Literature DB >> 26364512

Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients.

Aarno Dietz1, Michael Buschermöhle2,3, Ville Sivonen4, Tytti Willberg1, Antti A Aarnisalo4, Thomas Lenarz3,5, Birger Kollmeier2,3,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The first Finnish sentence-based speech test in noise--the Finnish matrix sentence test--was recently developed. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of the new test with respect to test-retest reliability, speech recognition curve, and international comparability in Finnish cochlear implant (CI) recipients.
DESIGN: The speech reception thresholds (SRT) were measured by means of an adaptive test procedure and compared with the results of the traditional Finnish word test. Additional measurements for concurrent slope and SRT estimation were conducted to determine the speech recognition curve and to check the test-retest reliability. STUDY SAMPLE: The measurements were performed on 78 Finnish CI recipients. In a subset of 25 patients, additional measurements for test-retest reliability and slope determination were performed.
RESULTS: The mean SRT was -3.5 ± 1.7 dB SNR, with only a weak correlation with the Finnish word test. Test-retest reliability was within ± 1 dB and the mean slope of the speech recognition curve was 14.6 ± 3.6 %/dB. The rehabilitation results were similar to the results published for the German matrix test.
CONCLUSIONS: The Finnish matrix test was found to be suitable and efficient in CI recipients with similar characteristics as the German matrix test.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; noise; psychoacoustics/hearing science; speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26364512     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1070309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  5 in total

1.  [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].

Authors:  T Memmeler; R Schönweiler; B Wollenberg; J Löhler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Characteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests].

Authors:  T Brand; K C Wagener
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Use of Auditory Training and Its Influence on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Priyanka Reddy; Cheng Ma; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  The Effectiveness of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation on Performance-Based and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Finnish Recipients.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Antje Heinrich; Timo Törmäkangas; Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Petrus Miettinen; Tytti Willberg; Pia H Linder
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.152

5.  Improvements in Hearing and in Quality of Life after Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in a Consecutive Sample of Adult Patients with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Ville Sivonen; Saku T Sinkkonen; Tytti Willberg; Satu Lamminmäki; Hilkka Jääskelä-Saari; Antti A Aarnisalo; Aarno Dietz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.