Literature DB >> 28389123

Circulating GDF-15 levels predict future secondary manifestations of cardiovascular disease explicitly in women but not men with atherosclerosis.

Aisha Gohar1, Isabel Gonçalves2, Joyce Vrijenhoek3, Saskia Haitjema3, Ian van Koeverden3, Jan Nilsson4, Gert J de Borst5, Jean-Paul de Vries6, Gerard Pasterkamp7, Hester M den Ruijter3, Harry Björkbacka4, Saskia C A de Jager8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elevated serum levels of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), is an established risk factor for a range of cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of plasma GDF-15 as a biomarker for secondary cardiovascular events (CVE) in patients with atherosclerosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Secondly, we determined whether plasma GDF-15 was associated with carotid plaque characteristics.
METHODS: Circulating GDF-15 levels were determined by Luminex assay in a cohort of 1056 patients from the Athero-Express biobank. Composite endpoint was defined as major CVE, death and peripheral vascular interventions. Findings were validated in 473 patients from the independent Carotid Plaque Imaging Project biobank.
RESULTS: GDF-15 levels did not associate with secondary CVE in the total cohort. However, following a significant interaction with sex, it was found to be strongly, independently predictive of secondary CVE in women but not men (quartile 4 vs. quartile 1: HR 3.04 [95% CI 1.35-6.86], p=0.007 in women vs. HR 0.96 [95% CI 0.66-1.40], p=0.845 in men). This was also observed in the validation cohort (women: HR 2.28 [95% CI 1.04-5.05], p=0.041), albeit dependent upon renal function. In addition, GDF-15 was associated with the presence of plaque smooth muscle cells and calcification.
CONCLUSION: High circulating GDF-15 levels are predictive of secondary CVE in women but not in men with carotid atherosclerotic disease undergoing CEA, suggesting a potential use for GDF-15 as a biomarker for secondary prevention in women. Sex differences in the role of GDF-15 in atherosclerotic disease deserve further interest.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerosis; Biomarker; GDF-15; Prognosis; Secondary outcome; Women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28389123     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  11 in total

Review 1.  Growth differentiation factor 15 in adverse cardiac remodelling: from biomarker to causal player.

Authors:  Marian Wesseling; Julius H C de Poel; Saskia C A de Jager
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-05-18

Review 2.  Roles of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 in Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Liqun Wei; Xinchun Yang; Jiuchang Zhong
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  GDF-15 (Growth Differentiation Factor 15) Is Associated With Hospitalization and Mortality in Patients With a Fontan Circulation.

Authors:  Sophie L Meyer; Djoeke Wolff; Floris-Jan S Ridderbos; Graziella Eshuis; Hans Hillege; Tineke P Willems; Tjark Ebels; Joost P van Melle; Rolf M F Berger
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 are associated with a decreased pulse-wave velocity in young, healthy adults.

Authors:  Paul Pettersson-Pablo; Torbjörn K Nilsson; Lars H Breimer; Anita Hurtig-Wennlöf
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Pathophysiology of Circulating Biomarkers and Relationship With Vascular Aging: A Review of the Literature From VascAgeNet Group on Circulating Biomarkers, European Cooperation in Science and Technology Action 18216.

Authors:  Kristina R Gopcevic; Eugenia Gkaliagkousi; János Nemcsik; Ömür Acet; M Rosa Bernal-Lopez; Rosa M Bruno; Rachel E Climie; Nikolaos Fountoulakis; Emil Fraenkel; Antonios Lazaridis; Petras Navickas; Keith D Rochfort; Agnė Šatrauskienė; Jūratė Zupkauskienė; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 6.  Sex-related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review.

Authors:  Navin Suthahar; Laura M G Meems; Jennifer E Ho; Rudolf A de Boer
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 15.534

7.  CRP Stimulates GDF15 Expression in Endothelial Cells through p53.

Authors:  Yoonseo Kim; Nicole Noren Hooten; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 4.711

8.  Circulating Neutrophils Do Not Predict Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease in Women with Former Preeclampsia.

Authors:  John A L Meeuwsen; Judith de Vries; Gerbrand A Zoet; Arie Franx; Bart C J M Fauser; Angela H E M Maas; Birgitta K Velthuis; Yolande E Appelman; Frank L Visseren; Gerard Pasterkamp; Imo E Hoefer; Bas B van Rijn; Hester M den Ruijter; Saskia C A de Jager
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Role of GDF-15, YKL-40 and MMP 9 in patients with end-stage kidney disease: focus on sex-specific associations with vascular outcomes and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Agne Laucyte-Cibulskiene; Liam J Ward; Valeria Raparelli; Karolina Kublickiene; Thomas Ebert; Giulia Tosti; Claudia Tucci; Leah Hernandez; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Maria-Trinidad Herrero; Colleen M Norris; Louise Pilote; Magnus Söderberg; Torkel B Brismar; Jonaz Ripsweden; Peter Stenvinkel
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 5.027

10.  Circulating growth differentiation factor-15 as a novel biomarker in heart transplant.

Authors:  Nithi Tokavanich; Supanee Sinphurmsukskul; Narisorn Kongruttanachok; Kanokwan Thammanatsakul; Supaporn Sritangsirikul; Aekarach Ariyachaipanich; Pat Ongcharit; Sarawut Siwamogsatham; Smonporn Boonyaratavej; Sarinya Puwanant
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.