Literature DB >> 21159430

Transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation inhibits the lower limb nociceptive flexion reflex in human beings.

Filippo Cogiamanian1, Maurizio Vergari, Elena Schiaffi, Sara Marceglia, Gianluca Ardolino, Sergio Barbieri, Alberto Priori.   

Abstract

Aiming at developing a new, noninvasive approach to spinal cord neuromodulation, we evaluated whether transcutaneous direct current (DC) stimulation induces long-lasting changes in the central pain pathways in human beings. A double-blind crossover design was used to investigate the effects of anodal direct current (2mA, 15min) applied on the skin overlying the thoracic spinal cord on the lower-limb flexion reflex in a group of 11 healthy volunteers. To investigate whether transcutaneous spinal cord DC stimulation (tsDCS) acts indirectly on the nociceptive reflex by modulating excitability in mono-oligosynaptic segmental reflex pathways, we also evaluated the H-reflex size from soleus muscle after tibial nerve stimulation. In our healthy subjects, anodal thoracic tsDCS reduced the total lower-limb flexion reflex area by 40.25% immediately after stimulation (T0) and by 46.9% 30min after stimulation offset (T30). When we analyzed the 2 lower-limb flexion reflex components (RII tactile and RIII nociceptive) separately, we found that anodal tsDCS induced a significant reduction in RIII area with a slight but not significant effect on RII area. After anodal tsDCS, the RIII area decreased by 27% at T0 and by 28% at T30. Both sham and active tsDCS left all the tested H-reflex variables unchanged. None of our subjects reported adverse effects after active stimulation. These results suggest that tsDCS holds promise as a tool that is complementary or alternative to drugs and invasive spinal cord electrical stimulation for managing pain. Thoracic transcutaneous direct current stimulation induces depression of nociceptive lower limb flexion reflex in human beings that persists after stimulation offset; this form of stimulation holds promise as a tool that is complementary or alternative to drugs and invasive spinal cord electrical stimulation for managing pain. Copyright Â
© 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21159430     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  35 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord stimulation: neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Yun Guan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-06

2.  Effects of cathodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation on mouse spinal network and complex multijoint movements.

Authors:  Zaghloul Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spinal direct current stimulation modulates the activity of gracile nucleus and primary somatosensory cortex in anaesthetized rats.

Authors:  J Aguilar; F Pulecchi; R Dilena; A Oliviero; A Priori; G Foffani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Sara Marceglia; Maurizio Vergari; Valeria Cognetto; Filippo Cogiamanian; Ferdinando Sartucci; Alberto Priori
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.

Authors:  F Bolzoni; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Does trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulate the Hoffmann reflexes of healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysisc.

Authors:  Plínio Luna Albuquerque; Thyciane Mendonça; Mayara Campêlo; Lívia Shirahige; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Evidence for long-lasting subcortical facilitation by transcranial direct current stimulation in the cat.

Authors:  Francesco Bolzoni; Lars-Gunnar Pettersson; Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.