Literature DB >> 14663353

Residual speech perception and cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults.

Nahla A Gomaa1, Jay T Rubinstein, Mary W Lowder, Richard S Tyler, Bruce J Gantz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at testing the post-hoc validity of the previously reported predictive index for postoperative cochlear implant performance, based on preoperative duration of deafness, and speech reception. STUDY
DESIGN: Adult patients with postlingual severe to profound hearing loss, who were implanted with Cochlear Corporation CI-22 and CI-24 devices were included in this study. We studied the relationship between their postoperative word recognition scores and preoperative factors, namely, duration of deafness, and sentence recognition. We used the same predictive index reported in the previous study to predict their postoperative scores and test the model's agreement with the actual performance.
RESULTS: We found that postoperative performance as measured by CNC word scores had an inverse relationship with the duration of deafness, and a direct correlation with the preoperative performance on CID sentence recognition tests. A nonlinear term [Duration / (1+CID)] was shown to improve the correlation coefficient of our predictive index.
CONCLUSION: Some predictability of cochlear implant outcome is possible depending on the preoperative duration of deafness and speech recognition abilities. Preoperative residual speech recognition acts as a "trophic factor" that protects the spiral ganglion and/ or the central auditory pathways from degeneration. In other words, it improves the expected postoperative word scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14663353     DOI: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000100208.26628.2D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  29 in total

1.  Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Jeon; Christopher W Turner; Sue A Karsten; Belinda A Henry; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Predicting the effect of post-implant cochlear fibrosis on residual hearing.

Authors:  Chul-Hee Choi; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sheetal Desai; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  p75(NTR) expression and nuclear localization of p75(NTR) intracellular domain in spiral ganglion Schwann cells following deafness correlate with cell proliferation.

Authors:  Matthew J Provenzano; Sarah A Minner; Kaitlin Zander; J Jason Clark; Catherine J Kane; Steven H Green; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 4.314

5.  The influence of various factors on the performance of repetition tests in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Il Joon Moon; Eun Yeon Kim; Jin Ok Jeong; Won-Ho Chung; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Cochlear implant rehabilitation in older adults: literature review and proposal of a conceptual framework.

Authors:  James H Clark; Jennifer Yeagle; Alicia I Arbaje; Frank R Lin; John K Niparko; Howard W Francis
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Musical pitch and lexical tone perception with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Wuqing Wang; Ning Zhou; Li Xu
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Influence of cAMP and protein kinase A on neurite length from spiral ganglion neurons.

Authors:  Ningyong Xu; Jonathan Engbers; Sobia Khaja; Linjing Xu; J Jason Clark; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Xin Yang; Jason Parton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.