| Literature DB >> 32225016 |
Elena Rodríguez-Sánchez1, José Alberto Navarro-García1, Jennifer Aceves-Ripoll1, Judith Abarca-Zabalía1, Andrea Susmozas-Sánchez1, Teresa Bada-Bosch2, Eduardo Hernández2, Evangelina Mérida-Herrero2, Amado Andrés2, Manuel Praga2, Mario Fernández-Ruiz3, José María Aguado3, Julián Segura1, Luis Miguel Ruilope1,4,5, Gema Ruiz-Hurtado1,5.
Abstract
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is complicated by a chronic state of inflammation and a high mortality risk. However, different RRT modalities can have a selective impact on markers of inflammation and oxidative stress. We evaluated the levels of active matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 in patients undergoing two types of dialysis (high-flux dialysis (HFD) and on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF)) and in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients. Active MMP-9 was measured by zymography and ELISA before (pre-) and after (post-) one dialysis session, and at baseline and follow-up (7 and 14 days, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months) after KT. Active MMP-9 decreased post-dialysis only in HFD patients, while the levels in OL-HDF patients were already lower before dialysis. Active MMP-9 increased at 7 and 14 days post-KT and was restored to baseline levels three months post-KT, coinciding with an improvement in renal function and plasma creatinine. Active MMP-9 correlated with pulse pressure as an indicator of arterial stiffness both in dialysis patients and KT recipients. In conclusion, active MMP-9 is better controlled in OL-HDF than in HFD and is restored to baseline levels along with stabilization of renal parameters after KT. Active MMP-9 might act as a biomarker of arterial stiffness in RRT.Entities:
Keywords: dialysis; high-flux dialysis; kidney transplantation; matrix metalloproteinase-9; on-line hemodiafiltration; renal replacement therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32225016 PMCID: PMC7226477 DOI: 10.3390/biom10040505
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Baseline characteristics of dialysis patients.
| All Patients ( | HFD Patients ( | OL-HDF Patients ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 60.0 ± 16,4 | 64.7 ± 22.0 | 58.2 ± 13.8 | 0.322 |
| Male sex ( | 16 (50) | 1 (11) | 15 (65) | 0.016 |
| Hypertension ( | 25 (78) | 7 (78) | 18 (78) | 0.999 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 128.4 ± 23.0 | 126.2 ± 23.2 | 129.3 ± 23.4 | 0.739 |
| PP (mmHg) | 55.5 ± 17.5 | 58.4 ± 14.6 | 54.3 ± 18.7 | 0.556 |
| Diabetes mellitus ( | 7 (22) | 2 (22) | 5 (22) | 0.999 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 2565 ± 1735 | 2753 ± 1245 | 2509 ± 1881 | 0.769 |
|
| ||||
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 7.61 ± 2.22 | 7.16 ± 2.22 | 7.78 ± 2.25 | 0.486 |
| Serum albumin (g/dL) | 4.05 ± 0.43 | 3.91 ± 0.24 | 4.10 ± 0.48 | 0.259 |
| Potassium (mEq/L) | 5.15 ± 0.90 | 5.06 ± 0.78 | 5.19 ± 0.95 | 0.725 |
| Bicarbonate (mEq/L) | 21.3 ± 2.9 | 21.2 ± 3.8 | 21.3 ± 2.6 | 0.974 |
| Dialysis vintage (months) | 79.5 ± 74.3 | 31.4 ± 24.5 | 98.4 ± 79.1 | 0.020 |
| Kt/V | 1.63 ± 0.24 | 1.68 ± 0.25 | 1.61 ± 0.24 | 0.463 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 6.92 ± 3.00 | 6.48 ± 2.92 | 7.09 ± 3.08 | 0.614 |
| Residual diuresis ( | 15 (52) | 5 (56) | 10 (43) | 0.699 |
| Interdialytic urine volume (mL) | 375 (163–875) | 250 (100–500) | 500 (175–1000) | 0.518 |
|
| 0.547 | |||
| Glomerulonephritis ( | 7 (22) | 2 (22) | 5 (22) | |
| Diabetic nephropathy ( | 5 (16) | 1 (11) | 4 (17) | |
| Polycystic kidney disease ( | 4 (12) | 0 (0) | 4 (17) | |
| Hypertensive nephropathy ( | 2 (6) | 0 (0) | 2 (9) | |
| Other or undetermined ( | 14 (44) | 6 (67) | 8 (35) | |
|
| ||||
| ACEi/ARB ( | 8 (25) | 2 (22) | 6 (26) | 0.999 |
| Diuretics ( | 3 (9) | 0 (0) | 3 (13) | 0.541 |
| β-blockers ( | 13 (41) | 5 (56) | 8 (35) | 0.427 |
| Cinacalcet ( | 3 (9) | 0 (0) | 3 (13) | 0.541 |
| Paricalcitol ( | 12 (38) | 5 (56) | 7 (30) | 0.253 |
SBP: systolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure; NT-proBNP: N-terminal (NT)-pro B-type natriuretic peptide; Kt/V: where K is the dialyzer urea clearance, t is the total treatment time, and V is the total volume within the body that urea is distributed; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD: chronic kidney disease; ACEi: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker.
Baseline characteristics of kidney transplant recipients.
| All Patients | |
|---|---|
| Age of the recipient (years) | 54.6 ± 15.8 |
| Male sex ( | 27 (59) |
| Previous kidney transplant ( | 4 (9) |
| Pretransplant dialysis ( | 41 (89) |
| Dialysis vintage (months) | 21.0 ± 19.0 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 134.5 ± 14.8 |
| PP (mmHg) | 49.9 ± 12.9 |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 6.27 ± 2.56 |
| Serum albumin (g/dL) | 4.23 ± 0.52 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 9.82 ± 4.28 |
|
| |
| Male sex ( | 25 (54) |
| Age (years) | 52.6 ± 14.6 |
| Living donor ( | 5 (11) |
| Number of HLA-mismatches | 5 (4–5) |
|
| |
| IgA nephropathy | 9 (20) |
| Glomerulonephritis | 2 (4) |
| Diabetic nephropathy | 7 (15) |
| Polycystic kidney disease | 8 (17) |
| Hypertensive nephropathy | 3 (7) |
| Other or undetermined | 17 (37) |
|
| 38 (83) |
|
| |
| Steroids | 46 (100) |
| Tacrolimus | 46 (100) |
| Mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid | 42 (91) |
| Cyclosporine A | 0 (0) |
SBP: systolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD: chronic kidney disease; HLA: human leukocyte antigen.
Figure 1Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 activity in pre- and post-dialysis according to the type of dialysis applied. (A) Representative zymography gel showing plasma gelatinase MMP-9 activity (upper panel) and quantification (bottom panel). (B) Quantification of active MMP-9 by ELISA in plasma of dialysis patients before (pre-dialysis) and after (post-dialysis) one session of dialysis. (C) Representative zymography gel showing plasma gelatinase MMP-9 activity (upper panel) and quantification (bottom panel). (D) Quantification of active MMP-9 formed by ELISA in plasma of dialysis patients stratified as those on high-flux dialysis (HFD) (pre- and post-dialysis) and on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) (pre- and post-dialysis). (E) Negative correlation between interdialytic urine volume and pre-dialysis active MMP-9 in dialysis patients with residual urine volume. Correlation was performed using Spearman’s test and a linear regression of the data is displayed. * p < 0.05 vs. pre-dialysis; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 vs. HFD pre-dialysis.
Figure 2MMP-9 activity profile before and after kidney transplantation. (A) Representative zymography gel showing plasma gelatinase MMP-9 activity. (B) Quantification of active MMP-9 by zymography in plasma of kidney transplantation (KT) patients at baseline (before KT) and after 7 and 14 days, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. (C) Quantification of active MMP-9 by ELISA in plasma of KT patients at baseline and after 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months. (D) Evolution of eGFR, plasma creatinine, and active MMP-9 at baseline and 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months after KT. *** p < 0.001 vs. baseline and ### p < 0.001 vs. 7 days after KT.
Figure 3Total protein MMP-9 and tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP)-1 levels, MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio, and MMP-9:TIMP-1 interactions before and after KT. (A) Total MMP-9 protein levels (B) and total TIMP-1 protein levels quantified by ELISA at baseline and at 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months after KT. (C) MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio estimation. (D) AlphaLISA® MMP-9:TIMP-1 interaction immunoassay expressed as binding relative luminescence units (RLUs). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. baseline; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 vs. 7 days after KT; and φ p < 0.05, φφ p < 0.01, φφφ p < 0.001 vs. 3 months after KT.
Figure 4Correlation between MMP-9 activity and systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) at pre-dialysis and before KT. (A) No association of MMP-9 activity with SBP (in green) and a positive significant correlation with PP (in blue) in dialysis patients in pre-dialysis. (B) No association of MMP-9 activity with SBP (in green) and a positive significant correlation with PP (in blue) in KT recipients before KT (baseline). Correlation was performed using Spearman’s test and a linear regression of the data is displayed.