| Literature DB >> 34526107 |
Agne Laucyte-Cibulskiene1,2, Liam J Ward1, Valeria Raparelli3,4, Karolina Kublickiene5,6, Thomas Ebert1, Giulia Tosti7, Claudia Tucci8, Leah Hernandez1, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer9, Maria-Trinidad Herrero10, Colleen M Norris3,11, Louise Pilote12, Magnus Söderberg13, Torkel B Brismar14,15, Jonaz Ripsweden14,15, Peter Stenvinkel1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sex differences are underappreciated in the current understanding of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in association with chronic kidney disease (CKD). A hallmark of CKD is vascular aging that is characterised, amongst others, by; systemic inflammation, microbiota disbalance, oxidative stress, and vascular calcification-features linked to atherosclerosis/arteriosclerosis development. Thus, it is the necessary to introduce novel biomarkers related to athero-/arteriosclerotic damage for better assessment of vascular ageing in patients CKD. However, little is known about the relationship between uraemia and novel CVD biomarkers, such as growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), cartilage glycoprotein-39 (YKL-40) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). Therefore, we hypothesise that there are sex-specific relationships between GDF-15, YKL-40, MMP-9 levels in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients in relation to gut microbiota, vascular calcification, inflammation, comorbidities, and all-cause mortality.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Calcification; Cardiovascular disease; Chronic kidney disease; End stage kidney disease; TMAO; Uraemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34526107 PMCID: PMC8444580 DOI: 10.1186/s13293-021-00393-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Sex Differ ISSN: 2042-6410 Impact factor: 5.027
Clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics of the end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) study population stratified by sex
| ESKD patients | Female ( | Male ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 55 (42–62) | 54 (42–65) | 0.16 |
| Cardiovascular disease, | 16 (20.3) | 52 (34.4) | |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 14 (17.1) | 43 (28.5) | 0.06 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.8 (21.5–27.7) | 24.3 (22.3–27.7) | 0.35 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 139 (129–152) | 146 (135–160) | |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 82 (74–91) | 85 (78–94) | 0.06 |
| Smoking history, | 10 (12.7) | 14 (9.3) | 0.61 |
| SGA, > 1 | 28 (35.4) | 46 (30.5) | 0.42 |
| Handgrip strength | 20 (17–25) | 32 (25–39) | |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73m2 | 5.5 (4.4–8.3) | 6.3 (5.1–8.3) | 0.07 |
| Medications at cohort entry | |||
| ACEi/ARB, | 47 (59.5) | 120 (79.5) | |
| β-blockers, | 45 (57.0) | 104 (68.9) | 0.07 |
| Ca-blockers, | 47 (59.5) | 94 (62.3) | 0.68 |
| Statins, | 26 (32.9) | 60 (39.7) | 0.31 |
| Biochemicals | |||
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.7 (4.0–5.3) | 4.2 (3.5–4.7) | |
| High-density lipoprotein, mmol/L | 1.5 (1.2–1.8) | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) | |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.6 (1.1–2.2) | 1.5 (1.2–2.0) | 0.79 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, g/L | 1.4 (1.3–1.6) | 1.3 (1.1–1.5) | |
| Apolipoprotein B, g/L | 0.9 (0.7–1.0) | 0.8 (0.7–1.0) | 0.14 |
| Lipoprotein(a), mg/L | 327 (102–848) | 199 (77–563) | 0.18 |
| †Albumin, g/L | 34.0 (4.6) | 34.0 (5.0) | 0.92 |
| Creatinine, µmol/L | 648 (498–817) | 757 (612–922) | |
| †Haemoglobin, g/L | 109 (13) | 107 (12) | 0.24 |
| HbA1c, mmol/mol | 28 (22–34) | 30 (25–39) | 0.15 |
| Biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress, and uraemic dysfunction | |||
| hsCRP, mg/L | 2.1 (0.8–6.9) | 2.3 (1.0–8.9) | 0.65 |
| IL-6, pg/mL | 4.0 (2.3–7.7) | 5.9 (2.6–9.5) | 0.25 |
| TNF, pg/mL | 14.8 (10.9–18.3) | 15.6 (12.1–19.5) | 0.30 |
| 8-OHdG, ng/mL | 0.3 (0.2–0.6) | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | |
| TMAO, μM | 69.0 (37.7–93.9) | 72.6 (48.9–108.0) | 0.21 |
| Biomarkers of interest | |||
| GDF-15, ng/mL | 4.5 (3.6–5.4) | 4.5 (3.4–5.6) | 1.00 |
| MMP-9, ng/mL | 328.7 (208.0–552.1) | 275.8 (168.9–546.1) | 0.44 |
| YKL-40, ng/mL | 120.4 (86.9–173.2) | 114.1 (78.9–187.5) | 0.90 |
| Vessel physiology | |||
| CAC score, AU | 16.5 (0.0–672.0) | 68.5 (0.0–1072.0) | 0.13 |
| CAC score, positive | 25 (59.5), [ | 53 (69.7), [ | 0.26 |
| Media calcification, | 11 (57.9), [ | 33 (84.6), [ | |
| Intimal fibrosis, | 3 (15.8), [ | 14 (35.9), [ | 0.11 |
| Follow-up data | |||
| All-cause mortality, | 7 (8.9) | 21 (13.9) | 0.27 |
Bold signifies statistical significance p < 0.05
Continuous data expressed as median ± quartile range (Q1–Q3), or †Mean ± SD, and statistical comparisons by Mann–Whitney U test and Student’s t-test, dependent on not-normal distributed and †normal distributed data
Nominal data expressed as frequency (%) and statistical comparison by Chi-squared test
ACEi/ARB angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, AVC aortic valve calcification, CAC coronary artery calcification, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, GDF-15 growth differentiation factor-15, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, hsCRP high-sensitive C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin-6, MMP-9 matrix metalloproteinase-9, SGA subjective global assessment, TMAO trimethylamine N-oxide, TNF tumour necrosis factor, YKL-40 40-kDa plasma glycoprotein, 8-OHdG 8-hydroxy-2ʹ-deoxyguanosine
Fig. 1Linear regression analysis with YKL-40 as dependent variable and TMAO—living donor transplantation cohort. Correlation coefficient for males (n = 39): r = 0.298, p = 0.077; for females (n = 20): r = − 0.169, p = 0.474
Fig. 2Linear regression analysis with GDF-15 as dependent variable and TMAO. Incident dialysis cohort. Correlation coefficient for males (n = 53): r = 0.069, p = 0.622; for females (n = 29): r = 0.471, p = 0.011
GDF-15 linear regression analysis in males
| Estimate | Standard error | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vascular calcification | |||
| Model 1 | |||
| lnCAC score | 0.285 | 0.131 | |
| Model 2 | |||
| lnCAC score | 0.286 | 0.125 | |
| Inflammatory biomarkers | |||
| Model 1 | |||
| IL-6 | 0.199 | 0.076 | |
| hsCRP | − 0.020 | 0.061 | 0.747 |
| TNF-alfa | − 0.029 | 0.044 | 0.504 |
| Model 2 | |||
| IL-6 | 0.167 | 0.080 | |
| hsCRP | − 0.028 | 0.061 | 0.654 |
| TNF-alfa | − 0.019 | 0.044 | 0.675 |
Bold signifies statistical significance p < 0.05
Model 1: adjusted for age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, kidney function
Model 2: Model 1 + adjusted for mortality
lnCAC logarithmic coronary artery calcification, expressed as ln(CAC + 1), hsCRP high sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin 6, TNF tumour necrosis factor
Fig. 3Average GDF-15 concentration in regards of CVD severity in males and females. CVD severity assessed by CT scan and extent of coronary artery calcification set to a nominal scale ranging from none (Agatston score = 0; females n = 17; males n = 23), mild to moderate (Agatston score = 1–400; females n = 13; males n = 23), and severe calcification (Agatston score > 400; females n = 12; males n = 29). Data presented as median (IQR). Kruskal–Wallis; **p < 0.01
Sex divided linear regression models with biomarkers adjusted to age
| Males | Females | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMP-9-dependent variable | YKL-40-dependent variable | |||||
| Estimate | SE | Estimate | SE | |||
| Albumin, g/L | − 17.346 | 6.520 | − 3.852 | 2.242 | 0.090 | |
| HbA1c, mmol/mmol | 6.503 | 2.841 | – | – | – | |
| Haemoglobin, g/L | – | – | – | − 2.794 | 0.822 | |
| 8OHdG | − 696.603 | 213.836 | – | – | – | |
Bold signifies statistical significance p < 0.05
eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, 8OHgG 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine
Fig. 4Sex-specific biomarker associations and all-cause mortality. A Sex divided GDF-15 level comparison in alive patients (females n = 71; males n = 127), and deceased patients (females n = 7; males n = 21). B Sex divided YKL-40 level comparison in alive patients (females n = 70; males n = 123), and deceased patients (females n = 7; males n = 21). Data presented median (IQR). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, age adjusted