
of the forebrain that functionally interact in development. In contrast to
whole-brain organoids and organoids resembling broader brain regions[35,38], this approach allows for modularity by combining
separately patterned spheroids into multi-region neural 3D cultures. Second, this
system captures in vitro more elaborate developmental processes,
including the saltatory migration of interneurons towards the cerebral cortex. Using
live imaging of the human forebrain, we demonstrate that this migration is
accurately recapitulated with our assembled 3D platform. Third, by enabling their
migration into an active neural network, interneurons integrate into a
synaptically-connected microphysiological system without the requirement of seeding
onto rodent cortical cultures or brain slices. Assembling networks using this
modular system may facilitate the study of excitation to inhibition interplay during
cortical development.We also demonstrate that forebrain subdomains derived from hiPSCs and fused
in vitro can be used to identify the transcriptional changes
associated with interneuron migration and to model disease processes that are
otherwise inaccessible. We find that cortical interneurons derived from TS subjects
display a cell-autonomous migration defect whereby they move more frequently but
less efficiently. Moreover, the TS interneuron defect is rescued by
pharmacologically manipulating LTCC. This aberrant interneuron migration, taken
together with our previous studies in cortical glutamatergic neurons[26,39,40], suggest the
presence of abnormal cortical development and function in TS.Lastly, the in vitro specification of various subdomains of
the developing human brain from hPSC and their assembly into 3D cultures opens the
opportunity for studying the interaction of specific neuronal cell types and for
generating and probing neural circuits within personalized human microphysiological
systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Culture of hPSCs
The hPSC lines used in this study were validated using standardized
methods as previously shown[26,41]. Cultures were tested for and
maintained Mycoplasma free. A total of 6 control hiPSC lines derived from
fibroblasts harvested from 5 subjects (2 males and 3 females), plus the human
embryonic stem cell line H9, and 7 hiPSC lines derived from fibroblasts
harvested from 3 subjects with TS (1 female and 2 males) carrying the pG406R
mutation were used for experiments (Supplementary Table 1; subjects 7643 and 9862 are
from[26,41]). The TS point mutation in exon 8a of
CACNA1C was verified by PCR as previously
described[41]. The hiPSC
line H20961 was derived by the Gilad laboratory[42]. Approval for this study was obtained
from the Stanford IRB Panel and informed consent was obtained from all
subjects.
Generation from hPSC of hCS and hSS
Human pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC or hESC) were cultured on
inactivated mouse embryonic fibroblast feeders (EmbryoMax PMEF; Millipore) in
hPSC medium containing DMEM/F12 (1:1, Life Technologies, 11330), Knockout Serum
(20%, Life Technologies, 10828), non-essential amino acids (1 mM, Life
Technologies, 11140), GlutaMax (1: 200, Life Technologies, 35050),
β-mercaptoethanol (0.1 mM; Sigma-Aldrich M3148), penicillin and
streptomycin (1:100, Life Technologies, 15070), and supplemented with FGF2 (10
ng/ml diluted in 0.1% BSA; R&D Systems).The generation of hCS from hPSC was performed as previously
described[11]. To
initiate the generation of hCS or hSS, intact hiPSC colonies were lifted from
the plates using dispase (0.35 mg/ml) and transferred into ultralow attachment
plastic dishes (Corning) in hPSC medium supplemented with the two SMAD
inhibitors dorsomorphin (DM; 5 μM; Sigma) and SB-431542 (SB; 10
μM, Tocris), and the ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 (10 μM; EMD
Chemicals). For the first five days, the hPSC medium was changed every day and
supplemented with dorsomorphin and SB-431542. On the sixth day in suspension,
neural spheroids were transferred to neural medium (NM) containing Neurobasal-A
(Life Technologies, 10888), B-27 supplement without vitamin A (Life
Technologies, 12587), GlutaMax (Life Technologies, 1:100), penicillin and
streptomycin (Life Technologies, 1:100) and supplemented with the growth factors
EGF (20 ng/ml; R&D Systems) and FGF2 (20 ng/ml; R&D Systems)
until day 24. For the generation of hSS, the medium was supplemented with
additional small molecules during the first 23 days in culture; a schematic
showing the recipes is presented in Supplementary Fig. 4a). The hSS-IS
condition involved the addition of the Wnt pathway inhibitor IWP-2 (5
μM; Selleckchem) from day 4 until day 24, and the SHH pathway agonist
SAG (smoothened agonist; 100 nM; Selleckchem) from day 12 to day 24. The hSS-ISA
condition also included IWP-2 (inhibitor of WNT production–2) and SAG
(smoothened agonist) with the addition of allopregnanolone (AlloP 100 nM; Cayman
Chemicals) from day 15 to day 23, while the hSS-ISRA condition included AlloP
(100nM) from day 15–23, and a brief exposure (day 12–15) to
retinoic acid (RA 100 nM; Sigma). From day 25 to 42, the NM for both the hCS and
hSS conditions, was supplemented with the growth factors BDNF (20 ng/ml;
Peprotech) and NT3 (20 ng/ml; Peprotech) with medium changes every other day.
From day 43 onwards, hCS and hSS were maintained in unsupplemented NM with
medium changes every four to six days.
Viral labeling and assembly of neural spheroids
The viral infection of the 3D neural spheroids was performed as
previously described[11,43]. Briefly, hCS or hSS were
transferred to a 1.5 ml microcentrifudge Eppendorf tube containing 300
μl ΝΜ with virus and incubated overnight. The next day,
neural spheroids were transferred into fresh NM medium in ultralow attachment
plates. Lentivirus (Lenti-Dlxi1/2b::eGFP; construct reported and applied in
refs[15,16] and received from J.L. Rubenstein) was
generated by transfecting HEK293T cells with Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher
Scientific) and concentrating the supernatant with the Lenti-X concentrator
(Clontech) 72 hrs later. Adenovirus (AAV-DJ1-hSYN::mCherry) was generated in the
Stanford Gene Vector and Virus Core at Stanford.To assemble the forebrain spheroids, hCS and hSS (~60 to 90 days
of in vitro differentiation), which were virally labeled
8–10 days before, were transferred to a 1.5 ml microcentrifudge
Eppendorf tube for three days and placed in an incubator. During this time, more
than 95% of hCS and hSS fused. These hSS-hCS cultures were carefully
transferred into 24 well ultralow attachment plates (Corning) using a cut P-1000
pipette tip and medium changes were performed very gently every two to three
days.
Cryopreservation
hCS were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 8%
sucrose for 30 min to 2 hrs. They were then washed in PBS, transferred to
15% sucrose solution overnight at 4°C and then to 30%
sucrose for 48–72 hrs. Subsequently, they were transferred into
embedding medium (Tissue-Tek OCT Compound 4583, Sakura Finetek), snap-frozen on
dry ice and stored at −80°C. For immunohistochemistry, 10 to 20
μm thick sections were cut using a cryostat (Leica). Human brain tissue
was fixed in 4% PFA for 48 hrs, washed in PBS and transferred to
30% sucrose for one week. Sections were then embedded in OCT and
30% sucrose (1:1) and sectioned into 30 μm sections using a
Leica cryostat.
Immunohistochemistry
Cryosections were washed with PBS to remove excess OCT and blocked in
10% goat serum (NGS), 0.3% Triton X-100 diluted in PBS for 1 hr
at room temperature. The sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C
with primary antibodies diluted in PBS containing 10% GS and
0.3% Triton X-100. PBS was used to wash off the primary antibodies and
the cryosections were incubated with secondary antibodies in PBS with
10% NGS and 0.3% Triton X–100 for 1 hr. The following
primary antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry: anti–NKX2.1
(rabbit, 1:200; Santa Cruz: sc-13040), anti–MAP2 (guinea pig, 1:1,000;
Synaptic Systems: 188004), anti–GABA (rabbit, 1:1,000; Sigma: A2052),
anti–GAD67 (mouse, 1:1,000; Millipore: MAB5406), anti–SST (rat,
1:200; Millipore: MAB354), anti–CR (rabbit, 1:1,000; Swant: CR7697),
anti–CB (rabbit, 1:1,000; Swant: CB38), anti–PV (rabbit,
1:6,000; Swant: PV27), anti–PV (mouse 1:1,000; Millipore: MAB1572),
anti–GFP (chicken, 1:1,500; GeneTex: GTX13970), anti–DCX (guinea
pig, 1:1,000; Millipore: AB2253); anti–TBR1 (rabbit, 1:200; Abcam:
AB31940), anti–GFAP (rabbit, 1:1,000; DAKO Z0334), anti–CTIP2
(rat, 1:300; Abcam: AB18465), anti–OCT4 (rabbit, 1:200, Cell Signaling
Technology), anti–SSEA4 (mouse, 1:200, Cell Signaling Technology).
AlexaFluo Dyes (Life Technologies) were used at 1:1000 dilution for amplifying
the signal. Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33258 (Life Technologies).
Cryosections were mounted for microscopy on glass slides using Aquamount (Thermo
Scientific) and imaged on a Zeiss M1 Axioscope or Leica TCS SP8 confocal
microscope. Images were processed in ImageJ (Fiji).
Dissociation of hCS and hSS
For the enzymatic dissociation of hCS and hSS for culture in monolayer
and immunocytochemistry, spheroids were incubated with Accutase (Innovative Cell
Technologies) for 25 min at 37°C, washed with NM and gently triturated
using a P-200 pipet. Cells were plated on poly-ornithine/laminin (Sigma) coated
glass coverslips (15 mm; Werner) at a density of ~1 spheroid per two
coverslips in NM supplemented with BDNF and NT3.To dissociate hCS and hSS for single cell profiling, we adapted a
previously published protocol used for primary human fetal brain
tissue[44]. Briefly, up
to 6 spheroids were chopped using a #10 blade and then incubated in
papain enzyme solution (27.3 U/ml; Worthington), EBSS (1×, Sigma),
0.46% Sucrose (Sigma), 26 mM NaHCO3 (Sigma), 0.5 mM EDTA
(Sigma) at 37°C for 70 min in an incubator (5% CO2).
The digested spheroids were then washed and carefully triturated in a trypsin
inhibitor solution EBSS, 0.46% Sucrose (Sigma), 26 mM NaHCO3
(Sigma), 15–30 mgTrypsin Inhibitor (Sigma). After centrifugation, the
pellet was resuspended in 0.2% BSA diluted in PBS and supplemented with
Y-27632 (10 μM; EMD Chemicals) and the cells were used for FACS.
Mouse slice cultures
Organotypic cultures of mouse coronal forebrain slices were prepared
following published methods[45]
with some modifications. Whole brains from E14–E18 mouse embryos were
embedded in 4% low-melting point agarose and slices were cut at
250–300 μm using a Leica VT1200 vibrotome in complete HBSS (100
ml of 10× HBSS without Ca or Mg, 2.5 ml of 1M HEPES buffer at pH 7.4, 30
ml of 1M D-glucose, 10 ml of 100 mM CaCl2, 10 ml of 100 mM MgSO4, and 4 ml of 1
M NaHCO3). Slices with visible forebrain structures were placed in membrane
inserts (diameter, 13 mm; pore size, 8 μm; Costar) coated with
Poly-L-orthinine and Laminin (Sigma) overnight. They were cultured in a Basal
Medium Eagle (39 mL, Life Technologies, #21010046) supplemented with
12.9 ml of complete HBSS, 1.35 ml of 1M D-glucose, 250 μl of 200 mM
GlutaMax (Life Technologies) and 5% heat-inactivated horse serum (Life
Technologies, 26050070). Slices were imaged using a Leica SP8 confocal
microscope. Approval for rodent experiments was obtained from the Stanford
University’s Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care (APLAC).
Electroporation of mouse slices
Coronal slices of mouse embryonic forebrain at E14 were prepared as
described above. Sections were transferred into tissue culture dishes containing
complete HBSS for ~1 hour, after which CAG-Cav1.2 (WT– or
TS–CACNA1C) plasmids were focally co-injected with
CAG::GFP at a ratio of 1:0.5 directly into the ganglionic eminence through a
glass micropipette. Cav1.2 overexpression constructs were generated by insertion
of PCR-amplified WT– and TS–Cav1.2 coding sequences from
dihydropyridine-insensitive Cav1.2 constructs[39] into pCAGIG (kind gift from C. Cepko
through Addgene, plasmid 11159)[46]. Slices were then electroporated using two horizontally
oriented platinum electrodes powered by a BTX Square Pulse Electroporator, and
placed onto cell culture membrane inserts for subsequent live imaging 48 hrs
later as described below.
Human Tissue
Human tissue was obtained under a protocol approved by the Research
Compliance Office at Stanford University. The tissue was processed using an
adapted protocol[47]. Briefly,
GW18 or GW20 frontal brain tissue was embedded in 4% low-melting point
agarose in bubbled artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF: 125 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM
KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 25 mM
NaHCO3, 25 mM D-(+)-Glucose) and either sectioned using a
Leica VT1200 Vibratome at 300–500 μm in ice-cold, bubbled ACSF,
or cut using the sharp end of a gauge–22 needle to obtain 1–2 mm
thick sections. The sections were then placed in tissue culture plates
containing culture media (66% BME, 25% Hanks, 5% FBS,
1% N-2, 1% penicillin, streptomycin and glutamine; all from
Invitrogen) and 0.66% D-(+)-Glucose (Sigma) and incubated
(37°C, 5% CO2) with the Dlxi1/2b::eGFP lentivirus for
30 min to 1 hr. Sections were then transferred to cell culture membrane inserts
(diameter, 13 mm; pore size, 8 μm; Costar) and incubated in culture
media at 37°C, 8% O2, 5% CO2 for up to 8
days. Half media changes were performed every other day. After ~5 days
in culture, Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells could be detected and were
subsequently imaged as described below.
Live imaging and analysis of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cell
migration
The migration of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells was imaged for
8–12 hrs under environmentally controlled conditions (37°C,
5% CO2) in intact, fused hSS-hCS using a confocal microscope
with a motorized stage (Leica SP8). Fused hSS-hCS were transferred to a well of
a 96–well plate (glass-bottom plates, Corning) in 200 μl of NM.
Spheroids were incubated in an environmentally controlled chamber for
30–60 min prior to imaging. During a given recording session, up to 8
fused hSS-hCS were imaged at a depth of 50–150 μm and at a rate
of 15–20 min/frame. For pharmacological manipulation, cells were imaged
for 12 hrs to record a baseline. Then, the media was carefully removed and new
media with small molecules (AMD3100 at 100 nM; nimodipine at 5 μM; or
roscovitine at 15 μM) was gently added to the well. The field of view
was readjusted to capture the previous region of interest and cells in fused
hSS-hCS were imaged for an additional 12 hrs.For imaging of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells, E17–E18
slices were placed on inserts and infected with Dlxi1/2b::eGFP lentivirus after
24 hrs. The slices were imaged 2 days later using a Leica SP8 confocal
microscope (see above).For measuring the branch to soma length ratio of human cells on mouse
slices, hSSs infected with Dlxi1/2b::eGFP lentivirus were dissociated and placed
on top of E13–14 mouse slices, which were placed on cell culture inserts
8–24 hrs before. The hSS-derived Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+
cells were imaged with the Leica SP8 confocal microscope system at least 48 hrs
later.The migration of mouse Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells or
Cav1.2–electroporated cells and the migration of human fetal
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP–infected cells were both imaged with the same setting
described for intact, fused hSS-hCS. Slices were kept on the cell culture
inserts during imaging.For quantification of migration of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+
cells after plating on coverslips, intact hSS were plated on
Poly-ornithine/laminin (Sigma) coated glass coverslips (15 mm; Werner). Cells
were imaged 7–10 days after using a confocal microscope (Leica SP8) as
described above.ImageJ and the Chemotaxis & Migration Tool (Ibidi) were used for
the post-acquisition analysis of cell mobility. The StackReg plugin in ImageJ
was used to correct for minor drifts during imaging. To estimate the length of
individual saltations, Dlxi1/2b::eGFP cells displaying a swelling of the soma
were identified, and distance (in μm) to the new position of the soma
following nucleokinesis was recorded manually. The time necessary for this
movement was used to calculate the speed when mobile. To estimate directness of
movement, the x and y coordinates of each cell per frame and time were extracted
with the Manual Tracking plugin (ImageJ) and the Chemotaxis & Migration
Tool (Ibidi) was used to calculate the Accumulated (A) and Euclidian (E)
distances traveled per cell over time. Path directness was calculated as the E/A
ratio. Videos were processed using ImageJ and Final Cut Pro X.
Fura-2 calcium imaging of hSS or hCS cultures
Dissociated hSS (day 62) or hCS (day 123) derived from control and TS
lines were cultured on poly-L-ornithine and laminin (Sigma) coated coverslips
for 4–5 days. The cultures were incubated with 1 μM Fura-2
acetoxymethyl ester (Fura-2AM; Invitrogen) for 25 min at 37°C in NM
medium, washed for 5 min and placed in a perfusion chamber on the stage of an
inverted fluorescence microscope (TE2000U; Nikon). Cells were then stimulated
with high-KCl Tyrode’s solution (67 mM KCl, 67 mM NaCl2 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 30 mM glucose and 25 mM HEPES, pH
7.4). Imaging was performed at room temperature (25°C) on an
epifluorescence microscope equipped with an excitation filter wheel and an
automated stage. Openlab software (PerkinElmer) was used to collect and quantify
time-lapse excitation ratio images. Fluorescence images were analyzed using the
IGOR Pro software (WaveMetrics). Residual calcium following high-KCl
depolarization was calculated by dividing the plateau calcium level by the peak
calcium elevation ((C – A)/(B – A); Fig. 3b).
Fluo-4 calcium imaging in intact hSS
Intact hSS at day 43–52 were incubated with 10 μM Fluo-4
acetoxymethyl ester (Fluo-4AM; Invitrogen) for 30 min in NM media followed by a
15 min wash with NM. A Leica SP8 confocal microscope with a resonant scanner was
used for imaging. Spontaneous calcium activity was recorded for 10 min (one
frame every 8–10 s) in one 10 μm z-stack plane. Fluorescence
intensity (F) was exported as mean gray values in ImageJ. Signal decay was
controlled by subtracting the mean fluorescence of the background
(Fb). To estimate changes in intracellular calcium, ΔF was
computed as (Fcell– Fb)/F0, where
F0 represents the minimum F value per cell across the whole 10
min of recording from which Fb was subtracted. A ΔF
>1.2 was defined as a spike.
iDISCO
To optically clear fixed fused spheroids, we adapted the iDISCO protocol
described by Renier et al[48].
Briefly, after fixation with 4% PFA for 3 hrs, spheroids were dehydrated
with a day-long methanol (MetOH) dilution series (20% to 100%
MetOH). Next, they were incubated in 5% H2O2
overnight at 4°C. The following day, they were rehydrated with a reverse
MetOH dilution series and incubated overnight in 0.2% Triton-X,
20% DMSO, 0.3 M Glycine/PBS at 37°C. The spheroids were then
blocked with 0.2% Triton-X, 10% DMSO, 6% goat serum/PBS
at 37°C for 2 days, followed by a heparin treatment for 2 hrs (PTwH:
0.2% Tween-20, 10 μg/mL Heparin/PBS) to reduce non-specific
antibody binding. They were next incubated with a chicken anti–GFP
(1:1500; GeneTex: GTX13970) antibody for 2 days in PTwH with 5% DMSO and
3% goat serum at 37°C. After a day-long wash series with PTwH, a
secondary antibody diluted in PTwH, 3% goat serum was added for an
additional two days at 37°C. After 2 days of PTwH washes, the spheroids
were cleared by a three-step tetrahydrofuran (THF) series (80%,
100%, 100% THF/H2O), a 10 min dichloromethane step,
and a short incubation in dichloromethane (DBE). The cleared spheroids were
stored and imaged in DBE on a Leica SP8 confocal microscope.
Real time quantitative PCR (qPCR)
mRNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit and RNase-Free DNase set
(Qiagen), and template cDNA was prepared by reverse transcription using the
SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix for qRT-PCR (Life Technologies).
Real time qPCR was performed using SYBR GREEN (Roche) on a ViiA7 machine
(Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies). Data was processed using the
QuantStudio RT-PCR software (Applied Biosystems). Primers used are listed in
Supplementary Table
2.
Single cell gene expression (BD Resolve system)
To capture transcriptomic information of hiPSCs-derived hCS and hSS (IS)
single-cells, we used the BD Resolve system (BD Genomics, Menlo Park, CA) as
previously reported with modifications[13]. Multiple hCS or hSS at day 105 of differentiation were
combined and dissociated enzymatically into single cells, and processed in one
batch. Single cell capture was achieved by random distribution of a single cell
suspension across >200,000 microwells via a limited dilution approach.
Beads with oligonucleotide barcodes were added to saturation such that a bead
was paired with a cell in a microwell. Cell lysis buffer was added such that
poly-adenylated RNA molecules hybridize to the beads. Beads were collected into
a single tube for reverse transcription. Upon cDNA synthesis, each cDNA molecule
was tagged on the 5′ end (i.e., 3′ end of mRNA transcript) with
a molecular index and cell label indicating its cell of origin. Whole
transcriptome libraries were prepared using the BD Resolve single cell whole
transcriptome amplification workflow. Briefly, second strand cDNA was
synthesized, followed by ligation of adaptor for universal amplification.
Eighteen cycles of PCR were used to amplify the adaptor ligated cDNA products.
Sequencing libraries were prepared using random priming PCR of the whole
transcriptome amplification products to enrich the 3′ end of the
transcripts linked with the cell label and molecular indices.Sequencing libraries were quantified using a High Sensitivity DNA Chip
(Agilent) on a Bioanalyzer 2100 and the Qubit High Sensitivity DNA Assay (Thermo
Fisher Scientific). 1.5 pM of the library for each sample was loaded onto a
NextSeq 500 system and sequenced using High Output sequencing kits (75 ×
2bp) (Illumina).The BD Resolve analysis pipeline was used to process sequencing data
(fastq files). Cell labels and molecular indices were identified, and gene
identity was determined by alignment against the gencode comprehensive hg19
reference. A table containing molecule counts per gene per cell was output.
7,663 and 4,983 cells were identified for hCS and hSS, respectively, with an
average number of reads of ~14,800, an average of ~3,710
molecules and ~1,700 number genes detected per cell with an average
molecular index coverage (i.e. number of times a molecule was sequenced) of
~2. A total of 34,242 genes were detected across all cells. Cells with
mitochondrial gene (with gene symbol starting with MT) content
> 25%, were discarded retaining 7,126 and 4,712 cells for hCS
and hSS (IS), respectively. Pseudogenes were removed. The distribution of reads
per single cell is shown in Extended Data Fig.
2m. For visualization and clustering, the data tables of the two
libraries were concatenated, and the combined table was further reduced to
retain only the most variable genes using the method outlined in Macosko
et al[49],
yielding 1,102 genes. t–SNE projection of the data was performed using
default parameters[14]. To
determine the set of genes contributing to the separation of cell clusters,
differential gene expression analysis (DEseq) based on negative binomial
distribution[50] was
conducted to compare gene expression profiles in cells in each cluster versus
those in the rest of the data set. Genes were ranked by smallest P values
(expressed in terms of –log10) and the list of significantly
over-represented genes with –log10 (P-value) < 10 of each
cluster is provided as Supplementary Table 3. Patterns of expression for the top 25 genes
in each cluster are shown in Extended Data Fig.
2e–l). A very small group of hCS-derived cells clustered with
the GABAergic interneuron subdomain, and differential gene expression indicated
that these cells expressed TBR1, RELN,
PAX6 and CALB2.
Single cell RNA-seq (Smart-seq2)
For assessing gene expression in Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+
cells in hSS and in hCS of fused hSS-hCS, we used a single-cell RNA-Seq assay
adapted from the Smart-seq-2 protocol reported by Picelli et
al[51]. In
short, hSS and hCS that had been fused for ~15 days were separated with
a scalpel blade and dissociated independently as described. Single-cells were
isolated by FACS into a 96-well PCR plate containing 5 μl of lysis
buffer containing 0.04% Triton X-100 (10%, Sigma BioUltra), 0.1
μl recombinant RNase inhibitor (TaKaRa), 1 μl Oligo-dT30VN (10
μM), 1 μl of 10 mM dNTP mix (Fermentas) and nuclease-free
H20 for a final volume of 5 μl. A known number of
internal RNA control (ERCC) was added to the lysis master mix to estimate the
technical variability between the wells of the same plate and between plates.
Reverse transcription and PCR amplification were performed using the parameters
described by Picelli et al[51]. The quality of the cDNA library was checked using a
High-Sensitivity DNA chip (Agilent Bioanalyzer). Libraries were prepared using
the Nextera XT library prep kit (96 index primers, Illumina). Because the
Nextera XT kit is very sensitive to the concentration of cDNA, we screened
pre-amplified cDNA libraries from all plates using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay kit
and used 125 pg cDNA from each positive well to further process the tagmentation
and indexing. Twelve additional PCR cycles were performed to further enrich for
pre-amplified tagmented DNA. The quality of the tagmented library was checked
using the High-Sensitivity Bioanalyzer chip. The final pooled library was
diluted to 2 nM using the elution buffer (Qiagen), and 10 pM was loaded on an
Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument for sequencing. Libraries were sequenced to
obtain 50 bp single end reads (TruSeq Rapid kit, Illumina) with 8 additional
cycles for indexing. On average, we obtained 2 million pass filter reads per
single cell (Extended Data Fig. 6c). We
considered a gene expressed if there were at least 10 reads detected for that
gene. Cells that expressed more than 1,000 genes and <10%
mitochondrial RNAs were kept for analysis. To avoid bias during FACS from RNA
contamination from the glutamatergic neurons on the hCS side of the fused
hSS-hCS, we analyzed STMN2+ cells that did
not express SLC17A6 or SLC17A7. To control for
technical noise, we used a quantitative statistical analysis[52] to detect biological variable genes and
used them for further analysis. To cluster and visualize the cells, we used the
t-SNE method in the computational software package
Seurat[53].
Array tomography (AT)
AT was used to collect high-resolution images of synapses within neural
spheroids using previously published protocols[11,54]. Briefly, fused hSS-hCS were fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline. To preserve GFP fluorescence, the
tissue was dehydrated with up to 70% alcohol only, with processing
through 50% ethanol, 70% ethanol, 1:3 70% ethanol:LR
White Resin (LRW, medium grade, SPI supplies), and LRW overnight before
embedding in LRW. The embedded tissue was sectioned into ribbons of 70 nm thick
sections (~30 sections/ribbon) and each ribbon was immunostained in
2–3 rounds of staining with the antibodies eluted after each round. The
following primary antibodies were used for immunostaining: anti–GFP
(chicken, 1:200; Genetex: 13970, 1:200), anti–SYN1 (rabbit, Cell
Signalling: 5297S, 1:500), anti–PSD95 (rabbit, Cell Signalling: 3450S),
anti–VGUT1 (guinea pig, 1:5000; Millipore: AB5905),
anti–Gephyrin (mouse, 1:100; BD Biosciences: 612632), anti–VGAT
(guinea pig, 1:200; Synaptic Systems 131004), anti–VGAT (mouse, 1:200;
Synaptic Systems: 131011), anti–GFAP (chicken, 1:300; Aves),
anti–MAP2 (guinea pig, 1:1000; Synaptic Systems: 188004). Sections were
visualized on a Zeiss Axio Imager.Z1 upright fluorescence microscope using
AxioVision software (rel 4.7, Zeiss). Images were processed and registered using
FIJI/ImageJ with standard and custom plugins
(code.google.com/p/smithlabsoftware). FIJI/ImageJ was used for volume
reconstruction.
Electrophysiology
Sections of hCS, hSS (day 96–141) or fused hSS-hCS
(29–53 daf) for physiological recordings were obtained using an approach
we previously described[11].
Briefly, spheroids were incubated in bicarbonate buffered artificial
cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) at 23°C and equilibrated with a mixture of
95% O2 and 5% CO2. The aCSF solution
contained: 126 mM NaCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM glucose, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25
mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, and 2 mM
CaCl2. Slicing was performed using a Leica VT1200 vibratome.
Immediately after sectioning, slices were moved to a circulation chamber
containing oxygenated aCSF at 32°C. For patch-clamp recording, cells
were identified by the presence of a fluorescent reporter using an upright
Axoscop II microscope (Zeiss). Recording electrodes of borosilicate glass had a
resistance of 4–6 MΩ when filled with internal solution. A low
Cl− internal solution was used to distinguish between
EPSCs and IPSCs containing: 145 mM K+ gluconate, 0.1 mM
CaCl2, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 0.2 mM EGTA, 4 mM
Na+ phosphocreatine. Cl− reversal was
calculated to be at −91 mV according to the Nernst equation. A high
Cl− internal solution was used to measure EPSCs in a
subset of unfused hSS containing: 135 mM CsCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 3 mM
MgATP, 0.3 mM GTP. The Cl− reversal potential was calculated
to be 0 mV according to the Nernst equation. IPSCs were blocked by application
of the GABAA receptor antagonist gabazine (10 μM, Abcam),
which was added to superfused aCSF. EPSCs were blocked by application of the
glutamate receptor antagonist kynurenic acid (1 mM, Abcam), which was added to
superfused aCSF. Electrical simulation was delivered using a bipolar tungsten
electrode (FHS) placed 200–400 μM away from a recorded neuron.
Stimulations were delivered to slices for 0.1 ms at 300 μV and separated
by at least 10 s. Inward EPSCs and outward IPSPs were recorded by filling the
patch pipette with a low chloride internal solution
(ECl–= −90 mV) and holding the cell at
−40 mV, which is near the midpoint between ECl– and
EK+/Na+. Notably, the average shape of sIPSCs
recorded in hSS displayed a prolonged decay as compared to the average EPSCs
recorded from hCS, as is commonly observed in cortical neurons[55] (Extended Data Fig. 4b).Data were collected using a 1550A digitizer (Molecular Devices), a 700B
patch-clamp amplifier (Molecular Devices) and acquired with the pClamp 10.6
software (Molecular Devices). Recordings were filtered at 10 kHz. Synaptic
recordings were analyzed using custom software developed by J.R.H. (Wdetecta).
Action potentials were analyzed using custom MATLAB (MathWorks) programs. IPSCs
and EPSCs were detected based on their direction and shape. We calculated the
first time derivative of the current recording and set a detection threshold
that was above the noise for each trace. Detected responses were then evaluated
to confirm the detection accuracy.
Statistics
Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. unless
otherwise indicated. Distribution of the raw data was tested for normality of
distribution; statistical analyses were performed using the Student’s
t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, χ2-test, or
ANOVA with posthoc tests as indicated. Sample sizes were estimated empirically
or based on power calculations. Blinding was used for all analyses comparing
patients and control samples.
Immunostaining of hSS in cryosections showing PV neurons
Two anti–PV antibodies have been used to validate
specificity; co-localization with the neuronal marker DCX (day 209).
Single cell gene expression of hCS and hSS at day 105 of differentiation
(n= 11,838 cells; BD Resolve system)
(a) Distribution of expression of the neuronal marker
STMN2, (b) the progenitor marker VIM
and of (c) a set of genes associated with the M cell cycle phase
(AURKB, TPX2, UBE2C,
HMMR, TOP2A, CCNB1,
NUSAP1, NUF2, CDC6,
HIST1H4C, BIRC5,
CKS2). (d) Boxplots for genes enriched in each t-SNE
cluster shown in Fig. 1j.
(e–l) Top 25 genes in each of the 8 clusters shown in Fig. 1j (proportion of molecules per
cells). (m) Scatter plot showing the number of genes detected versus the
number of useful reads.
Characterization of hSS differentiation conditions
(a) Schematic illustrating the differentiation conditions for
deriving hCS or hSS: IS, ISA and and ISRA. (b) Representative traces of
intracellular calcium measurements (Fluo-4) demonstrating spontaneous
activity in hSS at ~day 50 of differentiation. (c) Average calcium
spike frequency in 3 distinct hSS differentiation conditions: IS (n=
114 cells), ISA (n= 327 cells), ISRA (n= 136 cells); cells
derived from 3 hiPSC lines; one-way ANOVA, F(3, 719)= 5.86,
***P< 0.001. (d) Gene expression (qPCR,
normalized to GAPDH) showing down-regulation of
OCT4 and the lack of mesoderm (BRACH)
and endoderm (SOX17) markers following differentiation of
hiPSC into hCS and hSS conditions. (e) Gene expression (qPCR, fold change
versus hiPSC and normalized to GAPDH) showing upregulation
of forebrain markers (SIX3, FOXG1) but not
midbrain (LMX1B), hypothalamus (RAX1) or
spinal cord (HOXB4) markers. (f) Expression of ventral
forebrain genes in hSS and hCS (qPCR, normalized to GAPDH)
at day 25. (g) Average percentage of the proportion of NKX2–1 by
immunostaining in dissociated hCS or hSS at day 25. (h) Expression of
ventral forebrain genes in hSS (qPCR, normalized to GAPDH)
at day 60. (i) Expression of glutamatergic, GABAergic, dopaminergic and
cholinergic neurotransmitter identify genes in hSS (qPCR, normalized to
GAPDH) at day 60. (j) Average percentage of the
proportion of MAP2/Hoechst and GAD67/MAP2 by immunostaining in dissociated
hSS at day 60. (k, l) Expression of interneuron subtypes genes and markers
associated with interneuron migration in hSS (qPCR, normalized to
GAPDH) at day 60. Number of lines hiPSC used indicated
on each column. Data are mean ± s.e.m.
Electrophysiological recordings of hCS and hSS
(a) Representative EPSC traces of recordings from hCS neurons
(sliced preparation) before (black) and during (green) exposure to the
glutamate receptor blocker kynurenic acid (1 mM) (Mann-Whitney U-test,
**P= 0.007). (b) Overlap of averaged EPSCs (red)
recorded in hCS neurons (n= 6 cells) and averaged IPSCs (black)
recorded in hSS (n= 5 cells). Data are
mean ± s.d.
Migration of Dlxi1/2::eGFP+ cells in fused
hSS-hCS
(a, b) Representative immunostaining in cryosections of hSS showing
co-expression of Dlxi1/2::eGFP and GAD67 and GABA. (c) Quantification by
immunostaining of the proportion of Dlxi1/2::eGFP+ cells
that co-express GAD67 in hSS derived using the ISA or ISRA condition
(n= 3 hiPSC lines; t-test, P= 0.35). (d) Proportion of
Dlxi1/2::eGFP and GAD67 positive cells in hSS derived using the ISA or ISRA
condition that co-express SST (t-test, P= 0.48), CR (t-test,
*P= 0.04) or CB (t-test, P= 0.43); n = 3
hiPSC lines. (e) Representative images of hSS-hCS at day 60 showing
migration of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells (from fluorescently
labeled hSS) in fused hSS-hCS but not in hSS-hSS over time. (f) The number
of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ (hSS-derived) or hSYN1::mCherry cells
(hCS-derived) that moved in hSS-hCS or hSS-hSS was quantified in snapshots
of live, intact spheroids at different time points (from day 3 to 25). The
values shown are absolute number of cells that migrated to the other side
(approximately the same area and thickness was imaged in each session);
one-way ANOVA for cells at 17 days after assembly; F(2, 32)= 8.24,
P= 0.001. (g) Representative images of fused hSS-hCS at day 91
showing migration of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells (from
fluorescently labeled hSS) into fused hSS-hCS. (h) Representative image of
an hSS that was plated on a glass coverslip and cultured for ~7
days. (i) Percentage of Dlxi1/2::eGFP inside the coverslip-plated hSS, in
the rim (0–200 μm) or beyond this region (> 200
μm). (j) Quantification of the number of saltations of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells (n= 32 cells) inside
the one-week coverslip-plated hSS, in the rim and outside this region
(one-way ANOVA, interaction F (2, 30)= 22.12, P< 0.001;
Bonferroni post-hoc ***P< 0.0001). (k)
Diagram showing the angle of movement of migrating
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells at 8–9 days after
assembly of hSS-hCS. The angle was calculated between the leading process of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells that have moved into hCS and
the fusion interface (n= 92 cells from 5 hiPSC lines). (l) Histogram
showing the distribution of the distance of migrated
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells relative to the edge of hCS in
hSS-hCS at 30–50 days after assembly. The distance was measured in
fixed 18 μm cryosections (n= 73 cells from 2 hiPSC lines).
(m, n, o) Representative examples of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+
cells migrated in the hCS that moved within a VZ-like region. The VZ-like
region contains GFAP-expressing cells, is surrounded by
TBR1+ cells and the migrated cells show GABA
expression. Supplementary
Video 2 shows movement of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+
cells that is reminiscent of the ventricular-directed migration described in
rodents.
Single cell gene expression of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells
in hSS and hCS (Smart-seq2)
(a) Scheme showing the isolation by dissociation and
fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells from hSS or hCS for single cell
transcriptional analysis. (b) Violin plots showing expression in
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells of selected genes associated
with cortical, striatal and olfactory interneurons in hSS (light green,
n= 123 cells) or hCS (dark green; n= 106 cells) at 2 weeks
after assembly of hSS-hCS. (c) Violin plots showing expression in
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells (at 4 weeks after assembly of
hSS-hCS) in clusters A, B, and C (likelihood ratio test;
GAD1, CELF4: P> 0.05;
PBX3: P< e−7 for A versus B
& C; NNAT: P< e−16 for C
versus A & B, P< e−16 for B versus A
& C; MALAT1: P< e−9 for
C versus A & B; SOX11: P<
e−16 for B versus A & C, P<
e−9 for A versus B & C;
GRIP2: P< e−8 for B versus A
& C). (d) Scatter plot showing the number of genes detected
(≥ 10 reads cutoff) versus the number of reads (n= 410 cells
from combined single cell RNA-seq experiments after 2 weeks or 4 weeks of
assembly in hSS-hCS). (e) Graph illustrating biologically variable
transcripts (red circles) and non-variable transcripts (black circles) along
with the technical noise from the ERCC spike in RNAs (blue dots). Green line
shows the technical noise fit.
Immunocytochemistry and pharmacology in fused hSS-hCS
(a, b, c, d) Representative images of immunostainings for SST,
GAD67, GABA, CR, CB in Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells after
migration in fused hSS-hCS. (e) Scheme illustrating the pharmacological
manipulation of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells that are migrating
in hSS-hCS. (f, g, h, i) Quantification of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cell migration before and after
exposure to 100 nM of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 (n= 8 cells from
2 hiPSC lines; paired t-tests, *P= 0.03 for number of
saltations, **P= 0.006 for saltation length,
**P= 0.006 for speed when mobile,
*P= 0.02 for path directness). (j) Plot illustrating the
trajectory of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in fused hSS-hCS
before and after exposure to AMD3100. Data are
mean ± s.e.m.
Migration of Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP cells in mouse and human forebrain brain
slices versus hSS-hCS
(a, b, c) Representative images of human fetal cortex at GW20
showing immunostaining with antibodies against GFAP, BCL11B (CTIP2) and
GABA. (d) Representative image showing cell labeling with the
Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP reporter in human forebrain at GW18 (6 days after lentivirus
infection) (e, f) Representative immunostainings in cryosections of human
tissue at GW18 showing co-localization of Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP with NKX2-1 and
GABA. (g) Representative images showing cell labeling with the
Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP reporter in hSS-hCS (9 days after assembly), in human
forebrain (GW18) and in mouse slice cultures (E18). (h, i) Comparison of
Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP+ cell size and quantification of the
ratio of soma diameter to the length of the leading process in fused hSS-hCS
(n= 25 cells from 4 hiPSC lines), human forebrain at GW18
(n= 19 cells; black) and GW20 (n= 15 cells; gray),
hSS-derived cells cultured on E14 mouse forebrain slices (n= 14
cells), and E18 mouse forebrain slices (n= 30 cells from 2 litters)
(one-way ANOVA, interaction F(3, 97)= 11.61, P= 0.001,
Bonferroni post-hoc ***P< 0.001,
**P< 0.05). (j, k, l) Comparison of the number of
saltations (n= 56 cells from 2 hiPSC lines; one-way ANOVA,
interaction F(2, 103)= 29.27, P= 0.001, Bonferroni post-hoc
***P< 0.001), saltation length (n=
44 cells from 3 hiPSC lines; one-way ANOVA, interaction F(2, 91)=
3.0, P= 0.50), speed when mobile (n= 38 cells from 3 hiPSC
lines; one-way ANOVA, interaction F(2, 83)= 11.38, P= 0.001,
Bonferroni post-hoc ***P< 0.001) for
Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP+ in fused hSS-hCS, human fetal
forebrain (GW18: n= 19 cells; GW20: n= 15 cells), and E18
mouse forebrain slices (n= 14 cells for saltation length and speed,
n= 16 cells for number of saltations from 2 litters). Data are
mean ± s.e.m.
Derivation of TS hSS, migration and electroporation
(a) Sequencing of PCR-amplified DNA showing the p.G406R mutation in
exon 8a of CACNA1C in TS (subject: 8303). (b)
Representative images of hiPSC colonies expressing pluripotency markers
(OCT4, SSEA4) in one TS subject (c) Level of gene expression (RT-qPCR,
normalized to GAPDH) for NKX2-1 showing no
defects in ventral forebrain induction in TS (two-way ANOVA; interaction
F(2,15)= 0.20, P= 0.81; TS versus Ctrl F(1,15)=
0.16, P= 0.68). (d–g) Representative immunostainings in
cryosections of TS hSS (day 60) showing expression of NKX2-1, GABA, MAP2,
GAD67, SST and CR. (h) Calcium imaging (Fura-2) in dissociated hCS derived
from TS subjects and controls (Ctrl: n= 81 cells from 2 subjects;
TS: n= 147 cells from 2 subjects). Quantification of residual
intracellular calcium
([Ca2+]i) following 67 mM KCl
depolarization of Ctrl and TS cells in hCS cells. Residual
[Ca2+]i was calculated by
dividing the plateau calcium (C–A) level by the peak calcium
elevation (B−A); (t-test, ***P<
0.001). (i) Quantification of
[Ca2+]i following
depolarization of Ctrl and TS cells in hSS (t-test,
***P< 0.001). (j) Representative image of
fused TS hSS-hCS showing Dlxi1/2b::eGFP expression and migration. (k, l)
Quantification of the number of saltations and saltation length of
Dlx2i1/2b::eGFP cells in fused hSS-hCS across multiple Ctrl and TS lines
(related to Fig. 3d, e). (m)
Quantification of the speed when mobile of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP cells in fused
hSS-hCS (Ctrl: n= 21 cells from 3 hiPSC lines derived from 3
subjects; TS: n= 29 cells from 3 hiPSC lines derived from 3
subjects; TS-Ctrl hybrid: n= 12 cells from 3 hiPSC line shown
combinations; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test;
***P< 0.001). (n) Electroporation of cDNA
encoding the TS– and WT– CaV1.2 channels into
slices of mouse E14 ganglionic eminences (GE). (o) Representative example of
time-lapse live imaging depicting the saltatory migration of
GFP+ cells in slices electroporated with CAG::GFP and
either the WT–or the TS– CACNA1C. (p, q)
Quantification of the number of saltations (t-test;
**P< 0.01) and saltation length (t-test;
***P< 0.001) of GFP+
cells in electroporated mouse forebrain slices (WT: n= 33 cells; TS:
n= 23 cells; from 3 litters). (r) Scheme illustrating
pharmacological manipulation of LTCC during live imaging of fused hSS-hCS.
(s) Quantification of speed when mobile following exposure to the LTCC
blocker nimodipine (5 μM) (paired t-test; Ctrl: n= 13 cells
from 3 hiPSC lines derived from 3 subjects,
***P< 0.001; TS: n= 12 cells from 2
hiPSC lines derived from 2 subjects, **P< 0.005).
(t) Quantification of saltation length following exposure to roscovitine (15
μM) (paired t-test; Ctrl: n= 7 cells from 2 hiPSC lines
derived from 2 subject, **P< 0.005; TS: n=
12 cells from 2 hiPSC lines derived from 2 subjects;
***P< 0.001). (u) Quantification of speed
when mobile following exposure to roscovitine (15 μM) (paired
t-tests; Ctrl: n= 9 cells from 2 hiPSC lines derived from 2
subjects, ***P< 0.001; TS: n= 12
cells from 2 hiPSC lines derived from 2 subjects; P= 0.05). Data are
mean ± s.e.m.
Characterization of Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells after
migration
(a) Representative images of 3D–reconstructed
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cell morphologies before and after
migration from hSS into hCS. (b) Quantification of dendritic branching of
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in hSS (n= 58 cells)
and in hCS (n= 55 cells) of fused hSS-hCS (two-way ANOVA;
interaction F(2, 129)= 11.29, P< 0.001; Bonferroni post-hoc
*P< 0.05, ***P< 0.001). (c)
Representative examples of action potentials (slice recordings) in
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in unfused hSS, in hSS of fused
hSS-hCS and in hCS after migration in fused hSS-hCS. (d) AT showing
expression of the GABAergic synapse marker GPHN (green) colocalized with
SYN1 (red) in hCS of fused hSS-hCS but not in unfused hCS; the glutamatergic
marker PSD95 (cyan) colocalized with SYN1 is found in both fused and unfused
hCS (equal volumes 1.2 μm deep). (e) AT of a
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ synapse illustrating the
colocalization with SYN1 (red), GPHN (cyan), and VGAT (white); 5 consecutive
70 nm sections (3 × 3 μm). (f) Representative examples of
whole-cell voltage clamp recordings of IPSCs and EPSCs from
Dlxi1/2b::eGFP+ cells in unfused hSS, in fused
hCS-hSS, or after migration in hCS (g) Representative examples of whole-cell
voltage clamp recordings of IPSCs and EPSCs in cells recorded from unfused
hCS cells and fused hCS cells. (h) Electrical stimulation and patch clamp
recording in fused hSS-hCS showing evoked EPSCs and IPSCs before (black) and
after exposure to 10 μM gabazine (red). (i) Average peri-stimulus
synaptic events (IPSCs and EPSCs) in Dlxi1/2::eGFP+ cells
recorded in the hCS side of fused hSS-hCS before and after electrical
stimulation (paired t-test, *P< 0.05). Data are
mean ± s.e.m.
Authors: Xuyu Qian; Ha Nam Nguyen; Mingxi M Song; Christopher Hadiono; Sarah C Ogden; Christy Hammack; Bing Yao; Gregory R Hamersky; Fadi Jacob; Chun Zhong; Ki-Jun Yoon; William Jeang; Li Lin; Yujing Li; Jai Thakor; Daniel A Berg; Ce Zhang; Eunchai Kang; Michael Chickering; David Nauen; Cheng-Ying Ho; Zhexing Wen; Kimberly M Christian; Pei-Yong Shi; Brady J Maher; Hao Wu; Peng Jin; Hengli Tang; Hongjun Song; Guo-Li Ming Journal: Cell Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: A R Mardinly; I Spiegel; A Patrizi; E Centofante; J E Bazinet; C P Tzeng; C Mandel-Brehm; D A Harmin; H Adesnik; M Fagiolini; M E Greenberg Journal: Nature Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yishan Sun; Sergiu P Paşca; Thomas Portmann; Carleton Goold; Kathleen A Worringer; Wendy Guan; Karen C Chan; Hui Gai; Daniel Vogt; Ying-Jiun J Chen; Rong Mao; Karrie Chan; John Lr Rubenstein; Daniel V Madison; Joachim Hallmayer; Wendy M Froehlich-Santino; Jonathan A Bernstein; Ricardo E Dolmetsch Journal: Elife Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 8.140