Literature DB >> 33239189

Machine learning integration of circulating and imaging biomarkers for explainable patient-specific prediction of cardiac events: A prospective study.

Balaji K Tamarappoo1, Andrew Lin2, Frederic Commandeur1, Priscilla A McElhinney2, Sebastien Cadet1, Markus Goeller3, Aryabod Razipour2, Xi Chen1, Heidi Gransar1, Stephanie Cantu1, Robert Jh Miller1, Stephan Achenbach4, John Friedman1, Sean Hayes1, Louise Thomson1, Nathan D Wong5, Alan Rozanski6, Piotr J Slomka1, Daniel S Berman1, Damini Dey7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We sought to assess the performance of a comprehensive machine learning (ML) risk score integrating circulating biomarkers and computed tomography (CT) measures for the long-term prediction of hard cardiac events in asymptomatic subjects.
METHODS: We studied 1069 subjects (age 58.2 ± 8.2 years, 54.0% males) from the prospective EISNER trial who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring CT, serum biomarker assessment, and long-term follow-up. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) was quantified from CT using fully automated deep learning software. Forty-eight serum biomarkers, both established and novel, were assayed. An ML algorithm (XGBoost) was trained using clinical risk factors, CT measures (CAC score, number of coronary lesions, aortic valve calcium score, EAT volume and attenuation), and circulating biomarkers, and validated using repeated 10-fold cross validation.
RESULTS: At 14.5 ± 2.0 years, there were 50 hard cardiac events (myocardial infarction or cardiac death). The ML risk score (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC] 0.81) outperformed the CAC score (0.75) and ASCVD risk score (0.74; both p = 0.02) for the prediction of hard cardiac events. Serum biomarkers provided incremental prognostic value beyond clinical data and CT measures in the ML model (net reclassification index 0.53 [95% CI: 0.23-0.81], p < 0.0001). Among novel biomarkers, MMP-9, pentraxin 3, PIGR, and GDF-15 had highest variable importance for ML and reflect the pathways of inflammation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and fibrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, ML integration of novel circulating biomarkers and noninvasive imaging measures provided superior long-term risk prediction for cardiac events compared to current risk assessment tools.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Cardiac computed tomography; Cardiovascular risk stratification; Machine learning; Serum biomarkers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33239189      PMCID: PMC7856265          DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  32 in total

1.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  An assessment of incremental coronary risk prediction using C-reactive protein and other novel risk markers: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.

Authors:  Aaron R Folsom; Lloyd E Chambless; Christie M Ballantyne; Josef Coresh; Gerardo Heiss; Kenneth K Wu; Eric Boerwinkle; Thomas H Mosley; Paul Sorlie; Guoqing Diao; A Richey Sharrett
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-10

3.  Plasma concentrations and genetic variation of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and prognosis of patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Stefan Blankenberg; Hans J Rupprecht; Odette Poirier; Christoph Bickel; Marek Smieja; Gerd Hafner; Jürgen Meyer; François Cambien; Laurence Tiret
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Aortic valve calcium independently predicts coronary and cardiovascular events in a primary prevention population.

Authors:  David S Owens; Matthew J Budoff; Ronit Katz; Junichiro Takasu; David M Shavelle; J Jeffrey Carr; Susan R Heckbert; Catherine M Otto; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Richard A Kronmal; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-06

5.  Age-Biomarkers-Clinical Risk Factors for Prediction of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Yuen-Kwun Wong; Chloe Y Y Cheung; Clara S Tang; Ka-Wing Au; JoJo S H Hai; Chi-Ho Lee; Kui-Kai Lau; Bernard M Y Cheung; Pak-Chung Sham; Aimin Xu; Karen S L Lam; Hung-Fat Tse
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  Pentraxin-3 in chronic heart failure: the CORONA and GISSI-HF trials.

Authors:  Roberto Latini; Lars Gullestad; Serge Masson; Ståle Haugset Nymo; Thor Ueland; Ivan Cuccovillo; Mari Vårdal; Barbara Bottazzi; Alberto Mantovani; Donata Lucci; Nobuhito Masuda; Yukio Sudo; John Wikstrand; Gianni Tognoni; Pål Aukrust; Luigi Tavazzi
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 15.534

7.  Predicting the 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease: the framingham heart study.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Martin G Larson; Joseph M Massaro; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Multiple inflammatory biomarkers in relation to cardiovascular events and mortality in the community.

Authors:  Renate B Schnabel; Xiaoyan Yin; Martin G Larson; Jennifer F Yamamoto; João D Fontes; Sekar Kathiresan; Jian Rong; Daniel Levy; John F Keaney; Thomas J Wang; Joanne M Murabito; Ramachandran S Vasan; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 9.  Circulating biomarkers for predicting cardiovascular disease risk; a systematic review and comprehensive overview of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Thijs C van Holten; Leonie F Waanders; Philip G de Groot; Joost Vissers; Imo E Hoefer; Gerard Pasterkamp; Menno W J Prins; Mark Roest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephen Kaptoge; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Gordon Lowe; Mark B Pepys; Simon G Thompson; Rory Collins; John Danesh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Epicardial and pericardial fat analysis on CT images and artificial intelligence: a literature review.

Authors:  Federico Greco; Rodrigo Salgado; Wim Van Hecke; Romualdo Del Buono; Paul M Parizel; Carlo Augusto Mallio
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

Review 2.  Extra-coronary Calcification and Cardiovascular Events: What Do We Know and Where Are We Heading?

Authors:  Dixitha Anugula; Rhanderson Cardoso; Gowtham R Grandhi; Ron Blankstein; Khurram Nasir; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Dipan J Shah; Miguel Cainzos-Achirica
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 5.967

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular CT: Current status and future implications.

Authors:  Andrew Lin; Márton Kolossváry; Manish Motwani; Ivana Išgum; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 4.  Dysfunctional Vascular Endothelium as a Driver of Atherosclerosis: Emerging Insights Into Pathogenesis and Treatment.

Authors:  Steven R Botts; Jason E Fish; Kathryn L Howe
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Machine Learning-Based Hospital Discharge Prediction for Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: Development and Usability Study.

Authors:  Tae Joon Jun; Young-Hak Kim; Imjin Ahn; Hansle Gwon; Heejun Kang; Yunha Kim; Hyeram Seo; Heejung Choi; Ha Na Cho; Minkyoung Kim
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-11-17

6.  Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques in blood vessels with low oxygenated blood and blood pressure (Pulmonary trunk): role of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15).

Authors:  G A Bonaterra; N Struck; S Zuegel; A Schwarz; L Mey; H Schwarzbach; J Strelau; R Kinscherf
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 7.  Current and Future Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Nitesh Gautam; Prachi Saluja; Abdallah Malkawi; Mark G Rabbat; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Gianluca Pontone; Yiye Zhang; Benjamin C Lee; Subhi J Al'Aref
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence-A Good Assistant to Multi-Modality Imaging in Managing Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Ming-Hao Liu; Chen Zhao; Shengfang Wang; Haibo Jia; Bo Yu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 9.  Ischemic Heart Disease and Liver Cirrhosis: Adding Insult to Injury.

Authors:  Irina Gîrleanu; Anca Trifan; Laura Huiban; Cristina Muzîca; Oana Cristina Petrea; Ana Maria Sîngeap; Camelia Cojocariu; Stefan Chiriac; Tudor Cuciureanu; Irina Iuliana Costache; Carol Stanciu
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-12

10.  Role of GDF-15, YKL-40 and MMP 9 in patients with end-stage kidney disease: focus on sex-specific associations with vascular outcomes and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Agne Laucyte-Cibulskiene; Liam J Ward; Valeria Raparelli; Karolina Kublickiene; Thomas Ebert; Giulia Tosti; Claudia Tucci; Leah Hernandez; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Maria-Trinidad Herrero; Colleen M Norris; Louise Pilote; Magnus Söderberg; Torkel B Brismar; Jonaz Ripsweden; Peter Stenvinkel
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 5.027

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.