Literature DB >> 24970753

Cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) improves motor unit recruitment in healthy subjects.

Tommaso Bocci1, Beatrice Vannini2, Antonio Torzini3, Andrea Mazzatenta4, Maurizio Vergari5, Filippo Cogiamanian5, Alberto Priori5, Ferdinando Sartucci6.   

Abstract

Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a new promising technique for modulating spinal cord function in humans. However, its effects on corticospinal pathways and lower motorneuron excitability are poorly understood. We studied the effects of tsDCS on motor unit recruitment by evaluating changes in motor unit number (MUNE) and peripheral silent period (PSP) after sham (s-tsDCS), anodal (a-tsDCS) and cathodal (c-tsDCS) tsDCS applied either over the cervical or the lower thoracic spinal cord in healthy subjects. For the calculation of MUNE we used the multipoint incremental technique recording from either the ulnar nerve innervated abductor digiti minimi (ADM) or the median nerve innervated abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle. c-tsDCS dramatically increases MUNE values following cervical polarization, while sham and anodal polarization have no significant effect (APB: F(4,99)=26.4, p<0.001, two-way repeated measures ANOVA with "time" and "stimulation" as factors; ADM: F(4,99)=22.1, p<0.0001). At the same time, c-tsDCS dampened PSP respect to sham and anodal conditions (p<0.0001). Interestingly, also thoracic c-tsDCS significantly improved motor unit recruitment compared with both s-tsDCS and a-tsDCS (APB: F(4,99)=20.1, p<0.0001; ADM: F(4,99)=16.6, p<0.0001). Our data in healthy subjects suggest that tsDCS, possibly also through supraspinal effects, could provide a novel therapeutic tool in managing several pathological conditions characterized by reduced motor unit recruitment, such as stroke and spinal cord injuries.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor system; Motor unit number estimation; Motor unit recruitment; Motorneuron excitability; Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation; tsDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24970753     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  25 in total

1.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Sara Marceglia; Maurizio Vergari; Valeria Cognetto; Filippo Cogiamanian; Ferdinando Sartucci; Alberto Priori
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Repeated cathodal transspinal pulse and direct current stimulation modulate cortical and corticospinal excitability differently in healthy humans.

Authors:  Lynda M Murray; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Does trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulate the Hoffmann reflexes of healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysisc.

Authors:  Plínio Luna Albuquerque; Thyciane Mendonça; Mayara Campêlo; Lívia Shirahige; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation improves locomotor learning in healthy humans.

Authors:  Oluwole O Awosika; Marco Sandrini; Rita Volochayev; Ryan M Thompson; Nathan Fishman; Tianxia Wu; Mary Kay Floeter; Mark Hallett; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  The effect of cathodal transspinal direct current stimulation on tibialis anterior stretch reflex components in humans.

Authors:  Eva Rudjord Therkildsen; Jens Bo Nielsen; Mikkel Malling Beck; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Jakob Lorentzen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Combining Robot-Assisted Gait Training and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Federica Bressi; Alex Martino Cinnera; Giovanni Morone; Benedetta Campagnola; Laura Cricenti; Fabio Santacaterina; Sandra Miccinilli; Loredana Zollo; Stefano Paolucci; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Silvia Sterzi; Marco Bravi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Anodal Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) Selectively Inhibits the Synaptic Efficacy of Nociceptive Transmission at Spinal Cord Level.

Authors:  Cédric Lenoir; Aleksandar Jankovski; André Mouraux
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 9.  Paired Stimulation to Promote Lasting Augmentation of Corticospinal Circuits.

Authors:  Noam Y Harel; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-10-09       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 10.  Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.