Literature DB >> 27146365

3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers.

Sidra Waheed1, Joan M Cabot1, Niall P Macdonald1, Trevor Lewis2, Rosanne M Guijt3, Brett Paull1, Michael C Breadmore1.   

Abstract

3D printing has the potential to significantly change the field of microfluidics. The ability to fabricate a complete microfluidic device in a single step from a computer model has obvious attractions, but it is the ability to create truly three dimensional structures that will provide new microfluidic capability that is challenging, if not impossible to make with existing approaches. This critical review covers the current state of 3D printing for microfluidics, focusing on the four most frequently used printing approaches: inkjet (i3DP), stereolithography (SLA), two photon polymerisation (2PP) and extrusion printing (focusing on fused deposition modeling). It discusses current achievements and limitations, and opportunities for advancement to reach 3D printing's full potential.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146365     DOI: 10.1039/c6lc00284f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  157 in total

1.  Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Particle movement and fluid behavior visualization using an optically transparent 3D-printed micro-hydrocyclone.

Authors:  Maira Shakeel Syed; Fateme Mirakhorli; Christopher Marquis; Robert A Taylor; Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Optimization of smartphone-based on-site-capable uranium analysis in water using a 3D printed microdevice.

Authors:  Kolsoum Dalvand; Sepideh Keshan Balavandy; Feng Li; Michael Breadmore; Alireza Ghiasvand
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Custom 3D printer and resin for 18 μm × 20 μm microfluidic flow channels.

Authors:  Hua Gong; Bryce P Bickham; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Accessible Telemedicine Diagnostics with ELISA in a 3D Printed Pipette Tip.

Authors:  Mohamed Sharafeldin; Karteek Kadimisetty; Ketki R Bhalerao; Itti Bist; Abby Jones; Tianqi Chen; Norman H Lee; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  3D-printed miniaturized fluidic tools in chemistry and biology.

Authors:  C K Dixit; K Kadimisetty; J Rusling
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 12.296

7.  3D-printed Quake-style microvalves and micropumps.

Authors:  Yuan-Sheng Lee; Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Microchip Electrophoresis of Preterm Birth Biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Anna V Nielsen; Hua Gong; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  FDM 3D Printing of High-Pressure, Heat-Resistant, Transparent Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  Valentin Romanov; Raheel Samuel; Marzieh Chaharlang; Alexander R Jafek; Adam Frost; Bruce K Gale
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Biocompatible PEGDA Resin for 3D Printing.

Authors:  Chandler Warr; Jonard Corpuz Valdoz; Bryce P Bickham; Connor J Knight; Nicholas A Franks; Nicholas Chartrand; Pam M Van Ry; Kenneth A Christensen; Gregory P Nordin; Alonzo D Cook
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2020-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.