Literature DB >> 31119426

Automated OCT angiography image quality assessment using a deep learning algorithm.

J L Lauermann1, M Treder1, M Alnawaiseh1, C R Clemens1, N Eter1, F Alten2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To expedite and to standardize the process of image quality assessment in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) using a specialized deep learning algorithm (DLA).
METHODS: Two hundred randomly chosen en-face macular OCTA images of the central 3 × 3 mm2 superficial vascular plexus were evaluated retrospectively by an OCTA experienced reader. Images were defined either as sufficient (group 1, n = 100) or insufficient image quality (group 2, n = 100) based on Motion Artifact Score (MAS) and Segmentation Accuracy Score (SAS). Subsequently, a pre-trained multi-layer deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) was trained and validated with 160 of these en-face OCTA scans (group 1: 80; group 2: 80). Training accuracy, validation accuracy, and cross-entropy were computed. The DLA was tested in detecting 40 untrained OCTA images (group 1: 20; group 2: 20). An insufficient image quality probability score (IPS) and a sufficient image quality probability score (SPS) were calculated.
RESULTS: Training accuracy was 97%, validation accuracy 100%, and cross entropy 0.12. A total of 90% (18/20) of the OCTA images with insufficient image quality and 90% (18/20) with sufficient image quality were correctly classified by the DLA. Mean IPS was 0.88 ± 0.21, and mean SPS was 0.84 ± 0.19. Discrimination between both groups was highly significant (p < 0.001). Sensitivity of the DLA was 90.0%, specificity 90.0%, and accuracy 90.0%. Coefficients of variation were 0.96 ± 1.9% (insufficient quality) and 1.14 ± 1.6% (sufficient quality).
CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning (DL) appears to be a potential approach to automatically distinguish between sufficient and insufficient OCTA image quality. DL may contribute to establish image quality standards in this recent imaging modality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Image analysis; Image artifacts; Optical coherence tomography angiography; Retina

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31119426     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04338-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  10 in total

1.  Reconstruction of high-resolution 6×6-mm OCT angiograms using deep learning.

Authors:  Min Gao; Yukun Guo; Tristan T Hormel; Jiande Sun; Thomas S Hwang; Yali Jia
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Estimating subjective evaluation of low-contrast resolution using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Yujiro Doi; Atsushi Teramoto; Ayumi Yamada; Masanao Kobayashi; Kuniaki Saito; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence for improving sickle cell retinopathy diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Sophie Cai; Ian C Han; Adrienne W Scott
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.456

4.  Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Quality Across Three Multicenter Clinical Studies of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Brandon J Lujan; Claire T Calhoun; Adam R Glassman; Joseph M Googe; Lee M Jampol; Michele Melia; Deborah K Schlossman; Jennifer K Sun
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 5.  Towards standardizing retinal optical coherence tomography angiography: a review.

Authors:  Danuta M Sampson; Adam M Dubis; Fred K Chen; Robert J Zawadzki; David D Sampson
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 17.782

6.  Deep learning for quality assessment of optical coherence tomography angiography images.

Authors:  Rahul M Dhodapkar; Emily Li; Kristen Nwanyanwu; Ron Adelman; Smita Krishnaswamy; Jay C Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy: an updated review.

Authors:  Zihan Sun; Dawei Yang; Ziqi Tang; Danny S Ng; Carol Y Cheung
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Automated Quality Assessment and Image Selection of Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography Images through Deep Learning.

Authors:  Henry H Li; Joseph R Abraham; Duriye Damla Sevgi; Sunil K Srivastava; Jenna M Hach; Jon Whitney; Amit Vasanji; Jamie L Reese; Justis P Ehlers
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 9.  Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ana Boned-Murillo; Henar Albertos-Arranz; María Dolores Diaz-Barreda; Elvira Orduna-Hospital; Ana Sánchez-Cano; Antonio Ferreras; Nicolás Cuenca; Isabel Pinilla
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-12-31

10.  Assessment of Artifacts in Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Glaucomatous and Normal Eyes.

Authors:  Weijing Cheng; Yunhe Song; Fengbin Lin; Jian Xiong; Fei Li; Ling Jin; Zhenyu Wang; Chunman Yang; Bin Yang; Fanyin Wang; Guili Ning; Wei Wang; Xiulan Zhang
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.