Literature DB >> 34633630

Estimating subjective evaluation of low-contrast resolution using convolutional neural networks.

Yujiro Doi1, Atsushi Teramoto2, Ayumi Yamada3, Masanao Kobayashi3, Kuniaki Saito3, Hiroshi Fujita4.   

Abstract

To develop a convolutional neural network-based method for the subjective evaluation of computed tomography (CT) images having low-contrast resolution due to imaging conditions and nonlinear image processing. Four radiological technologists visually evaluated CT images that were reconstructed using three nonlinear noise reduction processes (AIDR 3D, AIDR 3D Enhanced, AiCE) on a CT system manufactured by CANON. The visual evaluation consisted of two items: low contrast detectability (score: 0-9) and texture pattern (score: 1-5). Four AI models with different convolutional and max pooling layers were constructed and trained on pairs of CANON CT images and average visual assessment scores of four radiological technologists. CANON CT images not used for training were used to evaluate prediction performance. In addition, CT images scanned with a SIEMENS CT system were input to each AI model for external validation. The mean absolute error and correlation coefficients were used as evaluation metrics. Our proposed AI model can evaluate low-contrast detectability and texture patterns with high accuracy, which varies with the dose administered and the nonlinear noise reduction process. The proposed AI model is also expected to be suitable for upcoming reconstruction algorithms that will be released in the future.
© 2021. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Convolutional neural network; Deep learning; Image quality; Subjective evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34633630     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01062-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 2662-4729


  14 in total

1.  Automated OCT angiography image quality assessment using a deep learning algorithm.

Authors:  J L Lauermann; M Treder; M Alnawaiseh; C R Clemens; N Eter; F Alten
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  CT Detectability of Small Low-Contrast Hypoattenuating Focal Lesions: Iterative Reconstructions versus Filtered Back Projection.

Authors:  Achille Mileto; David A Zamora; Adam M Alessio; Carina Pereira; Jin Liu; Puneet Bhargava; Jonathan Carnell; Sophie M Cowan; Manjiri K Dighe; Martin L Gunn; Sooah Kim; Orpheus Kolokythas; Jean H Lee; Jeffrey H Maki; Mariam Moshiri; Ayesha Nasrullah; Ryan B O'Malley; Udo P Schmiedl; Erik V Soloff; Giuseppe V Toia; Carolyn L Wang; Kalpana M Kanal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Feasibility of low-radiation-dose CT for abdominal examinations with hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm: low-contrast phantom study.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kondo; Masamitsu Hatakenaka; Ko Higuchi; Taisuke Fujioka; Takashi Shirasaka; Yasuhiko Nakamura; Katsumasa Nakamura; Takashi Yoshiura; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-01-09

4.  Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Samuel Richard; Daniela B Husarik; Girijesh Yadava; Simon N Murphy; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: technical principles.

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Pim A de Jong; Tim Leiner; Linda M de Heer; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Ricardo P J Budde; Arnold M R Schilham
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Can sinogram-affirmed iterative (SAFIRE) reconstruction improve imaging quality on low-dose lung CT screening compared with traditional filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction?

Authors:  Wen Jie Yang; Fu Hua Yan; Bo Liu; Li Fang Pang; Liang Hou; Huan Zhang; Zi Lai Pan; Ke Min Chen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver.

Authors:  Mark E Baker; Frank Dong; Andrew Primak; Nancy A Obuchowski; David Einstein; Namita Gandhi; Brian R Herts; Andrei Purysko; Erick Remer; Neil Vachhani; Neil Vachani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Jiang Hsieh; Paul E Licato; Synho Do; Homer H Pien; Michael A Blake
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved?

Authors:  Sebastian T Schindera; Devang Odedra; Syed Arsalan Raza; Tae Kyoung Kim; Hyun-Jung Jang; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Patrik Rogalla
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Blind image quality assessment via deep learning.

Authors:  Weilong Hou; Xinbo Gao; Dacheng Tao; Xuelong Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 10.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.