Literature DB >> 31789794

Duration of Processor Use Per Day Is Significantly Correlated With Speech Recognition Abilities in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Jourdan T Holder1, Nichole C Dwyer, René H Gifford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Quantify the relationship between average hours of processor use per day and measures of speech recognition in post-lingually deafened adults with cochlear implants.
SETTING: Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Three hundred adult (mean age = 64, 130 women) CI users were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation analyses were completed for CI-aided speech recognition (Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant [CNC] monosyllables and AzBio sentences) at approximately 12 months post-implantation and average hours of processor use per day, which was extracted from the CI programming software.
RESULTS: Average processor use was 10.2 hours per day (range, 0.1-22.7), and average speech recognition scores were 49.9 and 61.7% for CNC and AzBio sentence recognition, respectively. We found a strong, significant correlation between hours of processor use per day and consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition (rs = 0.61, p < 0.0001) and AzBio sentence recognition (rs = 0.56, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that highest speech recognition outcomes are correlated with greater than 10 hours of CI use per day. Further research is needed to assess the causal link between daily CI use and speech recognition abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31789794      PMCID: PMC6954337          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.619


  27 in total

1.  Talking to children matters: early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary.

Authors:  Adriana Weisleder; Anne Fernald
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-09-10

2.  Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults.

Authors:  K M J Green; Y M Bhatt; D J Mawman; M P O'Driscoll; S R Saeed; R T Ramsden; M W Green
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2007-03

3.  Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jon K Shallop; Anna Mary Peterson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates.

Authors:  Janice Leung; Nae-Yuh Wang; Jennifer D Yeagle; Jill Chinnici; Stephen Bowditch; Howard W Francis; John K Niparko
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-12

5.  Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Leonid M Litvak; Susan Van Wie; Rene H Gifford; Philipos C Loizou; Louise M Loiselle; Tyler Oakes; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli; Carol Sammeth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Impact of Consistency in Daily Device Use on Speech Perception Abilities in Children with Cochlear Implants: Datalogging Evidence.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Joseph Sanfilippo; Blake Papsin; Karen Gordon
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Evaluation of Outcome Variability Associated With Lateral Wall, Mid-scalar, and Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays When Controlling for Preoperative Patient Characteristics.

Authors:  Joshua E Fabie; Robert G Keller; Jonathan L Hatch; Meredith A Holcomb; Elizabeth L Camposeo; Paul R Lambert; Ted A Meyer; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  12 in total

1.  Use of Auditory Training and Its Influence on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Priyanka Reddy; Cheng Ma; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  The Cochlear Implant Use Questionnaire: Assessing Habits and Barriers to Use.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Lindsay S Mayberry; René Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  HiRes Ultra Series Recall: Failure Rates and Revision Speech Recognition Outcomes.

Authors:  Nathan R Lindquist; Nathan D Cass; Ankita Patro; Elizabeth L Perkins; René H Gifford; David S Haynes; Jourdan T Holder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

4.  Effect of Increased Daily Cochlear Implant Use on Auditory Perception in Adults.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Further Evidence for Individual Ear Consideration in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation.

Authors:  Ankita Patro; Nathan R Lindquist; Jourdan T Holder; Kareem O Tawfik; Matthew R O'Malley; Marc L Bennett; David S Haynes; René Gifford; Elizabeth L Perkins
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.619

6.  Cochlear implantation performance outcomes in patients over 80 years old.

Authors:  Helena Wichova; Dawna Mills; Sarah Beatty; Kevin Peng; Mia Miller
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 7.  Expansion of Audiologic Criteria for Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Christine Brown; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.866

8.  Cochlear Implantation in Cases of Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Subjective Benefit, Word Recognition, and Spatial Hearing.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Sarah A McCarthy; Andrea L Bucker; Ellen J Deres; Margaret E Richter; Nicholas J Thompson; Michael W Canfarotta; Brendan P O'Connell; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Comprehensive auditory rehabilitation in adults receiving cochlear implants: A pilot study.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Kara Vasil; Jodi Baxter; Brett Klamer; David Kline; Christin Ray
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-01

10.  Further Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria.

Authors:  Elizabeth Perkins; Mary S Dietrich; Nauman Manzoor; Matthew O'Malley; Marc Bennett; Alejandro Rivas; David Haynes; Robert Labadie; René Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.