Literature DB >> 25335975

Virtual electrodes by current steering in retinal prostheses.

Gerald Dumm1, James B Fallon2, Chris E Williams2, Mohit N Shivdasani2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Retinal prostheses are an approved treatment for vision restoration in retinal degenerative diseases; however, present implants have limited resolution and simply increasing the number of electrodes is limited by design issues. In cochlear implants, virtual electrodes can be created by simultaneous stimulation of adjacent physical electrodes (current steering). The present study assessed whether this type of current steering can be adapted for retinal implants.
METHODS: Suprachoroidal electrode arrays were implanted in four normally sighted cat eyes. Electrode pairs were driven simultaneously at different current levels and current ratios. Multiunit spiking activity in the visual cortex was recorded. Spike distribution across channels enabled generation of cortical activation maps and calculation of centroid positions. For each current configuration, centroid shifts between two virtual electrodes were compared to shifts obtained from physical electrode stimulation.
RESULTS: Using current steering, virtual electrodes with different cortical activation maps could be created. Cortical centroids were found to shift as a function of the current ratio used for virtual electrodes and were similar to the centroid shifts seen when using physical electrodes. In addition, the cortical response to stimulation of a physical electrode could be reproduced by applying current steering to electrodes on either side of the physical electrode.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that current steering can alter activation patterns in the visual cortex and could enhance visual perception in retinal implants by eliciting phosphene percepts intermediate between those elicited by physical electrodes. These results inform development of new electrode arrays that can take advantage of current steering. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  current steering; electrophysiology; resolution; retinal implant; visual cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25335975     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  13 in total

1.  neuroBi: A Highly Configurable Neurostimulator for a Retinal Prosthesis and Other Applications.

Authors:  Kyle D Slater; Nicholas C Sinclair; Timothy S Nelson; Peter J Blamey; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.316

2.  Epiretinal stimulation with local returns enhances selectivity at cellular resolution.

Authors:  Victoria H Fan; Lauren E Grosberg; Sasidhar S Madugula; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Theoretical Optimization of Stimulation Strategies for a Directionally Segmented Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Array.

Authors:  YiZi Xiao; Edgar Peña; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 4.  Neurophysiological considerations for visual implants.

Authors:  Sabrina J Meikle; Yan T Wong
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Spatially patterned bi-electrode epiretinal stimulation for axon avoidance at cellular resolution.

Authors:  Ramandeep S Vilkhu; Sasidhar S Madugula; Lauren E Grosberg; Alex R Gogliettino; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; Subhasish Mitra; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Caravaca-Rodriguez; Susana P Gaytan; Gregg J Suaning; Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

7.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Dynamic Stimulation of Visual Cortex Produces Form Vision in Sighted and Blind Humans.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Denise Oswalt; Ping Sun; Brett L Foster; John F Magnotti; Soroush Niketeghad; Nader Pouratian; William H Bosking; Daniel Yoshor
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Temporal properties of inferior colliculus neurons to photonic stimulation in the cochlea.

Authors:  Xiaodong Tan; Hunter Young; Agnella Izzo Matic; Whitney Zirkle; Suhrud Rajguru; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-08

10.  Model-Based Comparison of Deep Brain Stimulation Array Functionality with Varying Number of Radial Electrodes and Machine Learning Feature Sets.

Authors:  Benjamin A Teplitzky; Laura M Zitella; YiZi Xiao; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.